Joint inversion of InSAR, local seismic and teleseismic data sets for the rupture process of the 2020 Mw 6.3 Yutian earthquake and its implications

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Zhengsong [1 ,2 ]
Yi, Lei [3 ,4 ]
Luo, Jun [5 ]
Zuo, Kezhen [5 ]
机构
[1] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Seismol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Qinghai Inst Salt Lakes, Key Lab Comprehens & Highly Efficient Utilizat Sa, Xining, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Qinghai Inst Salt Lakes, Qinghai Prov Key Lab Geol & Environm Salt Lakes, Xining, Peoples R China
[5] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Earthquake Forecasting, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
The 2020 Mw 6.3 Yutian earthquake; Joint inversion; Rupture process; Radiation efficiency; Coulomb stress change; Crustal extension; FAULT SYSTEM; 2015; GORKHA; M-W; SLIP; AFTERSHOCKS; TIBET; AREA; CONSTRAINTS; MODEL; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229289
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
On 25 June 2020, a Mw 6.3 earthquake struck Yutian county. The earthquake nucleated on a normal fault in the northwestern Tibetan Plateau. Through jointly inverting local seismic and teleseismic waveform data as well as Interfemmetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) Line-of-Sight (LOS) displacement data, the spatiotemporal rupture properties of this earthquake were resolved to investigate and better understand regional crustal extension mechanisms. Inversion results show that this event ruptured along one main asperity concentrated within a depth range of 4.1-13.3 km with a maximum slip of similar to 0.9 m. The rupture front propagated initially around the hypocenter and then unilaterally toward the north. The whole process lasted approximately 8 s and released a total scalar seismic moment of 3.2 x 10(18) Nm (Mw 6.3). The energy-based average stress drop was estimated in the range of 1.9-3.0 MPa. The radiation efficiency was estimated to be 10.0-15.8%, which is relatively low, demonstrating that most of the accumulated strain energy dissipated during rupturing. We suggest that the earthquake was possibly related to the nearby Cenozoic volcano in consideration of the dissipated rupture of the source and the west-dipping causative fault located on the western edge of the volcano. Both the westward motion of the western Kunlun block and the eastward motion of the Kunlun-Qaidam block were responsible for the EW-trending crustal extension in the Yutian district. We supposed that the 2020 normal faulting earthquake was primarily attributed to the different velocities of the Kunlun-Qaidam block moving eastward. Additionally, according to an analysis of coseismic Coulomb stress interactions, the previous 2008 Mw 7.1, 2012 Mw 6.2, and 2014 Mw 6.9 Yutian earthquakes contribute small Coulomb stress disturbance on the hypocenter of the 2020 Mw 6.3 Yutian earthquake which suggest that previous Yutian earthquakes have a limited effect on triggering the 2020 event.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coseismic deformation of the 2021 Mw7.4 Maduo earthquake from joint inversion of InSAR, GPS, and teleseismic data
    Liu, Chaoya
    Bai, Ling
    Hong, Shunying
    Dong, Yanfang
    Jiang, Yong
    Li, Hongru
    Zhan, Huili
    Chen, Zhiwen
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2021, 34 (05) : 436 - 446
  • [22] Teleseismic inversion for rupture process of the 27 February 2010 Chile (Mw 8.8) earthquake
    Lay, T.
    Ammon, C. J.
    Kanamori, H.
    Koper, K. D.
    Sufri, O.
    Hutko, A. R.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 37
  • [23] InSAR coseismic deformation and tectonic implications for the 2020 MW6.3 Nima earthquake in Xizang
    Qiu J.-T.
    Ji L.-Y.
    Liu L.
    Liu C.-J.
    Dizhen Dizhi, 2021, 43 (06): : 1586 - 1599
  • [24] Joint inversion of InSAR and teleseismic data for the slip history of the 1999 Izmit (Turkey) earthquake
    Delouis, B
    Lundgren, P
    Salichon, J
    Giardini, D
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (20) : 3389 - 3392
  • [25] Rupture Process of the 1999 Mw 7.1 Duzce Earthquake from Joint Analysis of SPOT, GPS, InSAR, Strong-Motion, and Teleseismic Data: A Supershear Rupture with Variable Rupture Velocity
    Konca, A. Ozgun
    Leprince, Sebastien
    Avouac, Jean-Philippe
    Helmberger, Don V.
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 100 (01) : 267 - 288
  • [26] Rupture Characteristics Analysis of the 2020 Mw 7.4 Oaxaca, Mexico Earthquake Using Teleseismic, High-Rate GPS, and InSAR Data
    Wen, Guisen
    Li, Xingxing
    Zhao, Yingwen
    Xu, Caijun
    Xu, Guangyu
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [28] Rupture process of the April 24, 2017, Mw 6.9 Valparaiso earthquake from the joint inversion of teleseismic body waves and near-field data
    Ruiz, Javier A.
    Contreras-Reyes, Eduardo
    Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco
    Manriquez, Paula
    PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 2018, 279 : 1 - 14
  • [29] A hybrid source mechanism of the 2017 Mw 6.5 Jiuzhaigou earthquake revealed by the joint inversion of strong-motion, teleseismic and InSAR data
    Zheng, Ao
    Yu, Xiangwei
    Xu, Wenbin
    Chen, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Wenbo
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 2020, 789
  • [30] JOINT INVERSION OF THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF 2018 ML5. 7 XINGWEN EARTHQUAKE BASED ON SEISMIC AND INSAR OBSERVATIONS
    基于地震和 InSAR联合反演 2018 年ML5.7兴文地震破裂过程
    Zhang, Hai-Jiang (zhang11@uste.edu.cn); Gu, Ning (guning@sustech.edu.cn), 1600, State Seismology Administration (46):