The effect of experience on the sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test: a diagnostic accuracy study

被引:19
|
作者
McShefferty, David [1 ]
Whitmer, William M. [1 ]
Swan, Iain R. C. [1 ]
Akeroyd, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC Inst Hearing Res, Scottish Sect, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2013年 / 3卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Sensitivity; Specificity; Hearing Tests; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; SCREENING-TEST; CLINICAL ROLE; OLDER-PEOPLE; CHILDREN; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002394
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test (WVT) in detecting hearing loss when administered by practitioners with different levels of experience. Design Diagnostic accuracy study of WVT, through acoustic analysis of whispers of experienced and inexperienced practitioners (experiment 1) and behavioural validation of these recordings (experiment 2). Setting Research institute with a pool of patients sourced from local clinics in the Greater Glasgow area. Participants 22 people had their whispers recorded and analysed in experiment 1; 4 older experienced (OE), 4 older inexperienced (OI) and 14 younger inexperienced (YI). In experiment 2, 73 people (112 individual ears) took part in a digit recognition task using 2 OE and 2 YI whisperers from experiment 1. Main outcome measures Average level (dB sound pressure level) across frequency, average level across all utterances (dB A) and within/across-digit deviation (dB A) for experiment 1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of WVT for experiment 2. Results In experiment 1, OE whisperers were 8-10dB more intense than inexperienced whisperers across all whispered utterances. Variability was low and comparable regardless of age or experience. In experiment 2, at an optimum threshold of 40dB HL, sensitivity and specificity were 63% (95% CI of 58% to 68%) and 93% (92% to 94%), respectively, for OE whisperers. PPV was 56% (51% to 61%), NPV was 95% (94% to 96%). For YI whisperers at an optimum threshold of 29dB HL, sensitivity and specificity were 80% (78% to 82%) and 52% (50% to 55%), respectively. PPV was 65% (63% to 67%) and NPV was 70% (67% to 72%). Conclusions WVT is an effective screening test, providing the level of the whisperer is considered when setting the test's hearing-loss criterion. Possible implications are voice measurement while training for inexperienced whisperers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening of hearing in elderly people: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility of the whispered voice test
    Labanca, Ludimila
    Guimaraes, Fernando Sales
    Costa-Guarisco, Leticia Pimenta
    Brandao Couto, Erica de Araujo
    Goncalves, Denise Utsch
    [J]. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2017, 22 (11): : 3589 - 3598
  • [2] The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Lin, Lifeng
    Chu, Haitao
    Hasan, Bashar
    Alsibai, Reem A.
    Abbas, Alzhraa S.
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Wang, Zhen
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2023, 195 (27) : E925 - E931
  • [3] EVALUATION OF THE SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF THE SJO® DIAGNOSTIC TEST
    Shen, L.
    Suresh, L.
    Sun, Y.
    Shi, G.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2016, 75 : 557 - 557
  • [4] SPECIFICITY, SENSITIVITY, AND DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF TPHA TEST
    LESINSKI, J
    KRACH, J
    KADZIEWICZ, E
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF VENEREAL DISEASES, 1974, 50 (05): : 334 - 340
  • [5] Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in diagnosing supraspinatus lesions: a prospective accuracy diagnostic study
    Yazigi Junior, Joao Alberto
    Nicolao, Fabio Anauate
    Matsunaga, Fabio Teruo
    Netto, Nicola Archetti
    Matsumoto, Marcelo Hide
    Sugawara Tamaoki, Marcel Jun
    [J]. SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 136 (04): : 292 - 297
  • [6] Sensitivity, Specificity and Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography in Breast Carcinoma
    Hanif, Nadia
    Babar, Aysha
    Amin, Ijaz
    Goraya, Amber
    Mohsin, Bushra
    Habib, Uzma
    Laique, Talha
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (01): : 67 - 69
  • [7] Validity, diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Whispered Paronym Words Test for the Rapid Detection of Presbycusis
    Valero-Garcia, Jesus
    Maria Vila-Rovira, Josep
    [J]. REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION EN LOGOPEDIA, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [8] Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV and NPV
    Wong, Hwee Bee
    Lim, Gek Hsiang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE, 2011, 20 (04) : 316 - 318
  • [9] The channel capacity of a diagnostic test as a function of test sensitivity and test specificity
    Benish, William A.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (06) : 1044 - 1052
  • [10] Accuracy Is ImportantRe: Sensitivity and Specificity of the Phallometric Test for Hebephilia
    Moser, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2015, 12 (12): : 2501 - 2501