Player Rotation, On-court Performance and Game Outcomes in NCAA Men's Basketball

被引:0
|
作者
Clay, Daniel C. [1 ]
Clay, Kylie E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
college basketball; NCAA; player rotation; player performance; game outcomes; personal fouls; team strength; home advantage; HOME ADVANTAGE; LOSING TEAMS; STATISTICS; TRAVEL; SEASON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Coaches differ in in how they use the talents of their players and player rotation is among their most strategically important game management levers; some substitute sparingly while others routinely go to a deep bench. This research examines the impact of size of rotation on team performance and success among 7,154 NCAA Division I Men's Basketball team performances collected over multiple seasons. Study findings demonstrate that depth of player rotation has a significant positive effect on game outcomes and that the relationship is conditioned by number of personal fouls, overall team strength and home court advantage. The pathways through which a larger rotation results in greater odds of winning include offensive rebounding, steals and overall defensive efficiency, all areas where the fresh legs, quick hands and sustained energy levels characteristic of a deeper bench can make a measurable difference. Advantages of a smaller core rotation are manifested at the offensive end of the court, notably in shooting percentages, ball control and overall offensive ratings.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 619
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Point shaving in NCAA Men's Basketball: Behavioral finance, scale, and deterrence
    Sanders, Shane
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2022, 34
  • [32] Point shaving in NCAA Men's Basketball: Behavioral finance, scale, and deterrence
    Sanders, Shane
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FINANCE, 2022, 34
  • [33] Estimating Production Efficiency in Men's NCAA College Basketball: A Bayesian Approach
    Rimler, Michael S.
    Song, Seongho
    Yi, David T.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS ECONOMICS, 2010, 11 (03) : 287 - 315
  • [34] Comparing Team Selection and Seeding for the 2011 NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament
    Gray, Kathy L.
    Schwertman, Neil C.
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN SPORTS, 2012, 8 (01)
  • [35] Exploring Game Performance in the National Basketball Association Using Player Tracking Data
    Sampaio, Jaime
    McGarry, Tim
    Calleja-Gonzalez, Julio
    Jimenez Saiz, Sergio
    Schelling i del Alcazar, Xavi
    Balciunas, Mindaugas
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [36] Differences in game-related statistics of basketball performance by game location for men's winning and losing teams
    Gomez, Miguel A.
    Lorenzo, Alberto
    Barakat, Ruben
    Ortega, Enrique
    Palao, Jose M.
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2008, 106 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [37] The impact of NCAA men's basketball probations on the quantity and quality of student applications and enrollment
    Groothuis, Peter A.
    Eggers, Austin F.
    Redding, Parker T.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 26 (08) : 657 - 660
  • [38] Modeling the winning seed distribution of the NCAA Division I men's basketball tournament
    Khatibi, Arash
    King, Douglas M.
    Jacobson, Sheldon H.
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 50 : 141 - 148
  • [39] Information and accuracy in pricing: Evidence from the NCAA men's basketball betting market
    Berkowitz, Jason P.
    Depken, Craig A., II
    Gandar, John M.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2015, 25 : 16 - 32
  • [40] Off-Season Screening of an NCAA Division 1 Men's Basketball Team
    Canavan, Paul K.
    Roncarati, Michael
    Lyles, Keke
    Kenney, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC THERAPY & TRAINING, 2012, 17 (05): : 28 - 32