Residue analysis of 500 high priority pesticides: Better by GC-MS or LC-MS/MS?

被引:458
|
作者
Alder, Lutz
Greulich, Kerstin
Kempe, Guenther
Vieth, Barbel
机构
[1] Fed Inst Risk Assessment, Fachgrp 67, Residue Anal Unit, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Landesuntersuchungsanstalt Gesundheits & Vet Wese, Standort Chemnitz, D-09111 Chemnitz, Germany
关键词
tandem mass spectrometry; gas chromatography; liquid chromatography; electron impact ionization; electrospray ionization; multi-residue method; carbamates organochlorine pesticides; organophosphorus pesticides; pyrethroids; sulfonylureas; triazines; triazoles; ureas; food; environmental samples;
D O I
10.1002/mas.20091
中图分类号
O433 [光谱学];
学科分类号
0703 ; 070302 ;
摘要
This overview evaluates the capabilities of mass spectrometry (MS) in combination with gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) for the determination of a multitude of pesticides. The selection of pesticides for this assessment is based on the status of production, the existence of regulations on maximum residue levels in food, and the frequency of residue detection. GC-MS with electron impact (EI) ionization and the combination of LC with tandem mass spectrometers (LC-MS/MS) using electrospray ionization (ESI) are identified as techniques most often applied in multi-residue methods for pesticides at present. Therefore, applicability and sensitivity obtained with GC-EI-MS and LC-ESI-MS/MS is individually compared for each of the selected pesticides. Only for one substance class only, the organochlorine pesticides, GC-MS achieves better performance. For all other classes of pesticides, the assessment shows a wider scope and better,sensitivity if detection is based on LC-MS. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 865
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multiresidue analysis of pesticides in moringa pods by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS
    Dutta, Anirban
    Hingmire, Sandip
    Banerjee, Kaushik
    [J]. Journal of AOAC International, 2020, 103 (06): : 1486 - 1497
  • [2] Multiresidue Analysis of Pesticides in Moringa Pods by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS
    Dutta, Anirban
    Hingmire, Sandip
    Banerjee, Kaushik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AOAC INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 103 (06) : 1486 - 1497
  • [3] Analysis of neurosterols by GC-MS and LC-MS/MS
    Griffiths, William J.
    Wang, Yuqin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2009, 877 (26): : 2778 - 2805
  • [4] Finding of pesticides in fashionable fruit juices by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
    Tran, Kevin
    Eide, David
    Nickols, Susan M.
    Cromer, Michele R.
    Sabaa-Srur, Armando
    Smith, Robert E.
    [J]. FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2012, 134 (04) : 2398 - 2405
  • [5] Identification of novel pesticides and impurities by the combination of LC-MS with GC-MS analysis
    Zhang, SY
    Geng, Y
    Guo, YL
    Wang, H
    Lü, L
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2005, 23 (07) : 870 - 874
  • [6] Determination of 355 Pesticides in Lemon and Lemon Juice by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
    Aslantas, Sule
    Golge, Ozgur
    Gonzalez-Curbelo, Miguel Angel
    Kabak, Bulent
    [J]. FOODS, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [7] Comparison of GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS for the analysis of hormones and pesticides in surface waters: advantages and pitfalls
    He, Ping
    Aga, Diana S.
    [J]. ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2019, 11 (11) : 1436 - 1448
  • [8] Analysis of 136 Pesticides in Avocado Using a Modified QuEChERS Method with LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
    Chamkasem, Narong
    Ollis, Lisa W.
    Harmon, Tiffany
    Lee, Sookwang
    Mercer, Greg
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2013, 61 (10) : 2315 - 2329
  • [9] Acetonitrile-Ethyl acetate based method for the residue analysis of 373 pesticides in beeswax using LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS
    Issa, Muhammad M.
    Taha, Sherif M.
    El-Marsafy, Ashraf M.
    Khalil, Mostafa M. H.
    Ismail, Eman H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY B-ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE BIOMEDICAL AND LIFE SCIENCES, 2020, 1145
  • [10] LC-MS/MS AND GC-MS(/MS) BASED STEROIDOMICS
    Wudy, S. A.
    Sanchez-Guijo, A.
    Hartmann, M. F.
    [J]. REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2014, 49 : 47 - 47