Lgr5 expression is a valuable prognostic factor for colorectal cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Jiang, Yangyan [1 ]
Li, Wenlu [2 ]
He, Xin [3 ]
Zhang, Hongbo [4 ]
Jiang, Fangzhen [5 ]
Chen, Zhigang [6 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Dept UItrason Diag, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharmacol, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hematol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Third Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurol, Huzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast Surg, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Lgr5; Prognostic value; Clinical-pathological differences; Colorectal cancer; Meta-analysis; PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR; STEM-CELL MARKER; COLON-CANCER; OVER-EXPRESSION; OVEREXPRESSION; GPR49; STATISTICS; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-015-1985-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lgr5 has recently been identified as a reliable biomarker of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in colorectal cancer (CRC); however, its prognostic value is still controversial. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Wanfang databases with identical strategies to retrieve articles. We evaluated the impact of Lgr5 expression on survival of CRC patients through meta-analysis. Results: A total of 12 studies comprising 2600 patients revealed that Lgr5 overexpression was negatively associated with overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.73, 95 % CI: 1.28-2.33; P = 0.00) and disease free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.89, 95 % CI: 1.89-4.44; P = 0.000) in CRC patients. Subgroup analysis suggested that Lgr5 overexpression was significantly associated with worse OS in subgroups with IHC as the method of Lgr5 assessment (HR = 2.01, 95 % CI: 1.39-2.89; P = 0.001), patients from Asia (HR = 1.81, 95 % CI: 1.27-2.58; P = 0.000), and NOS scores greater than 6 (HR = 2.12, 95 % CI: 1.41-3.19; P = 0.000). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis showed that the estimated HR ranged from 1.6 to 1.86 upon excluding one study sequentially from each analysis. In addition, Lgr5 overexpression was significantly associated with deep invasion of CRC (OR = 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.17-0.87; P = 0.002), lymphnode metastasis (OR = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.76; P = 0.003), distant metastasis (OR = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.22-0.62; P = 0.000), and AJCC stage (OR = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.15-0.78; P = 0.01). However, Lgr5 overexpression was not correlated with tumor grade (OR = 0.75 95 % CI: 0.37-1.54; P = 0.433). Conclusions: This study shows that Lgr5 can be a valuable and reliable prognostic factor of colorectal cancer progression.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Expression of Lgr5, a marker of intestinal stem cells, in colorectal cancer and its clinicopathological significance
    He, Songbing
    Zhou, Hao
    Zhu, Xinguo
    Hu, Shuiqing
    Fei, Min
    Wan, Daiwei
    Gu, Wen
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Shi, Dongtao
    Zhou, Jian
    Zhou, Jin
    Zhu, Zheng
    Wang, Liang
    Li, Dechun
    Zhang, Yanyun
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2014, 68 (05) : 507 - 513
  • [22] Expression and Prognostic Value of Lgr5 in Patients with Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
    Xu, Haoyuan
    Li, Wanpeng
    Song, Xiaole
    Zhang, Huankang
    Wang, Huan
    Wang, Jingjing
    Hu, Li
    Li, Houyong
    Sun, Xicai
    Wang, Dehui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 : 2023 - 2034
  • [23] TCF7L1 Regulates LGR5 Expression in Colorectal Cancer Cells
    King, Carli M.
    Marx, Olivia M.
    Ding, Wei
    Koltun, Walter A.
    Yochum, Gregory S.
    GENES, 2023, 14 (02)
  • [24] Expression of the adult intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5 in the metastatic cascade of colorectal cancer
    Kleist, Britta
    Xu, Li
    Li, Guojun
    Kersten, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 4 (04): : 327 - 335
  • [25] Biological significance of full-length LGR5 in colorectal cancer
    Takahashi, Hidekazu
    Nishimura, Junichi
    Miyoshi, Norikatsu
    Haraguchi, Naotsugu
    Hata, Taishi
    Matsuda, Chu
    Yamamoto, Hirofumi
    Mizushima, Tsunekazu
    Doki, Yuichiro
    Mori, Masaki
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2018, 109 : 1254 - 1254
  • [26] Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zhigang
    He, Xin
    Xia, Wenjie
    Huang, Qi
    Zhang, Zhigang
    Ye, Jun
    Ni, Chao
    Wu, Pin
    Wu, Dang
    Xu, Jinghong
    Qiu, Fuming
    Huang, Jian
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [27] Targeting LGR5 in Colorectal Cancer: therapeutic gold or too plastic?
    RG Morgan
    E Mortensson
    AC Williams
    British Journal of Cancer, 2018, 118 : 1410 - 1418
  • [28] Targeting LGR5 in Colorectal Cancer: therapeutic gold or too plastic?
    Morgan, R. G.
    Mortensson, E.
    Williams, A. C.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (11) : 1410 - 1418
  • [29] Immunohistochemical Analysis of LGR5 Expression in Pediatric Liver Disease
    Khan, Zahida
    Orr, Anne
    Michalopoulos, George
    Ranganathan, Sarangarajan
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2015, 29
  • [30] Analysis of LGR5 Immunohistochemical Expression in Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Luga, A. C.
    Suarez, Y.
    Sabour, M.
    Theise, N.
    Harpoz, N.
    Zhu, H.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 163A - 164A