Managed care and inpatient mortality in adults: effect of primary payer

被引:2
|
作者
Hines, Anika L. [1 ,2 ]
Raetzman, Susan O. [1 ]
Barrett, Marguerite L. [3 ]
Moy, Ernest [4 ,5 ]
Andrews, Roxanne M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Truven Hlth Analyt, 7700 Old Georgetown Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] ML Barrett Inc, Del Mar, CA USA
[4] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA
[5] Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Hyattsville, MD 20782 USA
来源
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Managed care; Inpatient mortality; Fee for service; MEDICARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-017-2062-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Because managed care is increasingly prevalent in health care finance and delivery, it is important to ascertain its effects on health care quality relative to that of fee-for-service plans. Some stakeholders are concerned that basing gatekeeping, provider selection, and utilization management on cost may lower quality of care. To date, research on this topic has been inconclusive, largely because of variation in research methods and covariates. Patient age has been the only consistently evaluated outcome predictor. This study provides a comprehensive assessment of the association between managed care and inpatient mortality for Medicare and privately insured patients. Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to examine the association between managed care and inpatient mortality for four common inpatient conditions. Data from the 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases for 11 states were linked to data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database. Hospital discharges were categorized as managed care or fee for service. A phased approach to multivariate logistic modeling examined the likelihood of inpatient mortality when adjusting for individual patient and hospital characteristics and for county fixed effects. Results: Results showed different effects of managed care for Medicare and privately insured patients. Privately insured patients in managed care had an advantage over their fee-for-service counterparts in inpatient mortality for acute myocardial infarction, stroke, pneumonia, and congestive heart failure; no such advantage was found for the Medicare managed care population. To the extent that the study showed a protective effect of privately insured managed care, it was driven by individuals aged 65 years and older, who had consistently better outcomes than their non-managed care counterparts. Conclusions: Privately insured patients in managed care plans, especially older adults, had better outcomes than those in fee-for-service plans. Patients in Medicare managed care had outcomes similar to those in Medicare FFS. Additional research is needed to understand the role of patient selection, hospital quality, and differences among county populations in the decreased odds of inpatient mortality among patients in private managed care and to determine why this result does not hold for Medicare.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards managed primary care: The role and experience of primary care organisations
    Dowling, Bernard
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2007, 15 (02) : 181 - 182
  • [42] Managed care and primary physician satisfaction
    Grembowski, D
    Ulrich, CM
    Paschane, D
    Diehr, P
    Katon, W
    Martin, D
    Patrick, DL
    Velicer, C
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 16 (05): : 383 - 393
  • [43] Payer Mix Association with Primary Care Telehealth Service Trajectories
    Lewis, Kanna
    Tawiah, Edward
    Wilson, Craig
    Thompson, Joseph
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2024, 22
  • [44] Assessing use of primary health care services by very low-income adults in a managed care program
    Diamant, AL
    Brook, RH
    Fink, A
    Gelberg, L
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (09) : 1222 - 1227
  • [45] Medicaid insurance as primary payer predicts increased mortality after total hip replacement in the state inpatient databases of California, Florida and New York
    Xu, Hannah F.
    White, Robert S.
    Sastow, Dahniel L.
    Andreae, Michael H.
    Gaber-Baylis, Licia K.
    Turnbull, Zachary A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2017, 43 : 24 - 32
  • [46] Quality of care for primary care patients with depression in managed care
    Wells, KB
    Schoenbaum, M
    Unützer, J
    Lagomasino, IT
    Rubenstein, LV
    ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1999, 8 (06) : 529 - 536
  • [47] Inpatient Mortality and Payer Status for Open Abdominal Aortic Repair and Lower Extremity Bypass in the VQI
    Ulloa, Jesus G.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    Tseng, Chi-Hong
    Woo, Karen
    Rigberg, David
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 63 (06) : 171S - 172S
  • [48] MANAGED CARE - THE DERMATOLOGIST AS A PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDER
    KIRSNER, RS
    FEDERMAN, DG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 33 (03) : 535 - 537
  • [49] Creating a managed care partnership in primary care geriatrics
    Ladden, M
    Mendis, P
    Fabiszewski, K
    Preston, M
    Yesner, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1998, 46 (09) : S57 - S57
  • [50] Psychiatry, primary care, and managed care: An executive perspective
    Astrachan, BM
    Flaherty, JA
    Astrachan, JH
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 1997, 27 (06) : 440 - 443