Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor Asn680Ser polymorphism on the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: an updated meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies

被引:35
|
作者
Tang, Huilin [1 ]
Yan, Yingying [1 ]
Wang, Tiansheng [2 ]
Zhang, Ting [1 ]
Shi, Weilong [1 ]
Fan, Rong [1 ]
Yao, Yao [3 ]
Zhai, Suodi [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Pharm, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharm Adm & Clin Pharm, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Third Mil Med Univ, Xinqiao Hosp, Dept Pharm, Chongqing 400037, Peoples R China
关键词
FSHR; Genetic polymorphism; Ovarian response; Meta-analysis; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; FSH-RECEPTOR; SER680ASN POLYMORPHISM; GENE POLYMORPHISMS; PHARMACOGENETICS; RESPONSIVENESS; GENOTYPE; EFFICACY; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-015-0600-5
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Asn680Ser polymorphism on the ovarian response to exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and clinical outcomes in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). A database search was conducted to identify the eligible studies that investigated the effect of FSHR Asn680Ser polymorphism on ovarian response and clinical outcomes. A pooled analysis was performed with the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and their respective 95 % confidence interval (CI) by the STATA software with random effects model. Sixteen cohort studies comprising a total of 4287 subjects were included. The number of retrieved oocytes was significantly fewer in subjects with the SS genotype at position 680, compared to subjects with the NN or NS genotype (WMD = -1.36, 95 % CI = -1.85 to -0.87). Lack of association was detected between the genotypes (SS genotype vs. NN or NS genotype) and clinical outcomes such as exogenous FSH dose (WMD = 98.96 IU, 95 % CI = -22.33 to 220.24), poor response (OR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.71-1.64), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 0.41-6.07), and clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.86-1.40). However, poor ovarian response and number of retrieved oocytes were significantly influenced by the Asn680Ser polymorphism in the Asian subjects. In addition, no publication bias was detected. FSHR Asn680Ser polymorphism might be a significant biomarker for predicting the number of retrieved oocytes and poor response, especially in Asian subjects. Other outcomes such as exogenous FSH dose, OHSS, and pregnancy rate were not influenced by FSHR Asn680Ser polymorphism.
引用
收藏
页码:1801 / 1810
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating influence of the genotypes in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn (rs6166) polymorphism on poor and hyper-responders to ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis
    Pabalan, Noel
    Trevisan, Camila Martins
    Peluso, Carla
    Jarjanazi, Hamdi
    Christofolini, Denise Maria
    Barbosa, Caio Parente
    Bianco, Bianca
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (122)
  • [22] Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor N680S polymorphism on the efficacy of follicle-stimulating hormone stimulation on donor ovarian response
    Lledo, Belen
    Guerrero, Jaime
    Turienzo, Azahara
    Ortiz, Jose A.
    Morales, Ruth
    Ten, Jorge
    Llacer, Joaquin
    Bernabeu, Rafael
    PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2013, 23 (05): : 262 - 268
  • [23] Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphism and ovarian responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET
    Jong Kwan Jun
    Ji Sung Yoon
    Seung-Yup Ku
    Young Min Choi
    Kyu Ri Hwang
    Seo Young Park
    Gyoung Hoon Lee
    Won Don Lee
    Seok Hyun Kim
    Jung Gu Kim
    Shin Yong Moon
    Journal of Human Genetics, 2006, 51 : 665 - 670
  • [24] Follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene polymorphism and ovarian responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF-ET
    Jun, Jong Kwan
    Yoon, Ji Sung
    Ku, Seung-Yup
    Choi, Young Min
    Hwang, Kyu Ri
    Park, Seo Young
    Lee, Gyoung Hoon
    Lee, Won Don
    Kim, Seok Hyun
    Kim, Jung Gu
    Moon, Shin Yong
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2006, 51 (08) : 665 - 670
  • [25] The effects of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) -29 and Ser680Asn polymorphisms in IVF/ICSI
    Paschalidou, Chrysa
    Anagnostou, Elli
    Mavrogianni, Despoina
    Raouasnte, Rami
    Klimis, Nikiforos
    Drakakis, Peter
    Loutradis, Dimitrios
    HORMONE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2020, 41 (02)
  • [26] Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor N680S polymorphism in the efficacy of follicle stimulating hormone stimulation on donor ovarian response
    Turienzo, A.
    Lledo, B.
    Guerrero, J.
    Ortiz, J. A.
    Morales, R.
    Ten, J.
    Llacer, J.
    Bernabeu, R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 330 - 331
  • [27] Clomiphene citrate resistance in relation to follicle-stimulating hormone receptor Ser680Ser-polymorphism in polycystic ovary syndrome
    Overbeek, A.
    Kuijper, E. A. M.
    Hendriks, M. L.
    Blankenstein, M. A.
    Ketel, I. J. G.
    Twisk, J. W. R.
    Hompes, P. G. A.
    Homburg, R.
    Lambalk, C. B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (08) : 2007 - 2013
  • [28] Effectiveness of human menopausal gonadotropin versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles: a meta-analysis
    van Wely, M
    Westergaard, LG
    Bossuyt, PMM
    van der Veen, F
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (05) : 1086 - 1093
  • [29] Updated meta-analysis of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) versus urinary FSH for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction
    Daya, S
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (04) : 711 - 714
  • [30] The N680S variant in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene identifies hyperresponders to controlled ovarian stimulation
    Nenonen, Hannah A.
    Lindgren, Ida A.
    Prahl, Alexandra S.
    Trzybulska, Dorota
    Kharraziha, Isabella
    Hulten, Mathilda
    Giwercman, Yvonne L.
    Henic, Emir
    PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2019, 29 (05): : 114 - 120