Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Pentobarbital Sedation for Transthoracic Echocardiography in Infants and Toddlers: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

被引:26
|
作者
Miller, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Ding, Lili [2 ]
Gunter, Joel B. [1 ]
Lam, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Lin, Erica P. [1 ]
Paquin, Joanna R. [1 ]
Li, Bi Lian [3 ]
Spaeth, James P. [1 ]
Kreeger, Renee N. [1 ]
Divanovic, Allison [4 ]
Mahmoud, Mohamed [1 ]
Loepke, Andreas W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, 3333 Burnet Ave,MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Womens & Childrens Med Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Div Cardiac Anesthesiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2018年 / 126卷 / 06期
关键词
CHLORAL HYDRATE SEDATION; PEDIATRIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ADVERSE EVENTS; UPPER AIRWAY; CHILDREN; ANESTHESIA; STRATEGY; OUTCOMES; UPDATE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002791
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Acquisition of transthoracic echocardiographic (TTEcho) images in children often requires sedation. The optimal sedative for TTEcho has not been determined. Children with congenital heart disease are repeatedly exposed to sedatives and anesthetics that may affect brain development. Dexmedetomidine, which in animals alters brain structure to a lesser degree, may offer advantages in this vulnerable population. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial enrolled 280 children 3-24 months of age undergoing outpatient TTEcho, comparing 2.5 mu intranasal dexmedetomidine to 5 mg oral pentobarbital. Rescue sedation, for both groups, was intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 mu g. The primary outcome was adequate sedation within 30 minutes without rescue sedation, assessed by blinded personnel. Secondary outcomes included number of sonographer pauses, image quality in relation to motion artifacts, and parental satisfaction. RESULTS: Success rates with a single dose were not different between sedation techniques; 85% in the pentobarbital group and 84% in the dexmedetomidine group (P = .8697). Median onset of adequate sedation was marginally faster with pentobarbital (16.5 [interquartile range, 13-21] vs 18 [16-23] minutes for dexmedetomidine [P = .0095]). Time from drug administration to discharge was not different (P = .8238) at 70.5 (64-83) minutes with pentobarbital and 70 (63-82) minutes with dexmedetomidine. Ninety-five percent of sedation failures with pentobarbital and 100% of dexmedetomidine failures had successful rescue sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine was comparable to oral pentobarbital sedation for TTEcho sedation in infants and did not increase the risk of clinically important adverse events. Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to be an effective rescue sedative for both failed pentobarbital and dexmedetomidine sedation. Dexmedetomidine could be a safer option for repeated sedation in children, but further studies are needed to assess long-term consequence of repeated sedation in this high-risk population.
引用
收藏
页码:2009 / 2016
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enhanced Protein Diet for Preterm Infants: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial
    Atchley, Courtney B.
    Cloud, Ann
    Thompson, David
    Blunt, Michelle H.
    Satnes, Kelli J.
    Szyld, Edgardo
    Ernst, Kimberly D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 2019, 69 (02): : 218 - 223
  • [32] Pregabalin and dexmedetomidine conscious sedation for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized double-blind controlled study
    Ibrahim, Ezzeldin
    Sultan, Wesameldin
    Helal, Saffa
    Abo-Elwafa, Hatem
    Abdelaziz, Ahmed
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2019, 85 (05) : 487 - 493
  • [33] Intranasal lidocaine for treatment of migraine - A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Maizels, M
    Scott, B
    Cohen, W
    Chen, W
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (04): : 319 - 321
  • [34] Effect of three different doses of intrathecal dexmedetomidine on subarachnoid block: a prospective randomized double-blind trial
    Mowar, Ashita
    Singh, Vishwadeep
    Pahade, Akhilesh
    Karki, Geeta
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 26 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [35] Comparison of Sedation between Dexmedetomidine and Propofol During Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Alizadehasl, Azin
    Sadeghpour, Anita
    Totonchi, Ziae
    Azarfarin, Rasoul
    Rahimi, Saeid
    Hendiani, Amir
    [J]. ANNALS OF CARDIAC ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 22 (03) : 285 - 290
  • [36] Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Nie, Juan
    Chen, Chanchan
    Xie, Jing
    Ding, Guicong
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [37] Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
    Juan Nie
    Chanchan Chen
    Jing Xie
    Guicong Ding
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [38] Intranasal dexmedetomidine improves postoperative sleep quality in older patients with chronic insomnia: a randomized double-blind controlled trial
    Wu, Jinghan
    Liu, Xingyang
    Ye, Chunyan
    Hu, Jiajia
    Ma, Daqing
    Wang, E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Comparison of the Cardiovascular Response to Sedation with Dexmedetomidine, Midazolam, and Etomidate in Phacoemulsification under Local Topical Anesthesia; A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Shoraibi, Mohadese
    Masoudifar, Mehrdad
    Shetabi, Hamidreza
    [J]. ADVANCED BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [40] RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR ENDOSCOPIC SEDATION IN CHILDREN
    TOLIA, V
    FLEMING, SL
    KAUFFMAN, RE
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 1990, 14 (03): : 141 - 147