The association of sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence: analysis of 6909 studies of diagnostic test accuracy

被引:13
|
作者
Murad, M. Hassan [1 ]
Lin, Lifeng [2 ]
Chu, Haitao [3 ]
Hasan, Bashar [1 ]
Alsibai, Reem A. [1 ]
Abbas, Alzhraa S. [1 ]
Mustafa, Reem A. [4 ]
Wang, Zhen [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Tucson, AZ USA
[3] Pfizer, Stat Res & Data Sci Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Kansas Hlth Syst, Dept Internal Med, Kansas City, KS USA
关键词
METAANALYSIS; SPECTRUM; BIAS;
D O I
10.1503/cmaj.221802
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Sensitivity and specificity are characteristics of a diagnostic test and are not expected to change as the prevalence of the target condition changes. We sought to evaluate the association between prevalence and changes in sensitivity and specificity. Methods:We retrieved data from meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2003-2020). We used mixed-effects random-intercept linear regression models to evaluate the association between prevalence and logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity. The model evaluated all meta-analyses as nested within each systematic review. Results:We analyzed 6909 diagnostic test accuracy studies from 552 meta-analyses that were included in 92 systematic reviews. For sensitivity, compared with the lowest quartile of prevalence, the second, third and fourth quartiles were associated with significantly higher odds of identifying a true positive case (odds ratio [OR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.26; OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.41; OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37-1.58; respectively). For specificity, compared with the lowest quartile of prevalence, the second, third and fourth quartiles were associated with significantly lower odds of identifying a true negative case (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.69-0.80; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.60-0.70; OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.44-0.51; respectively). Pooled regression coefficients from bivariate models conducted within each meta-analysis showed that prevalence was positively associated with sensitivity and negatively associated with specificity. Findings were consistent across subgroups. Interpretation:In this large sample of diagnostic studies, higher prevalence was associated with higher estimated sensitivity and lower estimated specificity. Clinicians should consider the implications of disease prevalence and spectrum when interpreting the results from studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:E925 / E931
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prospective studies of diagnostic test accuracy when disease prevalence is low
    Obuchowski, NA
    Zhou, XH
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2002, 3 (04) : 477 - 492
  • [2] On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies
    Li, JL
    Fine, J
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (16) : 2537 - 2550
  • [3] Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence
    Leeflang, Mariska M. G.
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2013, 185 (11) : E537 - E544
  • [4] The accuracy of patients' judgments of disease probability and test sensitivity and specificity
    Hamm, RM
    Smith, SL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 47 (01): : 44 - 52
  • [5] Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies
    Moons, KGM
    Harrell, FE
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 670 - 672
  • [6] THE DIAGNOSTIC SPECIFICITY AND SENSITIVITY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF PREVALENCE
    LUTZ, H
    WINKLER, GC
    [J]. SCHWEIZER ARCHIV FUR TIERHEILKUNDE, 1995, 137 (06): : 237 - 242
  • [7] The effect of experience on the sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test: a diagnostic accuracy study
    McShefferty, David
    Whitmer, William M.
    Swan, Iain R. C.
    Akeroyd, Michael A.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (04):
  • [8] Exact inference for disease prevalence based on a test with unknown specificity and sensitivity
    Cai, Bryan
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    Bendavid, Eran
    Tian, Lu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2023, 50 (11-12) : 2599 - 2623
  • [9] Sensitivity and Specificity of Diagnostic Accuracy in Alzheimer's Disease: A Synthesis of Existing Evidence
    Gaugler, Joseph E.
    Kane, Robert L.
    Johnston, Joseph A.
    Sarsour, Khaled
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER DEMENTIAS, 2013, 28 (04): : 337 - 347