Estimating glomerular filtration rate: Performance of the CKD-EPI equation over time in patients with type 2 diabetes

被引:25
|
作者
Wood, Anna J. [1 ]
Churilov, Leonid [2 ,3 ]
Perera, Nayomi [1 ]
Thomas, David [4 ]
Poon, Aurora [4 ]
MacIsaac, Richard J. [5 ,6 ]
Jerums, George [1 ,5 ]
Ekinci, Elif I. [1 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth Endocrine Ctr, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[2] Florey Inst Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Austin Hlth Nucl Med Dept, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Austin Hlth, Dept Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, St Vincents Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Darwin, NT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Type; 2; diabetes; Renal function; Estimated GFR; CKD-EPI; Measured GFR; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; SERUM CREATININE; INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; BODY-MASS; RATE GFR; ALBUMINURIA; ACCURATE; FORMULAS; MDRD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.08.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess the performance of the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation at baseline and longitudinally in people with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Adults with type 2 diabetes attending Austin Health, Melbourne, with >= 3 prospective GFR measurements were included in this retrospective study. Plasma disappearance rate of DTPA (diethylene-triamine-penta-acetic acid) was used to calculate measured GFR (mGFR) and compared to estimated GFR (eGFR). The agreement between mGFR and eGFR was estimated using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results: 152 patients had a median of 4 (IQR: 3, 5) mGFR measurements over a period of 11 years (IQR: 9,12). The difference between mGFR and eGFR increased proportionally to the magnitude of the GFR, increasing by 02 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for every 1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) increase in mGFR, indicative of proportional bias. At lower mGFR levels, eGFR overestimated mGFR, and at higher mGFR levels, eGFR underestimated mGFR. There was a significant association between LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure and the difference between mGFR and eGFR Conclusions: The CKD-EPI formula underestimates mGFR and the rate of decline of mGFR in patients with type 2 diabetes with an mGFR greater than 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). The association between LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, diastolic blood pressure and the difference between mGFR and eGFR warrants further study. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CREATININE-BASED CKD-EPI EQUATION LEADS TO OVERESTIMATION OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
    Aleksandrov, V.
    Alekhina, I.
    Aleksandrov, A.
    Shilova, L.
    Aleksandrova, N.
    Zborovskaya, I.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 581 - 582
  • [32] MDRD VERSUS CKD-EPI EQUATIONS TO ESTIMATE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE IN OBESE PATIENTS
    Bouquegneau, A.
    Delanaye, P.
    Cavalier, E.
    Krzesinski, J-M
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2013, 68 (04): : 319 - 319
  • [33] Combined creatinine-cystatin C CKD-EPI equation significantly underestimates measured glomerular filtration rate in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Machado, Julia Dauernheimer
    Camargo, Eduardo Guimaraes
    Boff, Roberta
    Rodrigues, Lais da Silva
    Camargo, Joiza Lins
    Soares, Ariana Aguiar
    Silveiro, Sandra Pinho
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2018, 53 : 43 - 48
  • [34] MDRD VERSUS CKD-EPI EQUATIONS TO ESTIMATE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE IN OBESE PATIENTS
    Bouquegneau, Antoine
    Cavalier, Etienne
    Krzesinski, Jean-Marie
    Delanaye, Pierre
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 28 : 137 - 137
  • [35] Comparison of Risk Prediction Using the CKD-EPI Equation and the MDRD Study Equation for Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
    Matsushita, Kunihiro
    Mahmoodi, Bakhtawar K.
    Woodward, Mark
    Emberson, Jonathan R.
    Jafar, Tazeen H.
    Jee, Sun Ha
    Polkinghorne, Kevan R.
    Shankar, Anoop
    Smith, David H.
    Tonelli, Marcello
    Warnock, David G.
    Wen, Chi-Pang
    Coresh, Josef
    Gansevoort, Ron T.
    Hemmelgarn, Brenda R.
    Levey, Andrew S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (18): : 1941 - 1951
  • [36] Glomerular filtration rate estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in type 1 diabetes based on genomic ancestry
    Marcela Haas Pizarro
    Deborah Conte Santos
    Laura Gomes Nunes Melo
    Bianca Senger Vasconcelos Barros
    Luiza Harcar Muniz
    Luís Cristóvão Porto
    Dayse Aparecida Silva
    Rachel Bregman
    Marilia Brito Gomes
    Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, 12
  • [37] Glomerular filtration rate estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in type 1 diabetes based on genomic ancestry
    Pizarro, Marcela Haas
    Santos, Deborah Conte
    Nunes Melo, Laura Gomes
    Vasconcelos Barros, Bianca Senger
    Muniz, Luiza Harcar
    Porto, Luis Cristovao
    Silva, Dayse Aparecida
    Bregman, Rachel
    Gomes, Marilia Brito
    DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME, 2020, 12 (01):
  • [38] Difference between CKD-EPI and MDRD equations in calculating glomerular filtration rate in patients with cirrhosis
    Han-Hsiang Chen
    Tsang-En Wang
    Ching-Wei Chang
    Chih-Jen Wu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (40) : 4532 - 4538
  • [39] MDRD or CKD-EPI for glomerular filtration rate estimation in living kidney donors
    Burballa, Carla
    Crespo, Marta
    Redondo-Pachon, Dolores
    Perez-Saez, Maria Jose
    Mir, Marisa
    Arias-Cabrales, Carlos
    Frances, Albert
    Fumado, Lluis
    Cecchini, Lluis
    Pascual, Julio
    NEFROLOGIA, 2018, 38 (02): : 207 - 212
  • [40] Difference between CKD-EPI and MDRD equations in calculating glomerular filtration rate in patients with cirrhosis
    Chen, Yu-Wei
    Chen, Han-Hsiang
    Wang, Tsang-En
    Chang, Ching-Wei
    Chang, Chen-Wang
    Wu, Chih-Jen
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (40) : 4532 - 4538