What Does the Public Think? Examining Plastic Surgery Perceptions through the Twitterverse

被引:33
|
作者
Kalandar, Abeer
Al-Youha, Sarah
Al-Halabi, Becher
Williams, Jason
机构
[1] Dalhousie Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
PROFESSIONAL PERCEPTIONS; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; CAMPAIGN; REALITY;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000004484
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Twitter is a recognized social media platform for communication of health information. Rime reported that emotion is the main motive for social sharing. This study is a content analysis of Twitter that was performed to identify the public's perceptions and attitudes toward plastic surgery and the emotional triggers that drive social sharing of plastic surgery information. Methods: Tweets containing #PlasticSurgery or Plastic Surgery were archived randomly from August 1, 2014, to December 30, 2016 (n = 4548). Tweets were categorized according to tweet author, specialty, topic, content, multimedia included, emotion, tone, accuracy of information, source, and retweet rate. Statistical analysis was performed to detect significant patterns. Results: Tweets on cosmetic surgery (74 percent) were shared mostly on Twitter, predominantly posted by the public [n = 1611 (48 percent)]. More than 13 percent of posts contained celebrity news and 42.8 percent contained professional information and resources. The most frequent emotions shared and retweeted were relaxed/content (51.5 percent) and excited/interested (18.4 percent). Most tweets posted by the public contained inaccurate information [n = 1486 (80 percent)]. Only 154 (11.2 percent) of board-certified plastic surgeons' tweets were rated as most accurate. Conclusions: The majority of tweets posted on Twitter contained inaccurate information that can lead to misperception among the public. Understanding emotional triggers for social sharing provides insight into what is most appealing. To enhance public uptake and sharing of tweets, plastic surgeons can use these findings to promote the specialty using relaxed/content emotions or excitement in their social media posts.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 274
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What does the public think about language science?
    Wagner, Laura
    Patson, Nikole D.
    Awani, Sumurye
    [J]. LANGUAGE, 2022, 98 (04) : E224 - E249
  • [22] ANONYMOUS TESTING FOR HIV - WHAT DOES THE PUBLIC THINK
    SMITH, C
    NUTBEAM, D
    [J]. COMMUNITY MEDICINE, 1989, 11 (04): : 384 - 385
  • [23] What do the Chinese Think? Security Perceptions of the Chinese Public
    Joo-Youn, Jung
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF DEFENSE ANALYSIS, 2012, 24 (02): : 157 - 174
  • [24] Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
    Hyland, Colby J. J.
    Yates, Elizabeth F. F.
    Gadiraju, Goutam
    Dey, Tanujit
    Broyles, Justin Michael
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [25] Living anonymous kidney donation - What does the public think?
    Landolt, MA
    Henderson, AJZ
    Barrable, WM
    Greenwood, SD
    McDonald, MF
    Soos, JG
    Landsberg, DN
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (11) : 1690 - 1696
  • [26] What does the public think of placebo use? The Canadian experience
    Huston, P
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2004, 10 (01) : 103 - 117
  • [27] Incentives for living kidney donation: What does the public think?
    Kranenburg, Leonleke
    Weimar, Willem
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (04) : 500 - 501
  • [28] What does the French public think about inclusive education?
    Jury, Mickael
    Khamzina, Kamilla
    Perrin, Anne-Laure
    Serour, Natacha
    Guichardaz, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2021, 46 (04): : 362 - 369
  • [29] What does the public think of placebo use? The Canadian experience
    Patricia Huston
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2004, 10 : 103 - 117
  • [30] Managing stormwater runoff in Appalachia: what does the public think?
    Cockerill, Kristan
    Mohr, Tanga
    Anderson, William P., Jr.
    Groothuis, Peter
    Gu, Chuanhui
    Whitehead, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 62 (14) : 2418 - 2436