How preschoolers perceive danger - A study of inattentional bias

被引:1
|
作者
Na, Feng [1 ]
Hui, Zhang [1 ]
Nan, Wang [1 ]
Congcong, Yan [1 ]
Qianru, Ji [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Normal Univ, Hangzhou Coll Preschool Teacher Educ, 1108 Gengwen Rd, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
浙江省自然科学基金;
关键词
Threat-relevant images; attentional bias; preschool children; inattentional blindness; snake; FEAR-RELEVANT STIMULI; VISUAL DETECTION; EVOLVED MODULE; THREAT; BLINDNESS; ATTENTION; FAMILIARITY; EXPERIENCE; PREFERENCE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/13506285.2022.2086332
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Harmful threats can sometimes appear unexpectedly in the lives of young children, whose limited experience leads to a greater risk of endangerment. The current study adapted the Variant Odd Ball protocol to explore the effects of threat and familiarity on inattentional blindness (IB). This research evaluated reactions to presentations of evolutionarily relevant images such as millipedes, snakes, escargots, and snails, compared with reactions to evolutionarily irrelevant images such as syringes, knives, flashlights, and spoons. Respondents included three hundred and forty 4-5-year-old preschool children. The findings were as follows: (1) The property of familiarity plays an important role in preschool children's IB to both evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images, and highly familiar images were easier to detect than less familiar images; (2) the manipulation of images showed that the threat-relevant stimuli were not more likely to be detected than the non-threat-relevant stimuli; (3) no significant difference was found between the detection rates of evolutionarily relevant and irrelevant images. Preschool children have a lower detection rate of threat-relevant images (e.g., snake, knife) which may reflect their limited experience of danger and weaker integration of these threat-relevant images in the current study.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 317
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How infant perceive faces
    de Schonen, Scania
    EVOLUTION PSYCHIATRIQUE, 2009, 74 (01): : 27 - 54
  • [32] HOW HOSPITALS PERCEIVE STANDARDS
    DIMONDA, R
    MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION, 1979, 13 (04): : 200 - 203
  • [33] HOW PRINCIPALS PERCEIVE THEIR SUPERINTENDENTS
    NIMNICHT, GP
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1959, 41 (02) : 65 - 66
  • [34] HOW WE PERCEIVE FLAVOR
    OMAHONY, MAP
    NUTRITION TODAY, 1984, 19 (03) : 6 - 15
  • [35] HOW DENTISTS PERCEIVE THEIR PATIENTS
    SCHAUB, RMH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 (04) : 460 - 460
  • [36] HOW TEACHERS PERCEIVE MEDIA
    DODGE, M
    BOGDAN, R
    BROGDEN, N
    LEWIS, R
    EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 1974, 7 (04) : 21 - 24
  • [37] How Couples Perceive Their Marriage?
    Kizildag, Seval
    Sahin, Irem
    CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF EDUCATION JOURNAL, 2018, 47 (02): : 667 - 693
  • [38] How plants perceive salt
    Steinhorst, Leonie
    Kudla, Joerg
    NATURE, 2019, 572 (7769) : 318 - 320
  • [39] HOW AMERICANS PERCEIVE ANIMALS
    TANGLEY, L
    BIOSCIENCE, 1984, 34 (01) : 12 - 12
  • [40] HOW PALEONTOLOGISTS PERCEIVE CHEMISTS
    HALLAM, A
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1988, 196 : 42 - NUCL