Quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D shock control bumps for drag reduction on transonic wings

被引:9
|
作者
Deng, Feng [1 ]
Qin, Ning [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Key Lab Adv Design Technol Flight Vehicle, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Mech Engn, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Drag reduction; flow control; natural laminar flow; shock control bump; transonic; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; 3-DIMENSIONAL BUMPS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/0954410018778815
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, the design spaces of the 2D and 3D shock control bumps on an infinite unswept natural laminar flow wing are investigated by adopting an optimization enhanced parametric study method. The design space spanned by the design variables are explored through a series of design optimization and their landscapes around the optima are revealed. The effects of the bump spacing, bump length, and Mach number are investigated respectively around the optima. The maximum cross-sectional area, bump incident angle, and aspect ratio are found to be important design parameters. The associated flow physics is discussed in relation to these parameters. The comparative performance of the 2D and 3D bumps are explained in the context of the transonic area rule. Two types of flow separation are identified by varying the bump aspect ratio at off-design conditions. It is concluded that the 2D and 3D shock control bumps can have nearly the same performances at optimal designs with similar cross-sectional areas. Some practical design principles and guidelines are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:2344 / 2359
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantitative imaging in 2D and 3D with Lu-177
    Bailey, Dale
    Willowson, Kathy
    Bronzel, Marcus
    Schembri, Geoffrey
    Roach, Paul
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [32] A Step Forward in Quantitative Automated Mineralogy in 2D and 3D
    Taylor, Richard J. M.
    Hill, Eddy
    Andrew, Matthew
    GEOSTANDARDS AND GEOANALYTICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 48 (03) : 579 - 593
  • [33] Modal Analysis of Transonic Shock Buffet on 2D Airfoil
    Poplingher, Lior
    Raveh, Daniella E.
    Dowell, Earl H.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2019, 57 (07) : 2851 - 2866
  • [34] Intraoperative comparison of 2D versus 3D transesophageal echocardiography for quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation
    Lovhale, Pravin S.
    Gadhinglajkar, Shrinivas
    Sreedhar, Rupa
    Sukesan, Subin
    Pillai, Vivek
    ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 24 (02) : 163 - 171
  • [35] Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of 2D and 3D Projection Techniques for High-Dimensional Data
    Tian, Zonglin
    Zhai, Xiaorui
    van Steenpaal, Gijs
    Yu, Lingyun
    Dimara, Evanthia
    Espadoto, Mateus
    Telea, Alexandru
    INFORMATION, 2021, 12 (06)
  • [36] Quantitative Proteomic and Phosphoproteomic Comparison of 2D and 3D Colon Cancer Cell Culture Models
    Yue, Xiaoshan
    Lukowski, Jessica K.
    Weaver, Eric M.
    Skube, Susan B.
    Hummon, Amanda B.
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2016, 15 (12) : 4265 - 4276
  • [38] Quantitative comparison of proteomic data quality between a 2D and 3D quadrupole ion trap
    Blackler, AR
    Klammer, AA
    MacCoss, MJ
    Wu, CC
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 78 (04) : 1337 - 1344
  • [39] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [40] Strategies for a reduction to 2D graphical styles in 3D environment
    Department of Information Communication, Yuan Ze University Taoyuan, Taiwan, No. 135, Far-East Rd., Chung-Li, Taoyuan, 320, Taiwan
    Proc. IASTED Int. Conf. Comput. Graph. Imaging, CGIM, (1-8):