Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Oral Pentobarbital Sedation for Transthoracic Echocardiography in Infants and Toddlers: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial

被引:26
|
作者
Miller, Jeffrey W. [1 ]
Ding, Lili [2 ]
Gunter, Joel B. [1 ]
Lam, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Lin, Erica P. [1 ]
Paquin, Joanna R. [1 ]
Li, Bi Lian [3 ]
Spaeth, James P. [1 ]
Kreeger, Renee N. [1 ]
Divanovic, Allison [4 ]
Mahmoud, Mohamed [1 ]
Loepke, Andreas W. [5 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, 3333 Burnet Ave,MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Biostat & Epidemiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Womens & Childrens Med Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Div Cardiac Anesthesiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2018年 / 126卷 / 06期
关键词
CHLORAL HYDRATE SEDATION; PEDIATRIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ADVERSE EVENTS; UPPER AIRWAY; CHILDREN; ANESTHESIA; STRATEGY; OUTCOMES; UPDATE; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000002791
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Acquisition of transthoracic echocardiographic (TTEcho) images in children often requires sedation. The optimal sedative for TTEcho has not been determined. Children with congenital heart disease are repeatedly exposed to sedatives and anesthetics that may affect brain development. Dexmedetomidine, which in animals alters brain structure to a lesser degree, may offer advantages in this vulnerable population. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial enrolled 280 children 3-24 months of age undergoing outpatient TTEcho, comparing 2.5 mu intranasal dexmedetomidine to 5 mg oral pentobarbital. Rescue sedation, for both groups, was intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 mu g. The primary outcome was adequate sedation within 30 minutes without rescue sedation, assessed by blinded personnel. Secondary outcomes included number of sonographer pauses, image quality in relation to motion artifacts, and parental satisfaction. RESULTS: Success rates with a single dose were not different between sedation techniques; 85% in the pentobarbital group and 84% in the dexmedetomidine group (P = .8697). Median onset of adequate sedation was marginally faster with pentobarbital (16.5 [interquartile range, 13-21] vs 18 [16-23] minutes for dexmedetomidine [P = .0095]). Time from drug administration to discharge was not different (P = .8238) at 70.5 (64-83) minutes with pentobarbital and 70 (63-82) minutes with dexmedetomidine. Ninety-five percent of sedation failures with pentobarbital and 100% of dexmedetomidine failures had successful rescue sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine was comparable to oral pentobarbital sedation for TTEcho sedation in infants and did not increase the risk of clinically important adverse events. Intranasal dexmedetomidine appears to be an effective rescue sedative for both failed pentobarbital and dexmedetomidine sedation. Dexmedetomidine could be a safer option for repeated sedation in children, but further studies are needed to assess long-term consequence of repeated sedation in this high-risk population.
引用
收藏
页码:2009 / 2016
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of dexmedetomidine and chloral hydrate sedation for transthoracic echocardiography in infants and toddlers: a randomized clinical trial
    Miller, Jeff
    Xue, Bin
    Hossain, Md
    Zhang, Ma-Zhong
    Loepke, Andreas
    Kurth, Dean
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 26 (03) : 266 - 272
  • [2] Ketamine Enhances Intranasal Dexmedetomidine-lnduced Sedation in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
    Qian, Bin
    Zheng, Wenting
    Shi, Jiawei
    Chen, Zihan
    Guo, Yanhua
    Yao, Yusheng
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2020, 14 : 3559 - 3565
  • [3] A randomized double-blind trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal esketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in young children
    Anna Nikula
    Stefan Lundeberg
    Malin Ryd Rinder
    Mitja Lääperi
    Katri Sandholm
    Maaret Castrén
    Lisa Kurland
    [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 32
  • [4] A randomized double-blind trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal esketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in young children
    Nikula, Anna
    Lundeberg, Stefan
    Ryd Rinder, Malin
    Laaperi, Mitja
    Sandholm, Katri
    Castren, Maaret
    Kurland, Lisa
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA RESUSCITATION & EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2024, 32 (01):
  • [5] Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol for Conscious Sedation in Awake Craniotomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial
    Shen, She-liang
    Zheng, Jia-yin
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Wen-yuan
    Jin, Tao
    Zhu, Jing
    Zhang, Qi
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 47 (11) : 1391 - 1399
  • [6] A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Combination Sedation for Transthoracic Echocardiography in Pediatric Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sun, Mang
    Liu, Hui
    Yu, Qing
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Jing
    Lei, Yao
    Zhao, Qing-yan
    Li, Shang-yingying
    Tu, Sheng-fen
    Wei, Guang-hui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (06) : 1550 - 1555
  • [7] Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Prakhar Gyanesh
    Rudrashish Haldar
    Divya Srivastava
    Prashant Mohan Agrawal
    Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari
    P. K. Singh
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2014, 28 : 12 - 18
  • [8] Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Gyanesh, Prakhar
    Haldar, Rudrashish
    Srivastava, Divya
    Agrawal, Prashant Mohan
    Tiwari, Akhilesh Kumar
    Singh, P. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2014, 28 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [9] A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for sedated auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing
    Reynolds, Jason
    Rogers, Amber
    Medellin, Eduardo
    Guzman, Jonathan A.
    Watcha, Mehernoor F.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 26 (03) : 286 - 293
  • [10] A Comparison of Oral Midazolam with Oral and Intravenous Diazepam for Conscious Sedation in Total Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial
    Medeiros, Jose A.
    Pereira, Anabela S.
    Pereira, Marta I.
    Lopes, Pedro N.
    Vaz, Antonio L.
    Motta, Elisa D.
    Almeida, Luis
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (05) : AB197 - AB197