Using τc to estimate magnitude for earthquake early warning and effects of near-field terms

被引:29
|
作者
Yamada, Masumi [1 ]
Mori, Jim [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Pioneering Res Unit Next Generat, Uji, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
关键词
RUPTURE; TAIWAN; RECORDS; SIGNALS; SYSTEM; WAVES; FAULT;
D O I
10.1029/2008JB006080
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes strong motion records of 24 large earthquakes to investigate the relationship between tau(c) (the period parameter of the first motion) and moment magnitude. The records of some of the large-magnitude events very close to the source include large near-field terms. Therefore, if we include the data with large near-field terms, we may overestimate the final size of the magnitude. We identified records with large near-field terms and did not include these data in processing the records to compute tau(c) for each event. Our analysis shows that the value of tau(c) is between the earthquake corner period and the period determined by the record duration tau(0). If the magnitude is less than 6, tau(c) closely approximates the corner period, whereas tau(c) for larger earthquakes depends on the rupture process and location of asperity. tau(c) for large earthquakes provides a lower bound on the event magnitude and approaches the corner period if a longer record is used. We also propose a method to classify the records with and without large near-field terms. If the peak displacement amplitude for the first 3 s (Pd3) exceeds 1 cm and tau(c) exceeds 2 s, the record is more likely to include large near-field terms. For the purpose of quick onsite warnings, stations observing large near-field terms provide valuable information. Large near-field terms can be observed only if the magnitude is large and the epicentral distance is small. Therefore, if the displacement exceeds a threshold (e.g., Pd = 0.5 cm), the ground motion at the site would likely become very large. This criterion will help to issue warnings to the blind zone, which is the region where there is insufficient time to issue a warning before the strong shaking arrives.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coherence effects in the near-field
    Roychowdhury, H
    Wolf, E
    JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2004, 51 (11) : 1603 - 1612
  • [42] NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF NEAR-FIELD, EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTION
    CHERRY, JT
    HALDA, EJ
    TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1973, 54 (04): : 372 - 372
  • [43] Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions
    Ambraseys, NN
    Douglas, J
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2003, 23 (01) : 1 - 18
  • [44] EARTHQUAKE CORE INFERRED FROM NEAR-FIELD OBSERVATIONS
    UMEDA, Y
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 1985, 118 (3-4) : 301 - 310
  • [45] Near-Field Microwave Imaging Using Focused Near-Field Beams: An Approach to Mitigate Undesired Scattering Effects
    Bayat, Nozhan
    Mojabi, Puyan
    2018 2ND URSI ATLANTIC RADIO SCIENCE MEETING (AT-RASC), 2018,
  • [46] An Improved Magnitude Estimation Method using Combination of Predominant Period and Peak Amplitude for Earthquake Early Warning
    Song Jindong
    Li Shanyou
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING II, PTS 1-4, 2013, 256-259 : 2775 - 2780
  • [47] Magnitude estimation using the first three seconds P-wave amplitude in earthquake early warning
    Wu, Yih-Min
    Zhao, Li
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (16)
  • [48] An Emergency Earthquake Warning System for Land Mobile Vehicles Using the Earthquake Early Warning
    Nagaosa, Tomotaka.
    Moriya, Seitaro
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VEHICULAR ELECTRONICS AND SAFETY, 2008, : 240 - 242
  • [49] New magnitude scaling relations for earthquake early warning in the Alborz region, Iran
    Sasani, Mohammad
    Ghayamghamian, Mohammad Reza
    Ansari, Anooshiravan
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2018, 66 (06) : 1375 - 1382
  • [50] Site class based seismic magnitude prediction equations for earthquake early warning
    Mugesh, A.
    Desai, Aniket
    Jakka, Ravi S.
    Kamal
    JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2024, 28 (03) : 765 - 786