Whither Now, Opinion Modelers?

被引:14
|
作者
Sobkowicz, Pawel [1 ]
机构
[1] NOMATEN Ctr Excellence, Natl Ctr Nucl Res, Otwock, Poland
关键词
agent-based models; opinion dynamics; post-truth; polarization; anti-vaccination; biases; emotions; BOUNDED CONFIDENCE; CONSENSUS ACHIEVEMENT; STATISTICAL PHYSICS; BIASED ASSIMILATION; STRENGTH DETECTION; DYNAMICS; LEADERS; TRUST; POLARIZATION; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.3389/fphy.2020.587009
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The article describes the current status and potential directions of development of agent-based models of social opinion dynamics. Despite extensive effort, the models achieve, at best, only qualitative agreement with social observations. To understand the increasingly pressing issues such as all-encompassing political and social polarization, resurgence of fundamentalist and populist movements, persistence of socially dangerous trends such as denial of climate change, or the anti-vaccination activism, the models must be capable of handling much more complex set of agent characteristics, content of the communications (between agents and through media) as well as psychologically adequate reaction mechanisms, and realistic influence networks. Moreover, to meet the challenge of understanding the globally growing political polarization and changes brought by increasing reliance on electronic communication, the models should adapt to the post-truth era. It is necessary to include in the models phenomena such as fake news, omnipresent exaggerations and stereotypes, trolling, and algorithmic biases funneling personal information universe. We also need to consider that most social systems may be described as transient, out-of-equilibrium ones, where a crucial role is played by the models' initial conditions. In this work, we analyze the challenges facing the modeling community and point out certain promising directions for development.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] WHITHER BIOETHICS NOW? THE PROMISE OF RELATIONAL THEORY
    Sherwin, Susan
    Stockdale, Katie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FEMINIST APPROACHES TO BIOETHICS, 2017, 10 (01): : 7 - 29
  • [32] Wither or whither now training in occupational medicine?
    Leckie, Alastair
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2015, 65 (06): : 426 - 428
  • [33] Signal transduction therapy for cancer - Whither now?
    Klein, Shoshana
    Levitzki, Alexander
    [J]. CURRENT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION THERAPY, 2006, 1 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [34] BIOCHEMISTRY AND HUMAN WELFARE - WHERE NOW AND WHITHER
    LEHNINGER, AL
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1971, 30 (04) : 1397 - +
  • [35] Artificial Colloids: Whither Go We Now?
    Hall, Richard
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (11) : 2651 - 2653
  • [36] SAFETY-BASED EPISTEMOLOGY: WHITHER NOW?
    Pritchard, Duncan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 34 : 33 - 45
  • [37] WHITHER UNITED-STATES SCIENCE NOW
    NORMAN, C
    [J]. NATURE, 1976, 264 (5582) : 101 - 103
  • [38] ECONOMIC CRISIS IN PRIVATE EDUCATION - WHITHER NOW
    BROWN, FJ
    [J]. REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 1973, 31 (01) : 93 - 97
  • [39] NOW WHITHER HISTORY - GERMAN - OELMULLER,W
    BORMANN, A
    [J]. ARGUMENT, 1978, 20 (JAN-): : 136 - 138
  • [40] Robotic donor right hepatectomy - whither now?
    Binoj, S. T.
    Mallick, S.
    Nair, K.
    Titus, V. Christi
    Balakrishnan, D.
    Gopalakrishnan, U.
    Guhan, V.
    Sudheer, O. V.
    Sudhindran, S.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 107 (09) : 63 - 63