If religion is or could be a source of instability or a conflict factor it is a matter which started to concern, relative recently, the academic world and not only. Although, from ancient times, the leaders used the religion to manipulate the people, to justify their actions-not always fair and well-intentioned and to justfy own power, its disregard or the superficial and flippant interpretation from the last years proved us how wrong could be this attitude. Unfortunately, the adherence, the taking up or no-matter-how-could-be-named the process of being aware of this adherence, by the individual, to the religion's ideology was and still is looked being a very bad or a very good thing. It is passing from bad to good, from an extreme to another-from Haven to Hell never through a middle line. Some experts are saying that is not middle way when we have to understand a religion, we can not speak about compromise, understanding, good-peace when it is studying the religion, in the mass. Is that's a likely story?!
