Atypical embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy: high prevalence and association with embryo development

被引:131
|
作者
Wirka, Kelly Athayde [1 ]
Chen, Alice A. [1 ]
Conaghan, Joe [2 ]
Ivani, Kristen [3 ]
Gvakharia, Marina [4 ]
Behr, Barry [5 ]
Suraj, Vaishali [1 ]
Tan, Lei [1 ]
Shen, Shehua [1 ]
机构
[1] Auxogyn, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[2] Pacific Fertil Ctr, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Ctr Reprod Sci, Bay Area, San Ramon, CA USA
[4] Palo Alto Med Fdn, San Jose, CA USA
[5] Stanford Fertil & Reprod Med Ctr, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
Atypical phenotype; abnormal embryo development; embryo selection; embryo viability assessment; time-lapse microscopy; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; HUMAN OOCYTES; MORPHOLOGY; SELECTION; INTEROBSERVER; IMPLANTATION; CULTURE; TRIAL; STAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.050
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To characterize atypical dynamic embryo phenotypes identified by time-lapse microscopy, evaluate their prevalence, and determine their association with embryo development. Design: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. Setting: Five IVF clinics in the United States. Patient(s): Sixty-seven women undergoing IVF treatment with 651 embryos. Intervention(s): Embryo videos were retrospectively analyzed for atypical phenotypes. Main Outcome Measure(s): Identification of four groups of atypical embryo phenotypes: abnormal syngamy (AS), abnormal first cytokinesis (A1(cyt)), abnormal cleavage (AC), and chaotic cleavage (CC). Prevalence and association with embryo morphology and development potential were evaluated. Result(s): A high prevalence of atypical phenotypes was observed among embryos: AS 25.1% (163/649), A1cyt 31.0% (195/639), AC 18% (115/639) and CC 15% (96/639). A high percentage of embryos with atypical phenotype(s) had good quality on day 3 (overall grade good or fair): AS 78.6% (70/89); A1(cyt) 79.7% (94/119), AC 86.4% (70/81), and CC 35.2% (19/54), but the blastocyst formation rates for these embryos were significantly lower compared with their respective control groups: AS 21.5% vs. 44.9%, A1(cyt) 21.7% vs. 44.6%, AC 11.7% vs. 43.1%, and CC 14.0% vs. 42.3%. Conclusion(s): Embryos exhibiting atypical phenotypes are highly prevalent in human embryos and show significantly lower developmental potential than control embryos. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1637 / U495
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DO EMBRYO TIME-LAPSE PARAMETERS PREDICT EUPLOID EMBRYO TRANSFER OUTCOMES?.
    Drejza, M. A.
    Kort, J. D.
    Behr, B.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E157 - E158
  • [22] A time-lapse embryo dataset for morphokinetic parameter prediction
    Gomez, Tristan
    Feyeux, Magalie
    Boulant, Justine
    Normand, Nicolas
    David, Laurent
    Paul-Gilloteaux, Perrine
    Freour, Thomas
    Mouchere, Harold
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2022, 42
  • [23] Is there a relationship between time-lapse parameters and embryo sex?
    Bronet, Fernando
    Nogales, Maria-Carmen
    Martinez, Eva
    Ariza, Marta
    Rubio, Carmen
    Garcia-Velasco, Juan-Antonio
    Meseguer, Marcos
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (02) : 396 - 401
  • [24] Assessment of embryo morphology and developmental dynamics by time-lapse microscopy: is there a relation to implantation and ploidy?
    Zaninovic, Nikica
    Irani, Mohamad
    Meseguer, Marcos
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (05) : 722 - 729
  • [25] Time-lapse monitoring as a tool for clinical embryo assessment
    Kirkegaard, Kirstine
    Agerholm, Inge E.
    Ingerslev, Hans Jakob
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27 (05) : 1277 - 1285
  • [26] Improved embryo development in a time-lapse incubator system evaluated by randomized comparison of surplus embryo development to the blastocyst stage
    Speksnijder, J.
    van de Werken, C.
    de Jong, S. M.
    Dons, A. J. A. M.
    Laven, J. S. E.
    Baart, E. B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 : I39 - I39
  • [27] Influence of age and AMH on early embryo development realized by time-lapse imaging
    Liebenthron, J.
    Montag, M.
    Koester, M.
    Toth, B.
    Reinsberg, J.
    van der Ven, H.
    Strowitzki, T.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [28] Development and Reliability Evaluation of Embryo Monitoring System using Time-Lapse Cinematography
    Miyata, Shizuka
    Park, Choong Sik
    Sando, Yusuke
    Fujiki, Yuta
    Saeki, Kazuhiro
    Kato, Nobuhiro
    [J]. ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 5 (05) : 83 - 87
  • [29] Time-lapse and aCGH, Is There Any Connection between Ploidy and Embryo Cleavage Timing on Early Stages of Embryo Development?
    Semeniuk, L.
    Mazur, P.
    Mikitenko, D.
    Nagorny, V.
    Zukin, V.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (03) : S6 - S6
  • [30] Embryo quality assessment by respiration rate measurements and image analysis of time-lapse images during embryo development
    Gundersen, J. K.
    Ramsing, N. B.
    Callesen, H.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (01) : 119 - 119