CHALLENGES IN DEVELOPING SENSE & AVOID CAPABILITY FOR UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS

被引:0
|
作者
Zeitlin, Andrew D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mitre Corp, CAASD, Mclean, VA USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Umnanned Aircraft Systems will require a Sense & Avoid function to protect against collisions with other aircraft as well as various other hazards. Architectural alternatives in the distributions of functionality between aircraft and a ground control station make the development of requirements and standards more complex. A broad variety of candidate sensor technologies has potential to fulfill the surveillance portion of the system. The paper explores the capabilities and limitations of these technologies, and suggests deploying combinations of technologies to capitalize upon their respective strengths. A discussion of algorithmic requirements draws upon the experience of the Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) in the airspace. Differences and challenges in implementing an algorithm for a UAS are discussed. The broad range of UAS aerodynamic characteristics complicate the process of standardizing an algorithm for Sense & Avoid. In order to build a safety case supporting the certification of a UAS, its performance must be thoroughly evaluated. In the case of Sense & Avoid, flight testing cannot be sufficiently thorough, and instead, the simulation of the system for large numbers of aircraft encounters is recommended. The paper discusses the considerations in performing such simulations, and in modeling various components of the system and of the potential encounter geometries. Unlike TCAS, an encounter model cannot be constructed solely from observed data, as UAS are not yet performing the desired uses. The Sense & Avoid work within the RTCA SC-203 standards committee is described.
引用
收藏
页码:890 / 896
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Sense and Avoid Requirements for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Using a Target Level of Safety Approach
    Melnyk, Richard
    Schrage, Daniel
    Volovoi, Vitali
    Jimenez, Hernando
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (10) : 1894 - 1906
  • [12] Different paths to sense-and-avoid technology for unmanned aircraft
    Howard, Timothy L.
    Accardo, Domenico
    Su, Wei-Jen
    AEROSPACE AMERICA, 2015, 53 (11) : 42 - 42
  • [13] Sense and Avoid for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: Ensuring Integrity and Continuity for Three Dimensional Intruder Trajectories
    Jamoom, Michael B.
    Joerger, Mathieu
    Pervan, Boris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2015), 2015, : 860 - 876
  • [14] Improved Conflict Resolution Method for Unmanned Aircraft Sense-and-Avoid
    Jilkov, Vesselin P.
    Ledet, Jeffrey H.
    Li, X. Rong
    2016 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION FUSION (FUSION), 2016, : 2067 - 2074
  • [15] Unmanned Aircraft System Sense-and-Avoid Integrity and Continuity Risk
    Jamoom, Michael B.
    Joerger, Mathieu
    Pervan, Boris
    JOURNAL OF GUIDANCE CONTROL AND DYNAMICS, 2016, 39 (03) : 498 - 509
  • [16] Unmanned Aircraft Systems Capability Research Priorities
    Maguire, Peter
    Giese, Stefanie
    Carr, David
    Chahl, Javaan
    2013 IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV), 2013, : 708 - 712
  • [17] Unmanned Aircraft Systems and the Nordic Challenges
    Kramar, Vadim
    Roning, Juha
    Erkkila, Juha
    Hinkula, Henry
    Kolli, Tanja
    Rauhala, Anssi
    NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS OF DRONES, 2022, : 1 - 30
  • [18] Unmanned aircraft systems: challenges and opportunities
    P. Srikumar
    International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences and Applied Mathematics, 2014, 6 (3-4) : 195 - 202
  • [19] Unmanned aircraft systems: challenges and opportunities
    Srikumar, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SCIENCES AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014, 6 (3-4) : 195 - 202
  • [20] SENSE AND AVOID STRATEGIES FOR MODERN UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS
    Anastasiei, Traian
    Muraru, Adrian
    Nencu, Nicolae
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION: APPLIED TECHNICAL SCIENCES AND ADVANCED MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 3, 2010, : 358 - 363