Quantitative comparison of 2D and 3D shock control bumps for drag reduction on transonic wings

被引:9
|
作者
Deng, Feng [1 ]
Qin, Ning [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Key Lab Adv Design Technol Flight Vehicle, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Mech Engn, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Drag reduction; flow control; natural laminar flow; shock control bump; transonic; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; 3-DIMENSIONAL BUMPS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/0954410018778815
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, the design spaces of the 2D and 3D shock control bumps on an infinite unswept natural laminar flow wing are investigated by adopting an optimization enhanced parametric study method. The design space spanned by the design variables are explored through a series of design optimization and their landscapes around the optima are revealed. The effects of the bump spacing, bump length, and Mach number are investigated respectively around the optima. The maximum cross-sectional area, bump incident angle, and aspect ratio are found to be important design parameters. The associated flow physics is discussed in relation to these parameters. The comparative performance of the 2D and 3D bumps are explained in the context of the transonic area rule. Two types of flow separation are identified by varying the bump aspect ratio at off-design conditions. It is concluded that the 2D and 3D shock control bumps can have nearly the same performances at optimal designs with similar cross-sectional areas. Some practical design principles and guidelines are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:2344 / 2359
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of 3D Shock Control Bumps on Transonic Buffet
    Bogdanski, S.
    Gansel, P.
    Lutz, T.
    Kraemer, E.
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING'14: TRANSACTIONS OF THE HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING CENTER, STUTTGART (HLRS) 2014, 2015, : 447 - 461
  • [2] Vortex-Generating Shock Control Bumps for Robust Drag Reduction at Transonic Speeds
    Deng, Feng
    Qin, Ning
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2021, 59 (10) : 3900 - 3909
  • [3] Quantitative comparison of 3D and 2D PET with brain studies
    Sossi, V
    Oakes, TR
    Chan, G
    Ruth, TJ
    1997 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM - CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1 & 2, 1998, : 1438 - 1441
  • [4] Ultrasound propagation in 2D and 3D concrete models -: A quantitative comparison
    Schubert, F
    Köhler, B
    ANNUAL MEETING 1998 - NONDESTRUCTIVE MATERIALS TESTING: NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF WELD JOINTS 70 YEARS LATER, 1997, 63 (1-2): : 549 - 560
  • [5] Numerical solution of subsonic and transonic flows in 2D and 3D
    Huml, Jaroslav
    Kozel, Karel
    EFM13 - EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS 2013, 2014, 67
  • [6] Quantitative brain PET: Comparison of 2D and 3D acquisitions.
    Dhawan, V
    Kazumata, K
    Robeson, W
    Belakhlef, A
    Margouleff, C
    Chaly, T
    Antonini, A
    Eidelberg, D
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) : 835 - 835
  • [7] Off-design performance of 2D adaptive shock control bumps
    Gramola, Michela
    Bruce, Paul J. K.
    Santer, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2020, 93
  • [8] Wing-wake interaction: comparison of 2D and 3D flapping wings in hover flight
    Lee, Y. J.
    Lua, K. B.
    BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS, 2018, 13 (06)
  • [9] MUTUAL DRAG OF 2D AND 3D ELECTRON GASES IN HETEROSTRUCTURES
    SOLOMON, PM
    LAIKHTMAN, B
    SUPERLATTICES AND MICROSTRUCTURES, 1991, 10 (01) : 89 - 94
  • [10] Passive control of 3D adaptive shock control bumps using a sealed cavity
    Gramola, Michela
    Bruce, Paul J. K.
    Santer, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2022, 112