Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection

被引:25
|
作者
Walker, Stephanie M. [1 ]
Mehralivand, Sherif [1 ]
Harmon, Stephanie A. [1 ,2 ]
Sanford, Thomas [1 ]
Merino, Maria J. [3 ]
Wood, Bradford J. [4 ,5 ]
Shih, Joanna H. [6 ]
Pinto, Peter A. [7 ]
Choyke, Peter L. [1 ]
Turkbey, Baris [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, 10 Ctr Dr,Rm B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Frederick Natl Lab Canc Res, Clin Res Directorate, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] NCI, Lab Pathol, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Ctr Intervent Oncol, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[5] NIH, Radiol & Imaging Sci, Clin Ctr, Bldg 10, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[6] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[7] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
early detection; multiparametric MRI; PI-RADS; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; BIOPSY; MRI; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.22679
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data and System version 2.1 (PI-RADSv2.1), which was released in March 2019 to update version 2.0, for prostate cancer detection with transrectal ultrasound-MRI fusion biopsy and 12-core systematic biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. This prospective study included 110 consecutively registered patients who underwent multiparametric MRI evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1 criteria followed by fusion biopsy and systematic biopsy between April and September 2019. Lesion-based cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 0) and clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason grade group, > 1). RESULTS. A total of 171 lesions (median size, 1.1 cm) in 110 patients were detected and evaluated with PI-RADSv2.1. In 16 patients no lesion was detected, and only systematic biopsy was performed. Lesions were categorized as follows: PI-RADS category 1, 1 lesion; PI-RADS category 2, 34 lesions; PI-RADS category 3, 54 lesions; PI-RADS category 4, 52 lesions; and PI-RADS category 5, 30 lesions. Histopathologic analysis revealed prostate cancer in 74 of 171 (43.3%) lesions and clinically significant prostate cancer in 57 of 171 (33.3%) lesions. The CDRs of prostate cancer for PI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 20.0%, 24.1%, 51.9%, and 90.0%. The CDRs of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 lesions were 0%, 5.7%, 14.8%, 44.2%, and 80.0%. In 16 patients with normal multiparametric MRI findings ( PI-RADS 1), the CDRs were 50.0% for PCa and 18.8% for clinically significant prostate cancer. CONCLUSION. This investigation yielded CDRs assessed with prospectively assigned PI-RADSv2.1 scores. CDRs increased with higher PI-RADSv2.1 scores. These results can be compared with previously published outcomes derived with PI-RADS version 2.0.
引用
收藏
页码:1098 / 1103
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI
    Song, Jihui
    Zhao, Chenglin
    Zhang, Fei
    Yuan, Yingdi
    Wang, Lee M.
    Sah, Vivek
    Zhang, Jun
    Weng, Wencai
    Yang, Zhenghan
    Wang, Zhenchang
    Wang, Liang
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (02) : 704 - 712
  • [32] The diagnostic performance in clinically significant prostate cancer with PI-RADS version 2.1: simplified bpMRI versus standard mpMRI
    Jihui Song
    Chenglin Zhao
    Fei Zhang
    Yingdi Yuan
    Lee M. Wang
    Vivek Sah
    Jun Zhang
    Wencai Weng
    Zhenghan Yang
    Zhenchang Wang
    Liang Wang
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 704 - 712
  • [33] Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Bednarova, Sandra
    Shih, Joanna. H.
    Mertan, Francesca V.
    Gaur, Sonia
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (03): : 583 - 589
  • [34] PI-RADS v2.1 Combined With Prostate-Specific Antigen Density for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Peripheral Zone
    Wen, Jing
    Tang, Tingting
    Ji, Yugang
    Zhang, Yilan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [35] PI-RADS 2.1 and structured reporting of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate
    Hoetker, Andreas
    Donati, Olivio F.
    RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (09): : 802 - 809
  • [36] Interreader agreement with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer in MRI/TRUS software fusion prostate biopsy
    Kim, J.
    Song, W. H.
    Lee, D. D.
    Lee, S. S.
    Nam, J. K.
    Ryu, H. S.
    Kim, T. U.
    Park, S. W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2022, 81 : S722 - S723
  • [37] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MRI diagnosis strategy for prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using PI-RADS version 2.1
    Zhang, Jiahui
    Xu, Lili
    Zhang, Gumuyang
    Zhang, Xiaoxiao
    Bai, Xin
    Ji, Zhigang
    Xiao, Yu
    Sun, Hao
    Jin, Zhengyu
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (08) : 2905 - 2916
  • [38] Comparison between biparametric and multiparametric MRI diagnosis strategy for prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using PI-RADS version 2.1
    Jiahui Zhang
    Lili Xu
    Gumuyang Zhang
    Xiaoxiao Zhang
    Xin Bai
    Zhigang Ji
    Yu Xiao
    Hao Sun
    Zhengyu Jin
    Abdominal Radiology, 2022, 47 : 2905 - 2916
  • [39] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    Aileen O’Shea
    Mukesh Harisinghani
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 523 - 532
  • [40] PI-RADS: multiparametric MRI in prostate cancer
    O'Shea, Aileen
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (04) : 523 - 532