Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review

被引:192
|
作者
Charles, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Giraudeau, Bruno [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Dechartres, Agnes
Baron, Gabriel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ravaud, Philippe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, AP HP, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Rech Clin, F-75877 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 07, UFR Med, Paris, France
[3] INSERM, U738, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Invest Clin 202, INSERM, Tours, France
[5] Univ Tours, Tours, France
[6] CHRU Tours, Tours, France
来源
关键词
MEDICAL-RESEARCH; STATISTICS; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.b1732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess quality of reporting of sample size calculation, ascertain accuracy of calculations, and determine the relevance of assumptions made when calculating sample size in randomised controlled trials. Design Review. Data sources We searched MEDLINE for all primary reports of two arm parallel group randomised controlled trials of superiority with a single primary outcome published in six high impact factor general medical journals between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006. All extra material related to design of trials (other articles, online material, online trial registration) was systematically assessed. Data extracted by use of a standardised form included parameters required for sample size calculation and corresponding data reported in results sections of articles. We checked completeness of reporting of the sample size calculation, systematically replicated the sample size calculation to assess its accuracy, then quantified discrepancies between a priori hypothesised parameters necessary for calculation and a posteriori estimates. Results Of the 215 selected articles, 10 (5%) did not report any sample size calculation and 92 (43%) did not report all the required parameters. The difference between the sample size reported in the article and the replicated sample size calculation was greater than 10% in 47 (30%) of the 157 reports that gave enough data to recalculate the sample size. The difference between the assumptions for the control group and the observed data was greater than 30% in 31% (n=45) of articles and greater than 50% in 17% (n=24). Only 73 trials (34%) reported all data required to calculate the sample size, had an accurate calculation, and used accurate assumptions for the control group. Conclusions Sample size calculation is still inadequately reported, often erroneous, and based on assumptions that are frequently inaccurate. Such a situation raises questions about how sample size is calculated in randomised controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials
    Hooper, Richard
    Teerenstra, Steven
    de Hoop, Esther
    Eldridge, Sandra
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (26) : 4718 - 4728
  • [32] DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
    Jonathan A. Cook
    Steven A. Julious
    William Sones
    Lisa V. Hampson
    Catherine Hewitt
    Jesse A. Berlin
    Deborah Ashby
    Richard Emsley
    Dean A. Fergusson
    Stephen J. Walters
    Edward C. F. Wilson
    Graeme Maclennan
    Nigel Stallard
    Joanne C. Rothwell
    Martin Bland
    Louise Brown
    Craig R. Ramsay
    Andrew Cook
    David Armstrong
    Doug Altman
    Luke D. Vale
    [J]. Trials, 19
  • [33] DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    Julious, Steven A.
    Sones, William
    Hampson, Lisa V.
    Hewitt, Catherine
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Ashby, Deborah
    Emsley, Richard
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Walters, Stephen J.
    Wilson, Edward C. F.
    Maclennan, Graeme
    Stallard, Nigel
    Rothwell, Joanne C.
    Bland, Martin
    Brown, Louise
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Cook, Andrew
    Armstrong, David
    Altman, Doug
    Vale, Luke D.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2018, 19
  • [34] DELTA2 guidance on choosing the target difference and undertaking and reporting the sample size calculation for a randomised controlled trial
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    Julious, Steven A.
    Sones, William
    Hampson, Lisa, V
    Hewitt, Catherine
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Ashby, Deborah
    Emsley, Richard
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Walters, Stephen J.
    Wilson, Edward C. F.
    MacLennan, Graeme
    Stallard, Nigel
    Rothwell, Joanne C.
    Bland, Martin
    Brown, Louise
    Ramsay, Craig R.
    Cook, Andrew
    Armstrong, David
    Altman, Doug
    Vale, Luke D.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 363
  • [35] A systematic review of reporting quality for anaesthetic interventions in randomised controlled trials
    Elliott, L.
    Coulman, K.
    Blencowe, N. S.
    Qureshi, M., I
    Lee, K. S.
    Hinchliffe, R. J.
    Mouton, R.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 (06) : 832 - 836
  • [36] The quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in asthma: systematic review protocol
    Ntala, Chara
    Birmpili, Panagiota
    Worth, Allison
    Anderson, Niall H.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (01): : PS1 - PS8
  • [37] The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: an updated review
    Lucy Turner
    David Moher
    Larissa Shamseer
    Laura Weeks
    Jodi Peters
    Amy Plint
    Douglas G Altman
    Kenneth F Schulz
    [J]. Trials, 12 (Suppl 1)
  • [38] Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
    Abraha, Iosief
    Montedori, Alessandro
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 33
  • [39] Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: A systematic review of reporting quality
    Agha R.A.
    Camm C.F.
    Doganay E.
    Edison E.
    Siddiqui M.R.S.
    Orgill D.P.
    [J]. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2014, 37 (2) : 55 - 62
  • [40] Pitfalls in Reporting Sample Size Calculation Across Randomized Controlled Trials Involving Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19
    Kow, Chia Siang
    Hasan, Syed S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 28 (05) : E616 - E619