Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: Mangafodipir vs. superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

被引:25
|
作者
Kim, MJ
Kim, JH
Lim, JS
Oh, YT
Chung, JJ
Choi, JS
Lee, WJ
Kim, KW
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol Sci, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Brain Korea Project Med Sci 21, Severance Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Inst Gastroenterol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] NHIC Ilsan Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Goyang Shi, Gyonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; liver neoplasms; iron oxides; mangafodipir; contrast media;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.20174
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the mangafodipir-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced images for their ability to detect and characterize focal hepatic lesions. Materials and Methods: Unenhanced, mangafodipir-enhanced, and SPIO-enhanced hepatic MR images obtained from 64 patients were analyzed. A total of 121 hepatic lesions were included: 66 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 26 metastases, 14 hemangiomas, 5 cysts, 3 cholangiocarcinomas, 4 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs), 2 abscesses, and 1 adenoma. Two radiologists independently reviewed the two sets of images in a random order: 1) the unenhanced and mangafodipir-enhanced images (the mangafodipir set) and 2) the unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced images (the SPIO set). This study compared the accuracy of lesion detection, the ability to distinguish between a benign and malignant lesion, and the ability to distinguish between the hepatocellular and non-hepatocellular origins of the lesions using the areas (Az) under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The overall accuracy for detecting focal lesions was significantly higher (P<0.05) with the SPIO set (Az = 0.846 and 0.871 for readers 1 and 2, respectively) than with the mangafodipir set (Az = 0.716 and 0.766). Most of the lesions detected only with the SPIO-enhanced MR images by the readers were small HCCs. For lesions larger than 15 mm, the sensitivities of the two contrast enhancement techniques were similar for both readers. The accuracy of the mangafodipir and SPIO sets in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions was comparable. The accuracy for distinguishing between the hepatocellular and non-hepatocellular origins of the lesions was significantly higher (P<0.05) using the mangafodipir set (Az = 0.897 and 0.946) than using the SPIO set (Az = 0.741 and 0.833). Conclusion: SPIO- and mangafodipir-enhanced images were comparable for detection of focal hepatic lesions other than small HCCs, which were better detected on the SPIO-enhanced images. Mangafodipir-enhanced images are likely better than the SPIO-enhanced images for distinguishing between focal liver lesions with a hepatocellular or nonhepatocellular origin.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:612 / 621
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterization of focal liver lesions with superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: Value of distributional phase T1-weighted imaging
    Lee, JM
    Kim, CS
    Youk, JH
    Lee, MS
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2003, 4 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [22] Development of hepatomas in hyperplastic nodules induced in the rat liver: Detection with superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Yamamoto, H
    Yamashita, Y
    Takahashi, M
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (04) : 330 - 335
  • [23] Focal Eosinophilic Necrosis on Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced MRI
    Cho, Eun-Suk
    Yu, Jeong-Sik
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Joo Hee
    Chung, Jae-Joon
    Kim, Ki Whang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05) : 1296 - 1302
  • [24] Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI for the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: Is delayed imaging useful?
    Chung, JJ
    Kim, MJ
    Kim, KW
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2006, 23 (05) : 706 - 711
  • [25] Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16--slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Young Kon Kim
    Seog Wan Ko
    Seung Bae Hwang
    Chong Soo Kim
    Hee Chul Yu
    European Radiology, 2006, 16
  • [26] Detection and characterization of liver metastases: 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Kim, Young Kon
    Ko, Seog Wan
    Hwang, Seung Bae
    Kim, Chong Soo
    Yu, Hee Chul
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (06) : 1337 - 1345
  • [27] Hepatic adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: MR findings with superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MRI
    Beets-Tan, RGH
    Van Engelshoven, JMA
    Greve, JWM
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 1998, 22 (03) : 211 - 215
  • [28] Hepatocellular lesions with increased iron uptake on superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis: comparison of four magnetic resonance sequences for lesion conspicuity
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    Shimizu, Ayame
    Fujita, Takeshi
    Onoda, Hideko
    Yamatogi, Shigenari
    Washida, Yasuo
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 27 (06) : 801 - 806
  • [29] Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms-A Feasibility Study
    Sadat, U.
    Taviani, V.
    Patterson, A. J.
    Young, V. E.
    Graves, M. J.
    Teng, Z.
    Tang, T. Y.
    Gillard, J. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (02) : 167 - 174
  • [30] Detection of Macrophage Localization in the Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Using Ex Vivo Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Umetsu, Michihisa
    Goto, Hitoshi
    Nakamura, Yasuhiro
    Ota, Hideki
    Shimizu, Takuya
    Hashimoto, Munetaka
    Akamatsu, Daijirou
    Kamei, Takashi
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 68 : 344 - 350