Alternative water resources for utility-scale solar energy development

被引:4
|
作者
Murphy, D. J. [1 ]
O'Connor, B. L. [1 ]
Mayhorn, D. T. [1 ]
Almer, L. I. [1 ]
Bowen, E. E. [1 ]
White, E. M. [1 ]
Kim, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
关键词
alternative water; solar enery zone; competitive energy zone; utility-scale solar energy; solar energy; water demand;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.265
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Electricity generated from solar energy continues to increase throughout the United States, and several states in the southwestern United States are interested in the development of utility-scale solar energy to meet their established renewable energy portfolios. Water use by utility-scale solar facilities can be quite significant for some technologies, however, which is problematic considering that the best location for solar energy development-the southwestern United States-tends to be an arid environment. The goal of this study was to examine the feasibility of using alternative water resources (reclaimed wastewater and produced water in this study) to meet water demands for utility-scale solar energy development, focusing specifically on Solar Energy Zones (SEZs) and Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZs). Our results indicate that, on average, 100% of the projected demand for water at most SEZs and CREZs could be met by reclaimed wastewater if photovoltaics (PV) are installed. If concentrating solar power (CSP) is installed, fewer SEZs could meet their potential water demand from alternative sources. Only 10 of the CREZs were located near sources of produced water, but of those, 100% of the water demand at the CREZ was met in 8 cases, regardless of the technology installed. Overall, the results from this analysis indicate that alternative waters can play a prominent role in meeting water demand at solar zones in the arid southwest. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2501 / 2511
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dynamic Performance Enhancement of a Utility-Scale Solar PV Plant
    Arzani, Ali
    Arunagirinathan, Paranietharan
    Jayawardene, Troshani
    Venayagamoorthy, Ganesh K.
    2016 IEEE PES POWERAFRICA CONFERENCE, 2016, : 26 - 30
  • [42] Dispatch optimization of concentrating solar power with utility-scale photovoltaics
    William T. Hamilton
    Mark A. Husted
    Alexandra M. Newman
    Robert J. Braun
    Michael J. Wagner
    Optimization and Engineering, 2020, 21 : 335 - 369
  • [43] Assessing the system and investor value of utility-scale solar PV
    Ryan, Lisa
    Dillon, Joseph
    La Monaca, Sarah
    Byrne, Julie
    O'Malley, Mark
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 64 : 506 - 517
  • [44] Stochastic Simulation of Utility-Scale Storage Resources in Power Systems With Integrated Renewable Resources
    Degeilh, Yannick
    Gross, George
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2015, 30 (03) : 1424 - 1434
  • [46] Stabilising transient disturbances with utility-scale inverter-based resources
    Elliott, Ryan T.
    Arabshahi, Payman
    Kirschen, Daniel S.
    IET GENERATION TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION, 2020, 14 (26) : 6534 - 6544
  • [47] Utility-Scale Solar in the Great Lakes: Analyzing Community Reactions to Solar Developments
    Uebelhor, Emma
    Hintz, Olivia
    Mills, Sarah B.
    Randall, Abigail
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 21
  • [48] Reacting to the Rural Burden: Understanding Opposition to Utility-Scale Solar Development in Upstate New York☆
    Nilson, Roberta S.
    Stedman, Richard C.
    RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2023, 88 (02) : 578 - 605
  • [49] Coordinating Distributed Energy Resources and Utility-Scale Battery Energy Storage System for Power Flexibility Provision Under Uncertainty
    Kalantar-Neyestanaki, Mohsen
    Cherkaoui, Rachid
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2021, 12 (04) : 1853 - 1863
  • [50] Utility-scale energy storage in an imperfectly competitive power sector
    Virasjoki, Vilma
    Siddiqui, Afzal S.
    Oliveira, Fabricio
    Salo, Ahti
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88 (88)