Antimullerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as prognostic indicators in a personalized prediction model of live birth

被引:34
|
作者
Nelson, Scott M. [1 ]
Fleming, Richard [1 ,2 ]
Gaudoin, Marco [2 ]
Choi, Bokyung [3 ]
Santo-Domingo, Kenny [3 ]
Yao, Mylene [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Glasgow, Sch Med, Glasgow G31 2ER, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Glasgow Ctr Reprod Med, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] UnivFy, Los Altos, CA USA
关键词
Antimullerian hormone; antral follicle count; live birth; prediction model; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION; PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; ASSISTED CONCEPTION; RESERVE; CYCLES; WOMEN; IMMUNOASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.032
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare antimullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC) separately and in combination with clinical characteristics for the prediction of live birth after controlled ovarian stimulation. Design: Retrospective development and temporal external validation of prediction model. Setting: Outpatient IVF clinic. Patient(s): We applied the boosted tree method to develop three prediction models incorporating clinical characteristics plus AMH or AFC or the combination on 2,124 linked IVF cycles from 2006 to 2010 and temporally externally validated predicted live-birth probabilities with an independent data set comprising 1,121 cycles from 2011 to 2012. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Predictive power (posterior log of odds ratio compared to age, or PLORA), reclassification, receiver operator characteristic analysis, calibration, dynamic range. Result(s): Predictive power, was highest for the AMH model (PLORA = 29.1), followed by the AMH-AFC model (PLORA = 28.3) and AFC model (PLORA = 22.5). The prediction errors were 1% to < 5% in each prognostic tier for all three models, except for the predicted live-birth probabilities of <10% in the AFC model, where the prediction error was 8%. The improvement in predictive power was highest for the AMH model: 76.2% improvement over age alone relative to 59% improvement for AFC and 73.3% for the combined model. Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the AMH and the combined model had comparable discrimination (area under the curve = 0.716) and similar prediction error for high and low strata of live-birth prediction, with an improvement of 6.3% over age alone. Conclusion(s): The validated prediction model confirmed that AMH when combined with clinical characteristics can accurately identify the likelihood of live birth with a low prediction error. AFC provided no added predictive value beyond AMH. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 332
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antimullerian hormone: is the writing on the wall for antral follicle count?
    Nelson, Scott M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (06) : 1563 - 1564
  • [2] The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count
    Broer, Simtone L.
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Hendriks, Dave
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (03) : 705 - 714
  • [3] Discrepancy between antimullerian hormone and antral follicle count: "The winner is ... "
    Devesa, M.
    Martinez, F.
    Tur, R.
    Buxaderas, R.
    Gonzalez, C.
    Rodriguez, I.
    Boada, M.
    Coroleu, B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 325 - 326
  • [4] Have antimullerian hormone and antral follicle count been given the same opportunities?
    Martinez, Francisca
    Devesa, Marta
    Nolasc Barri, Pedro
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (02) : E9 - E9
  • [5] Antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) as predictors of the ovarian reaction in young healthy women
    Stelcl, Marcel
    Belaskova, Silvie
    Machac, Stepan
    Fiserova, Eva
    Hubinka, Vit
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2017, 161 : S50 - S53
  • [6] Have antimullerian hormone and antral follicle count been given the same opportunities? REPLY
    Arce, Joan-Carles
    la Marca, Antonio
    Klein, Bjarke Mirner
    Andersen, Anders Nyboe
    Fleming, Richard
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (02) : E10 - E10
  • [7] IS DAY 3 FOLLICLE STIMULATING HORMONE (FSH) USEFUL IN PATIENTS WITH NORMAL ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE (AMH) AND ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT (AFC)?
    Jones, T. L.
    Purdy, M. P.
    Khan, Z.
    Bleess, J. L.
    Stewart, E. A.
    Coddington, C.
    Shenoy, C. C.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 108 (03) : E220 - E220
  • [8] VALUE OF ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE AND ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT IN PREDICTING FERTILITY PRESERVATION CYCLE OUTCOMES.
    Emirdar, V.
    Turan, V.
    Moy, F.
    Bedoschi, G.
    Oktay, K. H.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E264 - E264
  • [9] The Performance of Serum Antimullerian Hormone and Antral Follicle Count in Predicting the Ovarian Response in Intrauterine Insemination
    Moro, Francesca
    Tropea, Anna
    Scarinci, Elisa
    Leoncini, Emanuele
    Boccia, Stefania
    Lanzone, Antonio
    Apa, Rosanna
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2015, 22 : 220A - 220A
  • [10] Correlation of antimullerian hormone levels with primordial follicle count in human ovary.
    Oktem, O.
    Sezen, D.
    Oktay, K.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 : S402 - S402