Predictors of Palliative Care Knowledge: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey

被引:10
|
作者
Ogunsanya, Motolani E. [1 ]
Goetzinger, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Owopetu, Oluwatomi F. [2 ]
Chandler, Paulette D. [3 ,4 ]
O'Connor, Lauren E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Pharm Clin & Adm Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK 73117 USA
[2] Univ Coll Hosp, Dept Community Med, Ibadan, Nigeria
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Prevent Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] NCI, Risk Factor Assessment Branch, Epidemiol & Genom Res Program, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci,NIH, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
END-OF-LIFE; AMERICAN SOCIETY; INTEGRATION; OUTCOMES; PATIENT; GROWTH; CANCER;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1790
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Palliative care plays an important role in improving the quality of life for patients with cancer and their caregivers and has been associated with increased patient satisfaction. However, palliative care knowledge in the general population is limited, and often physician referral occurs late in prognosis. The objective of this analysis was to examine factors associated with palliative care knowledge. Method: Using data from the 2018 NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5 Cycle 2, descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess factors associated with respondents' palliative care knowledge using ORs and 95% confidence intervals as measures of association. The outcome of interest was measured with the item "How would you describe your level of knowledge about palliative care?" Possible response selections were "I've never heard of it," "I know a little bit about palliative care," and "I know what palliative care is and could explain it to someone else." To reduce the risk of type 1 error, jackknife variance estimations with repeated replications were used. All analyses were conducted with the SURVEYLOGISTIC command using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.), and the statistical significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 3,450 respondents (weighted sample size: 249,489,772) met the inclusion criteria. About 89% (n = 3,000) of all respondents had inadequate knowledge of palliative care. Multi-variable analyses indicated that frequent health care utilization as defined as >= 2 times per year [OR, 3.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.65-3.58], female gender (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.31-3.59), being married (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.14-3.59), having a college degree or higher (OR, 13.83; 95% CI, 1.71-12.04), and having a regular source of care (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.37-1.90) had greater odds of adequate palliative care knowledge. Those without a cancer diagnosis were less likely to have adequate knowledge of palliative care (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.89). Conclusions: Knowledge of palliative care in the United States is low, particularly for those not already actively using their available healthcare system. Public health education efforts are needed to target subgroups of the U.S. population identified by this analysis to increase palliative care knowledge. Impact: Healthcare providers have a major role to play in improving palliative care knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:1433 / 1439
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of palliative care knowledge: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Ogunsanya, Motolani E.
    O'Connor, Lauren
    Iken, Oluwatomi
    Chandler, Paulette D.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [2] Geographic Variation in Knowledge of Palliative Care Among US Adults: Findings From 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey
    Chen, Guanming
    Hong, Young-Rock
    Wilkie, Diana J.
    Kittleson, Sheri
    Huo, Jinhai
    Bian, Jiang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 38 (03): : 291 - 299
  • [3] KNOWLEDGE OF PALLIATIVE CARE AMONG AMERICAN ADULTS: 2018 HEALTH INFORMATION NATIONAL TRENDS SURVEY
    Huo, J.
    Hong, Y. R.
    Grewal, R.
    Yadav, S.
    Heller, I. W.
    Bian, J.
    Wilkie, D. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S109 - S109
  • [4] Knowledge of Palliative Care Among American Adults: 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey
    Huo, Jinhai
    Hong, Young-Rock
    Grewal, Reetu
    Yadav, Sandhya
    Heller, Isaac W.
    Bian, Jiang
    Wilkie, Diana J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 58 (01) : 39 - +
  • [5] Perceived knowledge of palliative care among immigrants to the United States: a secondary data analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Barwise, Amelia
    Cheville, Andrea
    Wieland, Mark L.
    Gajic, Ognjen
    Greenberg-Worisek, Alexandra J.
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (04) : 451 - +
  • [6] AWARENESS OF PALLIATIVE CARE IN THE NATIONALLY-REPRESENTATIVE 2018 HEALTH INFORMATION NATIONAL TRENDS SURVEY
    Trivedi, Neha
    Peterson, Emily B.
    Ellis, Erin M.
    Ferrer, Rebecca
    Kent, Erin E.
    Chou, Wen-ying Sylvia
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S257 - S257
  • [7] Correlates of Consumer Trust in Online Health Information: Findings From the Health Information National Trends Survey
    Ye, Yinjiao
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2011, 16 (01) : 34 - 49
  • [8] CORRELATES OF KNOWLEDGE OF CLINICAL TRIALS AMONG UROLOGIC CANCER SURVIVORS: FINDINGS FROM THE HEALTH INFORMATION NATIONAL TRENDS SURVEY
    Jia, Hanna
    Roberson, Daniel
    Xia, Leilei
    Ding, James
    Guzzo, Thomas
    Lee, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E585 - E585
  • [9] Correlates of knowledge of clinical trials among US adults: Findings from the 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey
    Langford, Aisha T.
    Orellana, Kerli T.
    Buderer, Nancy
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 114
  • [10] Trust and sources of health information - The impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: Findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey
    Hesse, BW
    Nelson, DE
    Kreps, GL
    Croyle, RT
    Arora, NK
    Rimer, BK
    Viswanath, K
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (22) : 2618 - 2624