Piggyback Intraocular Lens Implantation to Correct Pseudophakic Refractive Error After Segmental Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

被引:13
|
作者
Venter, Jan A. [1 ]
Oberholster, Andre [1 ]
Schallhorn, Steven C. [1 ]
Pelouskova, Martina [1 ]
机构
[1] Opt Express, London W1G 9AP, England
关键词
CATARACT-SURGERY; INTERLENTICULAR OPACIFICATION; POSITION; OUTCOMES; EXCHANGE; EYES; DESIGN; GENDER; LASIK; IOL;
D O I
10.3928/1081597X-20140321-02
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of secondary piggyback intraocular lens implantation in patients diagnosed as having residual ametropia following segmental multifocal lens implantation. METHODS: Data of 80 pseudophakic eyes with ametropia that underwent Sulcoflex aspheric 653L intraocular lens implantation (Rayner Intraocular Lenses Ltd., East Sussex, United Kingdom) to correct residual refractive error were analyzed. All eyes previously had in-the-bag zonal refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation (Lentis Mplus MF30, models LS-312 and LS-313; Oculentis GmbH, Berlin, Germany) and required residual refractive error correction. Outcome measurements included uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, distance-corrected near visual acuity, manifest refraction, and complications. One-year data are presented in this study. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent ranged from -1.75 to +3.25 diopters (D) preoperatively (mean: +0.58 +/- 1.15 D) and reduced to -1.25 to +0.50 D (mean: -0.14 +/- 0.28 D; P < .01). Postoperatively, 93.8% of eyes were within +/- 0.50 D and 98.8% were within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity improved significantly from 0.28 +/- 0.16 to 0.01 +/- 0.10 logMAR and 78.8% of eyes achieved 6/6 (Snellen 20/20) or better postoperatively. The mean uncorrected near visual acuity changed from 0.43 +/- 0.28 to 0.19 +/- 0.15 logMAR. There was no significant change in corrected distance visual acuity or distance-corrected near visual acuity. No serious intraoperative or postoperative complications requiring secondary intraocular lens removal occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Sulcoflex lenses proved to be a predictable and safe option for correcting residual refractive error in patients diagnosed as having pseudophakia.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 239
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Refractive changes produced by capsule contraction after piggyback acrylic intraocular lens implantation
    Hesse, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 28 (12): : 2229 - 2230
  • [22] Posterior capsule opacification after piggyback intraocular lens implantation
    Pfeifer, V
    Morela, K
    [J]. COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2001, 25 : 29 - 31
  • [23] Validity of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Albarran-Diego, Cesar
    Munoz, Gonzalo
    Rohrweck, Stephanie
    Garcia-Lazaro, Santiago
    Ricardo Albero, Jose
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 10 (11) : 1728 - 1733
  • [24] Visual outcomes after implantation of a novel refractive toric multifocal intraocular lens
    Shimoda, Talita
    Shimoda, Gilberto
    Hida, Wilson Takashi
    Nakano, Celso Takashi
    Motta, Antonio Francisco
    Guimaraees, Aline Silva
    Tzelikis, Patrick Frensel M.
    [J]. ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2014, 77 (02) : 71 - 75
  • [25] Prediction error and the effect of axial length on refractive status after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    Liu, Yiyun
    Qi, Hong
    Gao, Yufei
    Liu, Rongjun
    Sun, Tong
    Lan, Qianqian
    Hu, Chenxi
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [26] Validity of automated refraction after segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation
    César Albarrán-Diego
    Gonzalo Mu?oz
    Stephanie Rohrweck
    Santiago García-Lázaro
    José Ricardo Albero
    [J]. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2017, (11) : 1728 - 1733
  • [27] Retreatments after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: an analysis
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Makari, Sarah
    Ostenstad, Steffen
    Potvin, Rick
    [J]. CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 365 - 371
  • [28] Halo size after implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens
    Perez Carrasco, M. J.
    Alvarez-Rementeria, L.
    Hurtado-Cena, F. J.
    Heredia-Tejado, L.
    Dorado-Palacios, F. I.
    Puell, M. C.
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 91
  • [29] Outcomes of refractive error correction in pseudophakic patients using a sulcus piggyback intraocular lens
    Levinger, Eliya
    Mimouni, Michael
    Finkelman, Yaron
    Yatziv, Yossi
    Shahar, Jonathan
    Trivizki, Omer
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 422 - 426
  • [30] Piggyback intraocular lens implant to correct severe refractive error after penetrating keratoplasty in pseudophakes
    Park, J. C.
    Mundasad, M. V.
    Tole, D. M.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (02) : 272 - 272