Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure -: N Engl J Med 2001;345:1435-1443

被引:33
|
作者
Rose, EA [1 ]
Hunt, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Falk Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1054/jcaf.2002.32944
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used primarily as bridges to cardiac transplantation, although some patients have been maintained long term on these devices and a few have recovered enough to be weaned. This trial was designed to evaluate their suitability as long-term myocardial replacement therapy in patients who are ineligible for cardiac transplantation. Methods and Results: One hundred twenty-nine patients with end-stage heart failure who were ineligible for cardiac transplantation were randomly assigned to receive an LVAD (Thoratec HeartMate; Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) or optimal medical therapy, with a primary end point of all-cause mortality. To be eligible, patients had to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure for at least 90 days despite attempted therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, diuretics, and digoxin; an ejection fraction less than or equal to 25%; and an exercise peak O-2 uptake less than or equal to 12 mL . kg(-1) . min(-1) (later increased to 14 mL . kg(-1) min(-1)). Patient eligibility was approved by a gatekeeper at the coordinating center. Results: Survival was significantly improved from 25% at 1 year in the medical therapy group to 52% in the LVAD group (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.78; P = 0.001). However, at 2 years only 23% in the LVAD group were alive (compared with 8% in the medical group). Fifty of 54 deaths in the medical group were caused by left ventricular dysfunction; in the LVAD group, of the 41 total deaths, 17 were caused by sepsis, 7 by LVAD failure, 4 by cerebrovascular disease, 2 by pulmonary embolus, and only 1 by left ventricular dysfunction. Serious adverse events were 2.35 times as frequent in the LVAD group, predominately caused by infection, bleeding, neurologic dysfunction, and device malfunction. NYHA class improved in all LVAD survivors at 1 year. Quality of life was significantly improved more compared with the medical therapy group by some indices, but not by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire. Conclusions: The use of an LVAD resulted in improved survival and quality of life in patients with extremely severe heart failure (75% 1-year mortality in the medical control group). However, only 23% of LVAD patients survived to 2 years and complications were frequent.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 60
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure
    Rose, EA
    Gelijns, AC
    Moskowitz, AJ
    Heitjan, DF
    Stevenson, LW
    Dembitsky, W
    Long, JW
    Ascheim, DD
    Tierney, AR
    Levitan, RG
    Watson, JT
    Meier, P
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (20): : 1435 - 1443
  • [2] The Use of Left Ventricular Assist Devices in End-Stage Heart Failure
    Blair, Ashley
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2018, 41 (04) : 376 - 382
  • [3] Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Treatment of End-Stage Heart Failure
    Seelandt, Katherine K.
    Farnsworth, Monica M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2009, 40 (04): : 150 - 151
  • [4] Implanting left ventricular assist device in end-stage heart failure with massive ventricular aneurysm
    Yao, Shaowen
    Qin, Yannv
    Yue, Jiarui
    Lu, Shichun
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (07) : 3332 - 3334
  • [5] The impact of patient selection on long-term outcomes of left-ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy for end-stage heart failure
    Lietz, K.
    Long, J.
    Kfoury, A. G.
    Slaughter, M. S.
    Silver, M. A.
    Milano, C. A.
    Rogers, J.
    Miller, L. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (02): : S131 - S131
  • [6] The impact of patient selection on long-term outcomes of left-ventricular assist device implantation as destination therapy for end-stage heart failure
    Lietz, K
    Long, J
    Kfoury, AG
    Slaughter, MS
    Silver, MA
    Milano, CA
    Rogers, J
    Miller, LW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 75A - 75A
  • [7] Hypomagnesemia after heart transplantation or left ventricular assist device implant for end-stage heart failure
    Racca, Vittorio
    Scaglione, Anna
    De Maria, Renata
    Panzarino, Claudia
    Santangelo, Maria Antonia
    Cipriani, Manlio
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 34 (08)
  • [8] LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE DOES NOT IMPROVE CELLULAR IMMUNITY IN END-STAGE HEART FAILURE
    Lundgren, Scott
    Lyden, Elizabeth
    Burdorf, Adam
    Hyden, Marshall
    Stoller, Douglas
    Zolty, Ronald
    Um, John
    Lowes, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 950 - 950
  • [9] Preliminary experience with the LionHeart left ventricular assist device in patients with end-stage heart failure
    El-Banayosy, A
    Arusoglu, L
    Kizner, L
    Morshuis, M
    Tenderich, G
    Pae, WE
    Körfer, R
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 75 (05): : 1469 - 1475
  • [10] Arterial stiffness is increased in end-stage heart failure patients on a left ventricular assist device
    Schofield, RS
    Pierce, GL
    Nichols, WW
    Aranda, JM
    Pauly, DF
    Klodell, CT
    Hill, JA
    Braith, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 133A - 133A