Technique and Outcomes of Robot-assisted Retroperitoneoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Multicenter Study

被引:62
|
作者
Hu, Jim C. [1 ]
Treat, Eric [1 ]
Filson, Christopher P. [1 ]
McLaren, Ian [2 ]
Xiong, Siwei [1 ]
Stepanian, Sevan [3 ]
Hafez, Khaled S. [2 ]
Weizer, Alon Z. [2 ]
Porter, James [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Swedish Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
Renal cell carcinoma; Partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgery; Retroperitoneal approach; Outcomes; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; SMALL RENAL MASSES; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGEON VOLUME; OBESE-PATIENTS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COHORT; TUMORS; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RARPN) may be used for posterior renal masses or with prior abdominal surgery; however, there is relatively less familiarity with RARPN. Objective: To demonstrate RARPN technique and outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective multicenter study of 227 consecutive RARPNs was performed at the Swedish Medical Center, the University of Michigan, and the University of California, Los Angeles, from 2006 to 2013. Surgical procedure: RARPN. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We assessed positive margins and cancer recurrence. Stepwise regression was used to examine factors associated with complications, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), operative time (OT), and length of stay (LOS). Results and limitations: The median age was 60 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 52-66), and the median body mass index (BMI) was 28.2 kg/m(2) (IQR: 25.6-32.6). Median maximum tumor diameter was 2.3 cm (IQR: 1.7-3.1). Median OT and WIT were 165 min(IQR: 134-200) and 19 min (IQR: 16-24), respectively; median EBL was 75 ml (IQR: 50-150), and median LOS was 2 d (IQR: 1-3). Twenty-eight subjects (12.3%) experienced complications, three (1.3%) had urine leaks, and three (1.3%) had pseudoaneurysms that required reintervention. There was one conversion to radical nephrectomy and three transfusions. Overall, 143 clear cell carcinomas (62.6%) composed most of the histology with eight positive margins (3.5%) and two recurrences (0.9%) with a median follow-up of 2.7 yr. In adjusted analyses, intersurgeon variation was associated with complications (odds ratio [OR]: 3.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-10.27; p = 0.014) and WIT (parameter estimate [PE; plus or minus standard error]: 4.84 +/- 2.14; p = 0.025). Higher surgeon volume was associated with shorter WIT (PE: -0.06 +/- 0.02; p = 0.002). Higher BMI was associated with longer OT (PE: 2.09 +/- 0.56; p < 0.001). Longer OT was associated with longer LOS (PE: 0.01 +/- 0.01; p = 0.002). Finally, there was a trend for intersurgeon variation in OT (PE: 18.5 +/- 10.3; p = 0.075). Conclusions: RARPN has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, despite intersurgeon variation in WIT and complications. Greater experience is associated with shorter WIT. Patient summary: Robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy has acceptable morbidity and oncologic outcomes, and there is intersurgeon variation in warm ischemia time and complications. (C) 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 549
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for imperative vs elective indications
    Tan, Jo-Lynn S.
    Sathianathen, Niranjan
    Cumberbatch, Marcus
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Abaza, Ronney
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Yuvaraja, Thyavihally B.
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Ahlawat, Rajesh
    Rawal, Sudhir
    Buffi, Nicolo M.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Maes, Kris K.
    Gautham, Gagan
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Turkeri, Levent
    Bhandari, Mahendra
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Porter, James Roscoe
    Rogers, Craig R.
    Moon, Daniel A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 : 30 - 35
  • [42] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES AFTER SELECTIVE CLAMPING IN ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Kusaka, Mamoru
    Nukaya, Takuhisa
    Takenaka, Masashi
    Zennami, Kenji
    Ichino, Manabu
    Sasaki, Hitomi
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 209 : E1117 - E1118
  • [43] Functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Mikesell, Carter D.
    Younis, Salim K.
    Rai, Samarpit
    Wang, Lin
    Ionson, Annaliese C.
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Weight, Christopher J.
    Kaouk, Jihad
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2025,
  • [44] Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Functional and oncological outcomes
    Roos, F. C.
    Thomas, C.
    Neisius, A.
    Nestler, S.
    Thueroff, J. W.
    Hampel, C.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (02): : 213 - 218
  • [45] Perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in elderly patients
    Gopal Sharma
    Milap Shah
    Puneet Ahluwalia
    Prokar Dasgupta
    Benjamin J. Challacombe
    Mahendra Bhandari
    Rajesh Ahlawat
    Sudhir Rawal
    Nicolo M. Buffi
    Ananthakrishanan Sivaraman
    James R. Porter
    Craig Rogers
    Alexandre Mottrie
    Ronney Abaza
    Khoon Ho Rha
    Daniel Moon
    Thyavihally B. Yuvaraja
    Dipen J. Parekh
    Umberto Capitanio
    Kris K. Maes
    Francesco Porpiglia
    Levent Turkeri
    Gagan Gautam
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2789 - 2798
  • [46] Repeat robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN): feasibility and early outcomes
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Khalifeh, Ali
    Laydner, Humberto
    Samarasekera, Dinesh
    Rizkala, Emad
    Eyraud, Remi
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Stein, Robert J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (05) : 767 - 772
  • [47] Functional Outcomes after Selective Clamping in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
    Takahara, Kiyoshi
    Kusaka, Mamoru
    Nukaya, Takuhisa
    Takenaka, Masashi
    Zennami, Kenji
    Ichino, Manabu
    Sasaki, Hitomi
    Sumitomo, Makoto
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [48] Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Superiority over laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
    Shiroki, Ryoichi
    Fukami, Naohiko
    Fukaya, Kosuke
    Kusaka, Mamoru
    Natsume, Takahiro
    Ichihara, Takashi
    Toyama, Hiroshi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 (02) : 122 - 131
  • [49] Perioperative outcomes following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in elderly patients
    Sharma, Gopal
    Shah, Milap
    Ahluwalia, Puneet
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Bhandari, Mahendra
    Ahlawat, Rajesh
    Rawal, Sudhir
    Buffi, Nicolo M.
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishanan
    Porter, James R.
    Rogers, Craig
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Abaza, Ronney
    Rha, Khoon Ho
    Moon, Daniel
    Yuvaraja, Thyavihally B.
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Maes, Kris K.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Turkeri, Levent
    Gautam, Gagan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (11) : 2789 - 2798
  • [50] Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
    Jeong, Wooju
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lorenzo, Enrique Ian S.
    Oh, Cheol Kyu
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Rha, Koon Ho
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 (09) : 1457 - 1460