Psychosocial Predictors of Diabetes Risk Factors and Complications: An 11-Year Follow-Up

被引:5
|
作者
Helgeson, Vicki S. [1 ]
Orchard, Trevor J. [2 ]
Seltman, Howard [3 ]
Becker, Dorothy [4 ,5 ]
Libman, Ingrid [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Data Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[4] UPMC, Childrens Hosp, Pediat Endocrinol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Type; 1; diabetes; psychosocial factors; diabetes complications; UNMITIGATED COMMUNION; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; ADOLESCENTS; ADJUSTMENT; AGENCY; OUTCOMES; CHILDREN; TRAITS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1037/hea0000730
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The goal of this study was to use the risk and resistance framework to examine whether a set of psychosocial variables measured at age 12 in youth with Type 1 diabetes would predict the emergence of diabetes risk and complication variables 11 years and 13 years later. Method: We interviewed youth with Type 1 diabetes when they were average age 12 and followed them for 11 years until they were average age 23 and then average age 25. At age 12, we measured personality traits (unmitigated communion, unmitigated agency), relationship variables (parent relationship quality, friend support, friend conflict), indicators of psychological well-being (depressive symptoms, bulimic symptoms, self-worth), and self-care behavior. We used these psychosocial variables assessed at age 12 to predict diabetes risk factors, glycemic control, and the emergence of diabetes complications at follow-up. Results: Higher unmitigated agency, poor quality parent relationships, higher friend conflict, bulimic symptoms, and lower self-worth predicted one or more diabetes outcomes. When statistical controls for age 12 glycemic control were employed, unmitigated agency emerged as the most robust predictor of diabetes outcomes. Conclusion: Unmitigated agency, which involves an overly inflated view of the self and a cynical view of others, predicted poor diabetes outcomes over an 11-year and 13-year period. The processes by which unmitigated agency could influence health are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 576
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CANCER OF THE MOUTH - 11-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF 800 CASES
    STURDY, DE
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1959, 13 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [32] 11-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF 300 YOUNG OPIOID ADDICTS
    HAASTRUP, S
    JEPSEN, PW
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 77 (01) : 22 - 26
  • [33] Injury risk in young psychiatric outpatientsAn 11-year follow-up of 302 adolescents
    Ville M. Mattila
    Mirjami Pelkonen
    Markus Henriksson
    Mauri Marttunen
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2008, 43 : 627 - 634
  • [34] Predictors of Change in Serum TSH after Iodine Fortification: An 11-Year Follow-Up to the DanThyr Study
    Bjergved, Lena
    Jorgensen, Torben
    Perrild, Hans
    Carle, Allan
    Cerqueira, Charlotte
    Krejbjerg, Anne
    Laurberg, Peter
    Ovesen, Lars
    Pedersen, Inge Bulow
    Rasmussen, Lone Banke
    Knudsen, Nils
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2012, 97 (11): : 4022 - 4029
  • [35] 11-YEAR FOLLOW-UP ON 64 SUBJECTS WITH M-COMPONENTS
    AXELSSON, U
    ACTA MEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 201 (03): : 173 - 175
  • [36] Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: An 11-year follow-up
    Dutton, DG
    Bodnarchuk, M
    Kropp, R
    Hart, SD
    Ogloff, JRP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 41 (01) : 9 - 23
  • [37] AN 11-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF ADJUSTMENT TO SPINAL-CORD INJURY
    CREWE, NM
    KRAUSE, JS
    REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 35 (04) : 205 - 210
  • [38] A Case of Dissociative Fugue and General Amnesia with an 11-Year Follow-Up
    Helmes, Edward
    Brown, Julie-May
    Elliott, Linda
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & DISSOCIATION, 2015, 16 (01) : 100 - 113
  • [39] An 11-year follow-up of motor speech abilities in elderly adults
    Parnell, MM
    Amerman, JD
    CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 1996, 10 (02) : 103 - 118