Application of the ANP to the prioritization of project stakeholders in the context of responsible research and innovation

被引:12
|
作者
Ligardo-Herrera, Ivan [1 ,2 ]
Gomez-Navarro, Tomas [1 ]
Gonzalez-Urango, Hannia [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Energy Engn, E-46022 Valencia, Spain
[2] Univ Simon Bolivar, Fac Ingn, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
[3] Univ Politecn Valencia, Ingenio CSIC UPV, E-46022 Valencia, Spain
关键词
Stakeholders management; Analytic network process (ANP); Responsible research and innovation (RRI); ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION; RRI;
D O I
10.1007/s10100-018-0573-4
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper presents a methodology to assess the stakeholders' influence in a research project within the context of responsible research and innovation. The methodology is based on a combination of the multicriteria decision making technique analytic network process and the key areas of responsible research. The method allows ranking and ordering the project's stakeholders based on their influence upon its responsibility. The purpose of such an assessment is to help research teams to more efficiently devote their limited resources to stakeholder management. The procedure is applied to a case study of the Information and Communication Technology business sector. It is an ongoing project at an early phase of development. Influential stakeholders have been identified first, and have been further classified into groups based on their relative importance. The assessment of their influence has been based on up to 16 different criteria, mainly belonging to the framework of responsible research and innovation. In the case study, the most influential criterion was the Capability to promote public engagement, while Developers were found to be the stakeholders most contributing to the research project responsibility. However, as explained, this is a temporary situation, valid for the current project development situation. It may vary over time as criteria vary in weight and stakeholders vary in influence.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 701
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Responsible Research and Innovation in secondary school science classrooms: experiences from the project Irresistible
    Apotheker, Jan
    Blonder, Ron
    Akaygun, Sevil
    Reis, Pedro
    Kampschulte, Lorenz
    Laherto, Antti
    PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 2017, 89 (02) : 211 - 219
  • [22] Tailoring responsible research and innovation to the translational context: the case of AI-supported exergaming
    Blank, Sabrina
    Mason, Celeste
    Steinicke, Frank
    Herzog, Christian
    ETHICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 26 (02)
  • [23] The story of lead: a context for learning about responsible research and innovation (RRI) in the chemistry classroom
    Blonder, Ron
    Zemler, Esty
    Rosenfeld, Sherman
    CHEMISTRY EDUCATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 17 (04) : 1145 - 1155
  • [24] Research on the Application of Project Management Theory in Innovation and Entrepreneurial Projects
    Li, Xiaoyan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (IEMSS 2017), 2017, 29 : 1570 - 1575
  • [25] Stakeholders' views on an institutional dashboard with metrics for responsible research
    Haven, Tamarinde L.
    Holst, Martin R.
    Strech, Daniel
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (06):
  • [26] Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of 'Responsible Research and Innovation'
    de Saille, Stevienna
    JOURNAL OF RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2015, 2 (02) : 152 - 168
  • [27] The state of the responsible research and innovation programme A case for its application in additive manufacturing
    Ogoh, George Inyila
    Ben Fairweather, N.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & ETHICS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 17 (02): : 145 - 166
  • [28] Responsible research and innovation in information systems
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2012, 21 (03) : 207 - 211
  • [29] Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT - A Framework
    Turk, Ziga
    Sessa, Carlo
    Morales, Stephanie
    Dupont, Anthony
    INTERNET SCIENCE, (INSCI 2016), 2016, 9934 : 239 - 243
  • [30] Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review
    Mirjam Schuijff
    Anne M. Dijkstra
    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2020, 26 : 533 - 574