Open Peer Review in the Era of Open Science: A Pilot Study of Researchers' Perceptions

被引:0
|
作者
Rath, Manasa [1 ]
Wang, Peiling [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Commun & Informat, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee Knoxville, Sch Informat Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Open Science; Open Peer Review; OPR; Scientific publishing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The quality of Open Access journals is an important issue in developing digital library collections. Traditional criteria, such as peer review, may not be able to identify the quality of peer-reviewed publications. Open peer review (OPR) has emerged as an innovation of open science. OPR is still at an early development stage with various models, from revealing identities of the author and the reviewer to publishing the entire peer review history of the accepted paper. This pilot study utilizes qualitative interviews to investigate researchers' perceptions and attitudes towards the emerging publishing model. Through semi-structured interviews with seven researchers, this pilot study reports on the thoughts and opinions of the interviewees towards OPR and proposes further studies on the potential of OPR in scientific publishing.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 318
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Researchers' perceptions towards the Open Science ecosystem: a preliminary study
    Antunes, Maria Luz
    Lopes, Carlos
    Borges, Maria Manuel
    Sanches, Tatiana
    [J]. IBERSID-REVISTA DE SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION Y DOCUMENTACION, 2021, 15 (02): : 47 - 56
  • [2] Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
    Wolfram, Dietmar
    Wang, Peiling
    Hembree, Adam
    Park, Hyoungjoo
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2020, 125 (02) : 1033 - 1051
  • [3] Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science
    Dietmar Wolfram
    Peiling Wang
    Adam Hembree
    Hyoungjoo Park
    [J]. Scientometrics, 2020, 125 : 1033 - 1051
  • [4] Open Science, Philosophy and Peer Review
    Peters, Michael A.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, 2014, 46 (03) : 215 - 219
  • [5] Tools and methods of innovation in the open science: open peer review
    Cassella, Maria
    [J]. AIB STUDI, 2018, 58 (01): : 95 - 107
  • [6] Peer review in the open access era.
    Harnad, S
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 228 : U356 - U357
  • [7] Knowledge and Perceptions of Open Science among Researchers-A Case Study for Colombia
    Pardo Martinez, Clara Ines
    Cotte Poveda, Alexander
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2018, 9 (11):
  • [8] The quest for transparent science: Open peer review
    Prager, Eric M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 2019, 97 (03) : 227 - 227
  • [9] Habits and perceptions regarding open science by researchers from Spanish institutions
    Olle, Candela
    Lopez-Borrull, Alexandre
    Melero, Remedios
    Bote-Vericad, Juan-Jose
    Rodriguez-Gairin, Josep-Manuel
    Abadal, Ernest
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (07):
  • [10] UK Psychology PhD researchers' knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of open science
    Pownall, Madeleine
    Terry, Jenny
    Collins, Elizabeth
    Sladekova, Martina
    Jones, Abigail
    [J]. COGENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 10 (01):