Aerodynamic wing shape optimization based on the computational design framework CEASIOM

被引:4
|
作者
Zhang, Mengmeng [1 ]
Rizzi, Arthur [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol, Dept Aeronaut & Vehicle Engn, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
关键词
parallelization; ASO; Collaborative design environment; Gradient-based optimization; Parametrization; Transonic wing design; CONCEPTUAL DESIGN; STABILITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1108/AEAT-04-2015-0098
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Purpose A collaborative design environment is needed for multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) process, based on all the modules those for different design/analysis disciplines, and a systematic coupling should be made to carry out aerodynamic shape optimization (ASO), which is an important part of MDO. Design/methodology/approach Computerized environment for aircraft synthesis and integrated optimization methods (CEASIOM)-ASO is developed based on loosely coupling all the existing modules of CEASIOM by MATLAB scripts. The optimization problem is broken down into small sub-problems, which is called "sequential design approach", allowing the engineer in the loop. Findings CEASIOM-ASO shows excellent design abilities on the test case of designing a blended wing body flying in transonic speed, with around 45 per cent drag reduction and all the constraints fulfilled. Practical implications Authors built a complete and systematic technique for aerodynamic wing shape optimization based on the existing computational design framework CEASIOM, from geometry parametrization, meshing to optimization. Originality/value CEASIOM-ASO provides an optimization technique with loosely coupled modules in CEASIOM design framework, allowing engineer in the loop to follow the "sequential approach" of the design, which is less "myopic" than sticking to gradient-based optimization for the whole process. Meanwhile, it is easily to be parallelized
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 273
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AERODYNAMIC SHAPE DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION - STATUS AND TRENDS
    DULIKRAVICH, GS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1992, 29 (06): : 1020 - 1026
  • [42] RANS-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing with Overset Meshes
    Secco, Ney R.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2019, 56 (01): : 217 - 227
  • [43] Comparison of optimization algorithms for aerodynamic shape design
    Obayashi, S
    Tsukahara, T
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1997, 35 (08) : 1413 - 1415
  • [44] Development of an Engineering Education Framework for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization
    Kwon, Hyung-Il
    Kim, Saji
    Lee, Hakjin
    Ryu, Minseok
    Kim, Taehee
    Choi, Seongim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AERONAUTICAL AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2013, 14 (04) : 297 - 309
  • [45] Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft
    Li, Li
    Bai, Junqiang
    Qu, Feng
    [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2022, 59 (05): : 1179 - 1194
  • [46] Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing Benchmark
    Lyu, Zhoujie
    Kenway, Gaetan K. W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2015, 53 (04) : 968 - 985
  • [47] Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Investigations of the Common Research Model Wing
    Kenway, Gaetan K. W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (01) : 113 - 128
  • [48] Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an Adaptive Morphing Trailing-Edge Wing
    Lyu, Zhoujie
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2015, 52 (06): : 1951 - 1970
  • [49] Multipoint Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Truss-Braced-Wing Aircraft
    Li, Li
    Bai, Junqiang
    Qu, Feng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2022, : 1179 - 1194
  • [50] Cross Validation of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Methodologies for Aircraft Wing-Body Optimization
    Reist, Thomas A.
    Koo, David
    Zingg, David W.
    Bochud, Pascal
    Castonguay, Patrice
    Leblond, David
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2020, 58 (06) : 2581 - 2595