Social Protection for the Informal Sector in Urban China: Institutional Constraints and Self-selection Behaviour

被引:28
|
作者
Jiang, Jin [1 ]
Qian, Jiwei [2 ]
Wen, Zhuoyi [3 ]
机构
[1] Lingnan Univ, Asia Pacific Inst Ageing Studies, Div Grad Studies, 8 Castle Peak Rd, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, East Asian Inst, 469A Bukit Timah Rd Tower Block 06-01, Singapore 259770, Singapore
[3] Lingnan Univ, Asia Pacific Inst Ageing Studies, 8 Castle Peak Rd, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
INSURANCE PARTICIPATION; WORKERS; MARKET; SECURITY; UNEMPLOYMENT; DETERMINES; EMPLOYERS; MIGRANTS; PRIVATE; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1017/S0047279417000563
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The Chinese government has recently expanded the scope of urban social insurance programmes. However, social protection for the labour force of the urban informal sector, which reaches about half the number of urban workers, lags significantly behind. This under-coverage may be due to institutional constraints, particularly the household registration system hukou, and self-selection behaviour related to the limited benefits of social insurance. Drawing on a recent nationwide individual-level survey and city-level statistics, this study examines these two explanations for the under-enrolment on the social insurance programme. First, results suggest that hukou and the intergovernmental fiscal system are major institutional constraints. Second, self-selection behaviour in programme enrolment is verified. Employers in the informal sector are likely to opt out of social insurance. More importantly, employers in the informal sector, with rural or non-local hukou, are likely to opt out of social insurance, which suggests that self-selection behaviour is constrained by institutions. Such findings have important implications for broad theoretical and policy debates on universal social protection.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 357
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can intelligent collection integrate informal sector for urban resource recycling in China?
    Xue, Yanyan
    Wen, Zongguo
    Bressers, Hans
    Ai, Ning
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 208 : 307 - 315
  • [43] Chasing opportunity? Inequality of opportunity and educational self-selection of interprovincial migrants in China
    Zhou, Jiantao
    Hui, Eddie Chi-Man
    Peng, Huiwen
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2022, 69 (02): : 281 - 309
  • [44] Transforming gender constraints in the agricultural sector: The potential of social protection programmes
    Jones, Nicola
    Holmes, Rebecca
    Presler-Marshall, Elizabeth
    Stavropoulou, Maria
    [J]. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 12 : 89 - 95
  • [45] Dietary self-selection behaviour by the adults of the aphidophagous ladybeetle Harmonia axyridis (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
    Soares, AO
    Coderre, D
    Schanderl, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 73 (03) : 478 - 486
  • [46] Chasing opportunity? Inequality of opportunity and educational self-selection of interprovincial migrants in China
    Jiantao Zhou
    Eddie Chi-Man Hui
    Huiwen Peng
    [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2022, 69 : 281 - 309
  • [47] Appearances can be deceptive - Self-selection, social group identification, and political mobilization
    Gartner, SS
    Segura, GM
    [J]. RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1997, 9 (02) : 131 - 161
  • [48] Between-mode-differences in the value of travel time: Self-selection or strategic behaviour?
    Fosgerau, Mogens
    Hjorth, Katrine
    Lyk-Jensen, Stephanie Vincent
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 15 (07) : 370 - 381
  • [49] Self-Selection: A Key to a Better Understanding of Location Choices, Travel Behaviour and Transport Externalities?
    van Wee, Bert
    [J]. TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2009, 29 (03) : 279 - 292
  • [50] Who benefits from corporate social responsibility? Reciprocity in the presence of social incentives and self-selection
    Briscese, Guglielmo
    Feltovich, Nick
    Slonim, Robert L.
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2021, 126 : 288 - 304