Mammography decision making: Trends and predictors of provider communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey, 2011 to 2014

被引:11
|
作者
Spring, Laura M. [2 ]
Marshall, Megan R. [3 ]
Warner, Erica T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Clin Translat Epidemiol Unit, 55 Fruit St,Bartlett 9, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Breast Med Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
communication; decision making; mammography; surveys and questionnaires; BREAST-CANCER STAGE; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; BENEFITS; SURVIVAL; HARMS; TESTS; RISK; RACE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30378
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDIn 2009, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommended that the decision to initiate screening mammography before age 50 years should be individualized. Herein, the authors examined whether health care providers are communicating regarding mammography decision making with women and whether communication is associated with screening behavior. METHODSData were drawn from the 2011 to 2014 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). A total of 5915 female respondents aged40 years who responded to the following question were included: Has a doctor or other health professional ever told you that you could choose whether or not to have a mammogram? We used logistic regression to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for predictors of provider communication and assessed whether provider communication was associated with mammography in the previous 2 years overall and stratified by age. RESULTSFewer than 50% of the women reported provider communication regarding mammogram choice. Women who reported provider communication were not found to be more likely to report no mammogram within the past 2 years (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.87-1.31) compared with those who did not. When stratified by 10-year age group, provider communication was associated with a higher likelihood of no mammogram only among women age 70 years (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.15-2.34), and was associated with a lower likelihood of no mammogram only among women aged 40 to 49 years (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43-0.92). CONCLUSIONSBetween 2011 and 2014, less than one-half of women received communication regarding mammogram choice despite recommendations from the US Preventive Services Task Force. Provider communication regarding mammogram choice can influence screening behavior, particularly for younger and older women. Cancer 2017;123:401-409. (c) 2016 American Cancer Society. From 2011 to 2014, fewer than one-half of women received provider communication regarding mammogram choice in the study population, despite the recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Provider communication concerning mammogram choice can influence screening behavior, particularly for women aged 40 to 49 years and those aged 70 years.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 409
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mammography decision-making: Trends, predictors and effects of provider communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey 2011-2015
    Spring, Laura
    Marshall, Megan R.
    Warner, Erica T.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [2] Picking Up the Pace: Changes in Method and Frame for the Health Information National Trends Survey (2011-2014)
    Rutten, Lila J. Finney
    Davis, Terisa
    Beckjord, Ellen Burke
    Blake, Kelly
    Moser, Richard P.
    Hesse, Bradford W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 (08) : 979 - 989
  • [3] Use of Social Media in Health Communication: Findings From the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013, 2014, and 2017
    Huo, Jinhai
    Desai, Raj
    Hong, Young-Rock
    Turner, Kea
    Mainous, Arch G., III
    Bian, Jiang
    [J]. CANCER CONTROL, 2019, 26 (01)
  • [4] The Third Health Information National Trends Survey
    Ratzan, Scott C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2010, 15 : 1 - 2
  • [5] SHARED DECISION MAKING (SDM) PREVALENCE FOR MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING AMONG WOMEN AGED 40 TO 49 YEARS: THE 2011-12 HEALTH INFORMATION NATIONAL TRENDS SURVEY(HINTS4)
    Tanaka, Miho
    Kobrin, Sarah
    Portnoy, David
    Moser, Richard
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2013, 45 : S264 - S264
  • [6] Socioeconomic Status, Statistical Confidence, and Patient-Provider Communication: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2007)
    Smith, Samuel G.
    Wolf, Michael S.
    von Wagner, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2010, 15 : 169 - 185
  • [7] Patient-provider communication quality for persons with disabilities: A cross-sectional analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Marlow, Nicole M.
    Samuels, Shenae K.
    Jo, Ara
    Mainous, Arch G., III
    [J]. DISABILITY AND HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 12 (04) : 732 - 737
  • [8] Predictors of Palliative Care Knowledge: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Ogunsanya, Motolani E.
    Goetzinger, Elizabeth A.
    Owopetu, Oluwatomi F.
    Chandler, Paulette D.
    O'Connor, Lauren E.
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2021, 30 (07) : 1433 - 1439
  • [9] Predictors of palliative care knowledge: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Ogunsanya, Motolani E.
    O'Connor, Lauren
    Iken, Oluwatomi
    Chandler, Paulette D.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [10] Health Information Brokers in the General Population: An Analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey 2013-2014
    Cutrona, Sarah L.
    Mazor, Kathleen M.
    Agunwamba, Amenah A.
    Valluri, Sruthi
    Wilson, Patrick M.
    Sadasivam, Rajani S.
    Rutten, Lila J. Finney
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (06)