Imaging and computational considerations for image computed permeability: Operating envelope of Digital Rock Physics

被引:65
|
作者
Saxena, Nishank [1 ]
Hows, Amie [1 ]
Hofmann, Ronny [1 ]
Alpak, Faruk O. [1 ]
Freeman, Justin [1 ]
Hunter, Sander [1 ]
Appel, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Shell Int Explorat & Prod, Houston, TX 77079 USA
关键词
Digital rock; Permeability; Petrology; Numerical solutions; REV; LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHOD; REPRESENTATIVE VOLUME ELEMENT; EFFECTIVE ELASTIC PROPERTIES; POROUS-MEDIA; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; PORE-MORPHOLOGY; THIN-SECTIONS; 3D PROPERTIES; 2D IMAGES; NM-SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.04.001
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
This study defines the optimal operating envelope of the Digital Rock technology from the perspective of imaging and numerical simulations of transport properties. Imaging larger volumes of rocks for Digital Rock Physics (DRP) analysis improves the chances of achieving a Representative Elementary Volume (REV) at which flow-based simulations (1) do not vary with change in rock volume, and (2) is insensitive to the choice of boundary conditions. However, this often comes at the expense of image resolution. This trade-off exists due to the finiteness of current state-of-the-art imaging detectors. Imaging and analyzing digital rocks that sample the REV and still sufficiently resolve pore throats is critical to ensure simulation quality and robustness of rock property trends for further analysis. We find that at least 10 voxels are needed to sufficiently resolve pore throats for single phase fluid flow simulations. If this condition is not met, additional analyses and corrections may allow for meaningful comparisons between simulation results and laboratory measurements of permeability, but some cases may fall outside the current technical feasibility of DRP. On the other hand, we find that the ratio of field of view and effective grain size provides a reliable measure of the REV for siliciclastic rocks. If this ratio is greater than 5, the coefficient of variation for single-phase permeability simulations drops below 15%. These imaging considerations are crucial when comparing digitally computed rock flow properties with those measured in the laboratory. We find that the current imaging methods are sufficient to achieve both REV (with respect to numerical boundary conditions) and required image resolution to perform digital core analysis for coarse to fine-grained sandstones.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 144
页数:18
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Digital rock physics and laboratory considerations on a high-porosity volcanic rock
    Schepp, Laura L.
    Ahrens, Benedikt
    Balcewicz, Martin
    Duda, Mandy
    Nehler, Mathias
    Osorno, Maria
    Uribe, David
    Steeb, Holger
    Nigon, Benoit
    Stoeckhert, Ferdinand
    Swanson, Donald A.
    Siegert, Mirko
    Gurris, Marcel
    Saenger, Erik H.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [2] Digital rock physics and laboratory considerations on a high-porosity volcanic rock
    Laura L. Schepp
    Benedikt Ahrens
    Martin Balcewicz
    Mandy Duda
    Mathias Nehler
    Maria Osorno
    David Uribe
    Holger Steeb
    Benoit Nigon
    Ferdinand Stöckhert
    Donald A. Swanson
    Mirko Siegert
    Marcel Gurris
    Erik H. Saenger
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [3] Analysis of heterogeneity and permeability anisotropy in carbonate rock samples using digital rock physics
    Sun, Huafeng
    Vega, Sandra
    Tao, Guo
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 156 : 419 - 429
  • [4] Computational considerations in digital image fusion via wavelets
    Carr, JR
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2005, 31 (04) : 527 - 530
  • [5] Digital rock physics benchmarks-Part I: Imaging and segmentation
    Andrae, Heiko
    Combaret, Nicolas
    Dvorkin, Jack
    Glatt, Erik
    Han, Junehee
    Kabel, Matthias
    Keehm, Youngseuk
    Krzikalla, Fabian
    Lee, Minhui
    Madonna, Claudio
    Marsh, Mike
    Mukerji, Tapan
    Saenger, Erik H.
    Sain, Ratnanabha
    Saxena, Nishank
    Ricker, Sarah
    Wiegmann, Andreas
    Zhan, Xin
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 50 : 25 - 32
  • [6] Visual attributes of a rock and their relationship to permeability: A comparison of digital image and minipermeameter data
    Tidwell, VC
    Wilson, JL
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (11)
  • [7] Digital versus plain film imaging in the operating room: cost and safety considerations
    Resnick, Daniel K.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (12): : 1035 - 1036
  • [8] Anisotropy of fracture and permeability in high-rank coal analyzed using digital rock physics
    Wang, Xianglong
    Pan, Jienan
    Hou, Quanlin
    Li, Guofu
    Liu, Liangliang
    Wang, Zhenzhi
    Zhang, Lei
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2023, 35 (09)
  • [9] AAPM/RNSA basic physics lecture for the radiologic technologist: Basic physics of digital imaging and computed radiography
    Weiser, JC
    Tucker, D
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 17 - 17
  • [10] Permeability Estimation of Porous Rock by Means of Fluid Flow Simulation and Digital Image Analysis
    Winardhi, C. W.
    Mautana, F. I.
    Latief, F. D. E.
    PADJADJARAN EARTH DIALOGUES: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GEOPHYSICAL ISSUES, PEDISGI, 2016, 29