Antimullerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth

被引:34
|
作者
Nelson, Scott M. [1 ]
Fleming, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Gaudoin, Marco [2 ]
Choi, Bokyung [3 ]
Santo-Domingo, Kenny [3 ]
Yao, Mylene [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Med, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Glasgow Ctr Reprod Med, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] UnivFy, Los Altos, CA USA
关键词
Antimullerian hormone; antral follicle count; live birth; prediction model; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION; PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; ASSISTED CONCEPTION; RESERVE; CYCLES; WOMEN; IMMUNOASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.032
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare antimullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) separately and in combination with clinical characteristics for the prediction of live birth after controlled ovarian stimulation. Design: Retrospective development and temporal external validation of prediction model. Setting: Outpatient IVF clinic. Patient(s): We applied the boosted tree method to develop three prediction models incorporating clinical characteristics plus AMH or AFC or the combination on 2,124 linked IVF cycles from 2006 to 2010 and temporally externally validated predicted live-birth probabilities with an independent data set comprising 1,121 cycles from 2011 to 2012. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Predictive power (posterior log of odds ratio compared to age, or PLORA), reclassification, receiver operator characteristic analysis, calibration, dynamic range. Result(s): Predictive power, was highest for the AMH model (PLORA = 29.1), followed by the AMH-AFC model (PLORA = 28.3) and AFC model (PLORA = 22.5). The prediction errors were 1% to < 5% in each prognostic tier for all three models, except for the predicted live-birth probabilities of <10% in the AFC model, where the prediction error was 8%. The improvement in predictive power was highest for the AMH model: 76.2% improvement over age alone relative to 59% improvement for AFC and 73.3% for the combined model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the AMH and the combined model had comparable discrimination (area under the curve = 0.716) and similar prediction error for high and low strata of live-birth prediction, with an improvement of 6.3% over age alone. Conclusion(s): The validated prediction model confirmed that AMH when combined with clinical characteristics can accurately identify the likelihood of live birth with a low prediction error. AFC provided no added predictive value beyond AMH. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 332
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Antimullerian hormone: prediction of cumulative live birth in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment for in vitro fertilization
    Hamdine, Ouijdane
    Eijkemans, Marinus J. C.
    Lentjes, Eef G. W.
    Torrance, Helen L.
    Macklon, Nick S.
    Fauser, Bart C. J. M.
    Broekmans, Frank J.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (04) : 891 - +
  • [22] A multicentre evaluation of the Elecsys® anti-Mullerian hormone immunoassay for prediction of antral follicle count
    Jacobs, Michael H.
    Reuter, Laura M.
    Baker, Valerie L.
    Craig, LaTasha B.
    Sakkas, Denny
    Surrey, Eric
    Doody, Kevin J.
    Jungheim, Emily S.
    Bayrak, Aykut B.
    Hund, Martin
    Verhagen-Kamerbeek, Wilma D. J.
    Pardue, Deborah
    Buck, Katharina
    Timm, Barbara
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2019, 38 (05) : 845 - 852
  • [23] Antimullerian Hormone Levels Are Strongly Associated With Live-Birth Rates After Assisted Reproduction
    Brodin, Thomas
    Hadziosmanovic, Nermin
    Berglund, Lars
    Olovsson, Matts
    Holte, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2013, 98 (03): : 1107 - 1114
  • [24] COMPARISON OF ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT ACROSS THE MENSTRUAL CYCLE WITH ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE AND OVARIAN RESPONSE TO CONTROLLED HYPERSTIMULATION RELATED TO OVARIAN RESERVE.
    Massin, N.
    Amand, G.
    Villette, C.
    Dessapt, A.
    Vialle, C. Pietin
    Bry, H.
    Pasquier, M.
    Haddad, B.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E248 - E248
  • [25] Antimullerian hormone levels and antral follicle counts are not reduced compared with community controls in patients with rigorously defined unexplained infertility
    Greenwood, Eleni A.
    Cedars, Marcelle I.
    Santoro, Nanette
    Eisenberg, Esther
    Kao, Chia-Ning
    Haisenleder, Daniel J.
    Diamond, Michael P.
    Huddleston, Heather G.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (06) : 1070 - 1077
  • [26] NEW AUTOMATED ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE (AMH) ASSAYS ARE MORE RELIABLE THAN THE MANUAL ASSAY IN PATIENTS WITH REDUCED ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT (AFC).
    Tadros, T.
    Tarasconi, B.
    Nassar, J.
    Benhaim, J.
    Taieb, J.
    Fanchin, R.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (03) : E122 - E122
  • [27] A prediction model to select PCOS patients suitable for IVM treatment based on anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count
    Guzman, L.
    Ortega-Hrepich, C.
    Polyzos, N. P.
    Anckaert, E.
    Verheyen, G.
    Coucke, W.
    Devroey, P.
    Tournaye, H.
    Smitz, J.
    De Vos, M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (05) : 1261 - 1266
  • [28] Low antimullerian hormone (AMH) is associated with decreased live birth after in vitro fertilization when follicle-stimulating hormone and AMH are discordant
    Ligon, Sarah
    Lustik, Michael
    Levy, Gary
    Pier, Bruce
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 112 (01) : 73 - +
  • [29] Comparison of antimullerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Klein, Bjarke M.
    Arce, Joan-Carles
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 103 (04) : 923 - U91
  • [30] AntiMullerian Hormone (AMH), inhibin B, ovarian volume, and antral follicle count as markers of ovarian damage in young women treated for cancer in childhood.
    Anderson, RA
    Bath, LE
    Wallace, H
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 : S272 - S272