Routing Protocols for Low Power and Lossy Networks in Internet of Things Applications

被引:65
|
作者
Sobral, Jose V. V. [1 ,2 ]
Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Rabelo, Ricardo A. L. [4 ]
Al-Muhtadi, Jalal [5 ]
Korotaev, Valery [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Beira Interior, Inst Telecomunicacoes, P-6201001 Covilha, Portugal
[2] Fed Inst Maranhao IFMA, BR-65010030 Sao Luis, MA, Brazil
[3] Natl Inst Telecommun Inatel, BR-37540000 Santa Rita Do Sapucai, MG, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Piaui, BR-64049550 Teresina, PI, Brazil
[5] King Saud Univ, CCIS, Riyadh 12372, Saudi Arabia
[6] ITMO Univ, St Petersburg 197101, Russia
[7] Av Joao Camargo,510 Ctr, BR-37540000 Santa Rita Do Sapucai, MG, Brazil
关键词
Internet of Things; low-power and lossy network; LOADng; routing protocol; RPL; CONTEXT-AWARE; RPL; MOBILITY; CHALLENGES; THROUGHPUT; DELIVERY; SYSTEMS; ENERGY; IPV6;
D O I
10.3390/s19092144
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) and its applications has taken the attention of several researchers. In an effort to provide interoperability and IPv6 support for the IoT devices, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) proposed the 6LoWPAN stack. However, the particularities and hardware limitations of networks associated with IoT devices lead to several challenges, mainly for routing protocols. On its stack proposal, IETF standardizes the RPL (IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks) as the routing protocol for Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs). RPL is a tree-based proactive routing protocol that creates acyclic graphs among the nodes to allow data exchange. Although widely considered and used by current applications, different recent studies have shown its limitations and drawbacks. Among these, it is possible to highlight the weak support of mobility and P2P traffic, restrictions for multicast transmissions, and lousy adaption for dynamic throughput. Motivated by the presented issues, several new solutions have emerged during recent years. The approaches range from the consideration of different routing metrics to an entirely new solution inspired by other routing protocols. In this context, this work aims to present an extensive survey study about routing solutions for IoT/LLN, not limited to RPL enhancements. In the course of the paper, the routing requirements of LLNs, the initial protocols, and the most recent approaches are presented. The IoT routing enhancements are divided according to its main objectives and then studied individually to point out its most important strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, as the main contribution, this study presents a comprehensive discussion about the considered approaches, identifying the still remaining open issues and suggesting future directions to be recognized by new proposals.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mobility Support for the Routing Protocol in Low Power and Lossy Networks
    Lamaazi, Hanane
    Benamar, Nabil
    Imaduddin, Muhammad I.
    Habbal, Adib
    Jara, Antonio J.
    [J]. IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS (WAINA 2016), 2016, : 809 - 814
  • [32] Transient Multipath routing protocol for low power and lossy networks
    Lodhi, M. Ali
    Rehman, Abdul
    Khan, Meer M.
    Asfand-e-yar, Muhammad
    Hussain, Faisal Bashir
    [J]. KSII TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 11 (04): : 2002 - 2019
  • [33] Survey on Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks
    Gadde, Deepak
    Chaudhari, M. S.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING RESEARCH (ICCIC), 2015, : 614 - 618
  • [34] Link Reversal and Reactive Routing in Low Power and Lossy Networks
    La, Chi-Anh
    Heusse, Martin
    Duda, Andrzej
    [J]. 2013 IEEE 24TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR, AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), 2013, : 3386 - 3390
  • [35] GROLL: Geographic Routing for Low Power and Lossy IoT Networks
    Won, Myounggyu
    Zhang, Wei
    Chen, Chien-An
    Stoleru, Radu
    [J]. INTERNET OF THINGS, 2020, 9
  • [36] Congestion Aware Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks
    Chahal, Abheyjeet Singh
    Gupta, Deepti
    Kaur, Ravreet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GRID AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2018, 11 (10): : 51 - 63
  • [37] Performance Assessment of the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks
    Lamaazi, Hanane
    Benamar, Nabil
    Imaduddin, Muhammad Iqbal
    Jara, Antonio J.
    [J]. 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS NETWORKS AND MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS (WINCOM), 2015, : 187 - 194
  • [38] CoAR: Congestion-Aware Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks for IoT Applications
    Bhandari, Khadak Singh
    Hosen, A. S. M. Sanwar
    Cho, Gi Hwan
    [J]. SENSORS, 2018, 18 (11)
  • [39] Analysis of Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks in IoT Real Time Applications
    Krishna, G. Gautham
    Krishna, G.
    Bhalaji, N.
    [J]. FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT TRENDS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (ICRTCSE 2016), 2016, 87 : 270 - 274
  • [40] Internet of Things: Architectures, Protocols, and Applications
    Sethi P.
    Sarangi S.R.
    [J]. Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2017, 2017