Greenhouse Gas Mitigation of Rural Household Biogas Systems in China: A Life Cycle Assessment

被引:25
|
作者
Hou, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Weifeng [1 ]
Wang, Pei [1 ]
Dou, Zhengxia [2 ]
Gao, Liwei [3 ]
Styles, David [4 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Ctr Resources Environm & Food Secur, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Vet Med, Ctr Anim Hlth & Prod, Kennett Sq, PA 19348 USA
[3] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Agr Informat Inst, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Bangor Univ, Sch Environm Nat Resources & Geog, Bangor LL57 2UW, Gwynedd, Wales
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biogas; manure storage; energy substitution; subsidy; small-scale; subsistence farming; DIGESTERS; PLANTS; MANURE;
D O I
10.3390/en10020239
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Rural household biogas (RHB) systems are at a crossroads in China, yet there has been a lack of holistic evaluation of their energy and climate (greenhouse gas mitigation) efficiency under typical operating conditions. We combined data from monitoring projects and questionnaire surveys across hundreds of households from two typical Chinese villages within a consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) framework to assess net GHG (greenhouse gas) mitigation by RHB systems operated in different contexts. We modelled biogas production, measured biogas losses and used survey data from biogas and non-biogas households to derive empirical RHB system substitution rates for energy and fertilizers. Our results indicate that poorly designed and operated RHB systems in northern regions of China may in fact increase farm household GHG emissions by an average of 2668 kgCO(2)-eqyear(-1), compared with a net mitigation effect of 6336 kgCO(2)-eq per household and year in southern regions. Manure treatment (104 and 8513 kgCO(2)-eq mitigation) and biogas leakage (-533 and -2489 kgCO(2)-eq emission) are the two most important factors affecting net GHG mitigation by RHB systems in northern and southern China, respectively. In contrast, construction (-173 and -305 kgCO(2)-eq emission), energy substitution (-522 emission and 653 kgCO(2)-eq mitigation) and nutrient substitution (-1544 and -37 kgCO(2)-eq emission) made small contributions across the studied systems. In fact, survey data indicated that biogas households had higher energy and fertilizer use, implying no net substitution effect. Low biogas yields in the cold northern climate and poor maintenance services were cited as major reasons for RHB abandonment by farmers. We conclude that the design and management of RHB systems needs to be revised and better adapted to local climate (e.g., digester insulation) and household energy demand (biogas storage and micro power generators to avoid discharge of unburned biogas). More precise nutrient management planning could ensure that digestate nutrients are more effectively utilized to substitute synthetic fertilizers.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Techno-economic and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of liquefied natural gas supply chain in China
    Zhang, Jinrui
    Meerman, Hans
    Benders, Rene
    Faaij, Andre
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 224
  • [42] Using life-cycle assessments for the environmental evaluation of greenhouse gas mitigation options
    Nieuwlaar, E
    Alsema, E
    vanEngelenburg, B
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 37 (6-8) : 831 - 836
  • [43] Goods Movement Life Cycle Assessment for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Goals
    Nahlik, Matthew J.
    Kaehr, Andrew T.
    Chester, Mikhail V.
    Horvath, Arpad
    Taptich, Michael N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 20 (02) : 317 - 328
  • [44] At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting
    Amma Asantewaa Agyei Boakye
    Terrie Boguski
    Sarah Cashman
    Christoph Koffler
    Ashley Kreuder
    Manish Kumar
    Naveen Kumar Vipparla
    Lisa Peterson
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 321 - 335
  • [45] At the intersection of life cycle assessment and indirect greenhouse gas emissions accounting
    Boakye, Amma Asantewaa Agyei
    Boguski, Terrie
    Cashman, Sarah
    Koffler, Christoph
    Kreuder, Ashley
    Kumar, Manish
    Vipparla, Naveen Kumar
    Peterson, Lisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (04): : 321 - 335
  • [46] Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: A life cycle assessment
    Sonne, Edie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (04) : 1439 - 1450
  • [47] Assessment of the driving factors of CO2 mitigation costs of household biogas systems in China: A LMDI decomposition with cost analysis model
    Zhang, Weishi
    Xu, Ying
    Wang, Can
    Streets, David G.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 181 : 978 - 989
  • [48] Life cycle assessment of household biogas production in Egypt: Influence of digester volume, biogas leakages, and digestate valorization as biofertilizer
    Ioannou-Ttofa, Lida
    Foteinis, Spyros
    Moustafa, Amira Seifelnasr
    Abdelsalam, Essam
    Samer, Mohamed
    Fatta-Kassinos, Despo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 286
  • [49] Impact of government subsidies on household biogas use in rural China
    Sun, Dingqiang
    Bai, Junfei
    Qiu, Huanguang
    Cai, Yaqing
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 73 : 748 - 756
  • [50] Sustainability effects of household-scale biogas in rural China
    Gosens, Jorrit
    Lu, Yonglong
    He, Guizhen
    Bluemling, Bettina
    Beckers, Theo A. M.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 54 : 273 - 287