Immunogenicity and Efficacy of Insulin Glargine Biosimilar Ezelin versus Originator Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

被引:3
|
作者
Tarigan, Tri Juli Edi [1 ]
Dwijayanti, Adisti [2 ]
Setyowati, Susie [3 ]
Louisa, Melva [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo Natl Referral Hosp, Fac Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab,Dept Internal Med, Jakarta, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Dept Med Pharm, Jakarta, Indonesia
[3] Gatot Soebroto Presidential Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Dept Pharmacol & Therapeut, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
biosimilar; insulin autoantibody; zinc transporter 8 antibody; hyperglycemia; BLOOD-GLUCOSE; THERAPY; AUTOANTIBODIES; MANAGEMENT; PREFERENCE; INITIATION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2147/DMSO.S279385
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the immunogenicity and efficacy of insulin glargine biosimilar Ezelin (EZL) versus originator insulin glargine Lantus (LAN) as a reference basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Patients and Methods: This was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, 24-week study in insulin-naive patients with T2D, with HbA1c of >7.0%. We randomly assigned 133 eligible patients to receive either EZL or LAN. Baseline characteristics, including insulin autoantibody (IAA), zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8) antibody, HbA1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (2hPPG), AST, ALT, BUN, eGFR, and oral antidiabetic drugs, were obtained before starting insulin treatment. After starting treatment, insulin dose was titrated to achieve FPG target along with oral antidiabetic drugs. Patients were given home glucometer and assisted to record plasma glucose measurement and adverse event (AE). Every month, patients came to the diabetes clinic and performed a regular physical examination and intensifying treatment if needed. Out of the 133 randomized patients, only 122 completed the study and can be examined for their IAA and ZnT8 after 6 months of treatment. The study was registered in clinicaltrials. gov, NCT03352674. Results: There is a similar proportion of patients with changes of IAA from baseline: 1 out of 58 (1.7%) patients receiving EZL versus 1 out of 64 (1.6%) patients receiving LAN (p = 1.000). One patient in the EZL group (1.7%) versus none in the LAN group experienced a change of ZnT8 antibody from baseline. Similar glucose control in EZL versus LAN was determined by the change in HbA1c, FPG, and 2hPPG (-2.0%, -67.46 mg/dL, and -76.51 mg/dL in the EZL group versus -1.7%, -58.11 mg/dL, and -70.03 mg/dL in the LAN group). There were six events of documented hypoglycemia in the EZL group versus five events in the LAN group. No patients experienced diabetic ketoacidosis during the study. Conclusion: Overall, insulin glargine biosimilar EZL and originator insulin glargine LAN have shown a similar immunogenicity profile, as well as efficacy in providing glucose control and safety findings in T2D populations.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 116
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DIABETES DURATION AND THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF INSULIN GLARGINE VERSUS COMPARATOR TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Garg, Satish K.
    Aurand, Lisa A.
    Rimler, Michael S.
    Dailey, George E.
    ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (02) : 120 - 128
  • [22] Biosimilar Glargine Insulin: Implications for Prescribers and Patients
    Pereira, Katherine
    JNP-JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2017, 13 (03): : 236 - 237
  • [23] Six Months Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Wockhardt's Biosimilar Insulin Glargine (Glaritus®) with Reference Insulin Glargine (Lantus®) in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in India
    Sharma, Surendra
    Ajmani, Ajay Kumar
    Khosla, Pooja
    Mukhopadhayay, Pradip
    Bhatia, Girish
    Kg, Prakash
    Chhaya, Gaurav
    Supe, Pravin
    Pavithran, Vinodkumar
    Bora, Hrishikesh
    Shah, Agam
    Ingole, Shahu Ashok
    Jain, Rishi
    DIABETES, 2019, 68
  • [24] Insulin therapy in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: the role of insulin glargine
    Janka, H. U.
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2008, 10 : 35 - 41
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine and insulin lispro combined with insulin glargine in patients with Type 1 diabetes
    Prager, R
    Dreyer, M
    Robinson, A
    Busch, K
    Penfornis, A
    Souhami, E
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 : A301 - A301
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of coadministration of sitagliptin with insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes
    Cao, Ying
    Gao, Fang
    Zhang, Qian
    Xu, Lingling
    Wan, Qian
    Li, Wenqi
    Li, Jimin
    Wang, Ling
    Xue, Yaoming
    JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2017, 9 (05) : 502 - 509
  • [27] Similar efficacy and safety with LY2963016 insulin glargine compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the ELEMENT 2 study
    Hollander, P.
    Rosenstock, J.
    Bhargava, A.
    Ilag, L. L.
    Pollom, R. K.
    Huster, W. J.
    Prince, M. J.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : S388 - S388
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of MK-1293 insulin glargine compared with originator insulin glargine (Lantus) in type 1 diabetes: A randomized, open-label clinical trial
    Home, Philip D.
    Lam, Raymond L. H.
    Carofano, Wendy L.
    Golm, Gregory T.
    Eldor, Roy
    Crutchlow, Michael F.
    Marcos, Michael C.
    Rosenstock, Julio
    Hollander, Priscilla A.
    Gallwitz, Baptist
    DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2018, 20 (09): : 2220 - 2228
  • [29] Starting an insulin regimen with insulin lispro mix 25 versus glargine insulin for type 2 diabetes
    Fernandez Lando, Laura
    Massari, Fabio
    Oviedo, Alejandra
    Jiang, Honghua
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2012, 72 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [30] Reduced hypoglycemia risk with insulin glargine - A metaanalysis comparing insulin glargine with human NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes
    Rosenstock, J
    Dailey, G
    Massi-Benedetti, M
    Fritsche, A
    Lin, ZN
    Salzman, A
    DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (04) : 950 - 955