Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review

被引:192
|
作者
Charles, Pierre [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Giraudeau, Bruno [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Dechartres, Agnes
Baron, Gabriel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ravaud, Philippe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Bichat Claude Bernard, AP HP, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Rech Clin, F-75877 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 07, UFR Med, Paris, France
[3] INSERM, U738, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Invest Clin 202, INSERM, Tours, France
[5] Univ Tours, Tours, France
[6] CHRU Tours, Tours, France
来源
关键词
MEDICAL-RESEARCH; STATISTICS; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.b1732
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess quality of reporting of sample size calculation, ascertain accuracy of calculations, and determine the relevance of assumptions made when calculating sample size in randomised controlled trials. Design Review. Data sources We searched MEDLINE for all primary reports of two arm parallel group randomised controlled trials of superiority with a single primary outcome published in six high impact factor general medical journals between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2006. All extra material related to design of trials (other articles, online material, online trial registration) was systematically assessed. Data extracted by use of a standardised form included parameters required for sample size calculation and corresponding data reported in results sections of articles. We checked completeness of reporting of the sample size calculation, systematically replicated the sample size calculation to assess its accuracy, then quantified discrepancies between a priori hypothesised parameters necessary for calculation and a posteriori estimates. Results Of the 215 selected articles, 10 (5%) did not report any sample size calculation and 92 (43%) did not report all the required parameters. The difference between the sample size reported in the article and the replicated sample size calculation was greater than 10% in 47 (30%) of the 157 reports that gave enough data to recalculate the sample size. The difference between the assumptions for the control group and the observed data was greater than 30% in 31% (n=45) of articles and greater than 50% in 17% (n=24). Only 73 trials (34%) reported all data required to calculate the sample size, had an accurate calculation, and used accurate assumptions for the control group. Conclusions Sample size calculation is still inadequately reported, often erroneous, and based on assumptions that are frequently inaccurate. Such a situation raises questions about how sample size is calculated in randomised controlled trials.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reviewing research reporting in randomised controlled trials - the sample size calculation
    Ganesh, Venkata
    Sahni, Neeru
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 68 (07) : 662 - 663
  • [2] Adequate reporting of the sample size calculation in surgical randomized controlled trials
    Speich, Benjamin
    [J]. SURGERY, 2020, 167 (05) : 812 - 814
  • [3] Inadequate reporting of sample size calculations in cluster randomised trials: a review
    Clare Rutterford
    Monica Taljaard
    Stephanie Dixon
    Andrew Copas
    Sandra Eldridge
    [J]. Trials, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [4] CURRENT PRACTICE IN METHODOLOGY AND REPORTING OF THE SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION IN RANDOMISED TRIALS OF HIP AND KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Copsey, B.
    Thompson, J. Y.
    Vadher, K.
    Ali, U.
    Dutton, S. J.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    Lamb, S. E.
    Cook, J. A.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2018, 26 : S273 - S274
  • [5] Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review
    Copsey, Bethan
    Dutton, Susan
    Fitzpatrick, Ray
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    Cook, Jonathan A.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [6] Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review
    Bethan Copsey
    Susan Dutton
    Ray Fitzpatrick
    Sarah E. Lamb
    Jonathan A. Cook
    [J]. Trials, 18
  • [7] Underpowering in randomized trials reporting a sample size calculation
    Vickers, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (08) : 717 - 720
  • [8] Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review
    Abdulatif, M.
    Mukhtar, A.
    Obayah, G.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 115 (05) : 699 - 707
  • [9] Sample Size Calculation in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Reporting, Characteristics, and Results in Randomized Controlled Trials
    Latif, Lydia Abdul
    Daud Amadera, Joao Eduardo
    Pimentel, Daniel
    Pimentel, Thais
    Fregni, Felipe
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (02): : 306 - 315
  • [10] Cluster randomised controlled trials: sample size calculations
    Sedgwick, Philip
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346