Synthetic graft use in vaginal prolapse surgery: objective and subjective outcomes

被引:27
|
作者
Wetta, Luisa A. [2 ]
Gerten, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Wheeler, Thomas L., II [3 ]
Holley, Robert L. [2 ]
Varner, R. Edward [2 ]
Richter, Holly E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pk Nicollet Clin, St Louis Pk, MN 55426 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Womens Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[3] Univ S Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Womens Pelv Med & Reconstruct Surg, Greenville, SC USA
关键词
Pelvic organ prolapse; Surgery; Prolift (R) mesh; Graft; Outcomes; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; TRANSVAGINAL MESH; FLOOR DISORDERS; INCONTINENCE; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-009-0953-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This study reports 1-year outcomes in women who underwent transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery with Prolift(A (R)) transvaginal mesh. Pre- and postoperative objective vaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) and subjective symptom and impact assessments (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI)-20 and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ)-7, respectively) were performed. Postoperative vaginal tenderness, stricture, and patient satisfaction were also obtained. Paired t tests were utilized for analysis. Mean age was 61.8 +/- 9.8 years; mean follow-up interval was 425.0 +/- 80.0 days (range, 237-717). POP-Q measurements of Ba, Bp, and C were significantly improved (all p values < 0.001). PFDI and PFIQ subscale scores significantly improved (all p values a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 0.004). Thirty-five of 48 (73%) were completely satisfied, and two (4%) were not satisfied. Complications (n (percent)) included graft exposure (1 (2%)), dyspareunia (2 (4%)), and granulation tissue (3 (6%)). Women undergoing transvaginal repair of POP with the Prolift(A (R)) mesh system showed significant improvement in 1-year anatomic and subjective measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1307 / 1312
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of combined sacrocolpopexy and rectopexy using synthetic mesh implant for vaginal and rectal prolapse
    McCann, F.
    Shawer, S.
    Tyagi, V
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2022, 33 (SUPPL 1) : S135 - S136
  • [42] Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    John N. Nguyen
    Su-jau T. Yang
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2020, 14 : 415 - 421
  • [43] OUTCOMES IN VAGINAL PROLAPSE SURGERY USING SURGEON CONSTRUCTED MESH FOR REPAIR AUGMENTATION
    Haverkorn, Rashel
    Gilchrist, Alienor
    Murray, Sunshine
    Lemack, Gary
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2010, 29 (02) : 279 - 279
  • [44] Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    James C. Forde
    Bilal Chughtai
    Jennifer T. Anger
    Jialin Mao
    Art Sedrakyan
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2017, 28 : 1183 - 1195
  • [45] Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse
    Maher, Christopher
    Feiner, Benjamin
    Baessler, Kaven
    Christmann-Schmid, Corina
    Haya, Nir
    Brown, Julie
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (10):
  • [46] Obliterative Surgery for Vaginal Prolapse: An Update
    Max Cadena
    Gena Dunivan
    Current Geriatrics Reports, 2023, 12 : 22 - 27
  • [47] Laparoscopic Abdominopexy: Surgery for Vaginal Prolapse
    Gil Ugarteburu, Rodrigo
    Ruger Jimenez, Laura
    Rodriguez Villamil, Luis
    Blanco Fernandez, Rebeca
    Gonzalez Rodriguez, Ivan
    Cruceyra Betriu, Guillermo
    Pello Fonseca, Jose Manuel
    Mosquera Madera, Javier
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2019, 23 (02)
  • [48] Synthetic vaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse
    Iglesia, Cheryl B.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 23 (05) : 362 - 365
  • [49] Surgery for posterior vaginal wall prolapse
    Karram, Mickey
    Maher, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (11) : 1835 - 1841
  • [50] Prolapse surgery - vaginal versus transabdominal
    Petri, Eckhard
    Hamann, Moritz
    Heidenreich, Axel
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2007, 38 (04) : 277 - 281