Shared Decision-Making and Patient Control in Radiation Oncology

被引:55
|
作者
Shabason, Jacob E. [1 ]
Mao, Jun J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Frankel, Eitan S. [3 ]
Vapiwala, Neha [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn Hlth Syst, Dept Family Med & Community Hlth, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
shared decision-making; participatory decision-making; patient control; patient satisfaction; radiation oncology; BREAST-CANCER; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PROSTATE-CANCER; FOLLOW-UP; SATISFACTION; CARE; COMMUNICATION; COMPLEMENTARY; IRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.28665
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) has been linked to important health care quality outcomes. However, to the authors' knowledge, the value of SDM has not been thoroughly evaluated in the field of radiation oncology. The objective of the current study was to determine the association between SDM and patient satisfaction during radiotherapy (RT). The authors also explored patient desire for and perception of control during RT, and how these factors relate to patient satisfaction, anxiety, depression, and fatigue. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 305 patients undergoing definitive RT was conducted. Patients self-reported measured variables during the last week of RT. Relationships between variables were evaluated using chi-square analyses. RESULTS: Among study participants, 31.3% of patients experienced SDM, 32.3% perceived control in treatment decisions, and 76.2% reported feeling very satisfied with their care. Patient satisfaction was associated with perceived SDM (84.4% vs 71.4%; P < .02) and patient-perceived control (89.7% vs 69.2%; P < .001). Furthermore, the perception of having control in treatment decisions was associated with increased satisfaction regardless of whether the patient desired control. Increased anxiety (44.0% vs 20.0%; P < .02), depression (44.0% vs 15.0%; P < .01), and fatigue (68.0% vs 32.9%; P < .01) were reported in patients who desired but did not perceive control over their treatments, compared with those who both desired and perceived control. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study emphasize the value of SDM and patient-perceived control during RT, particularly as it relates to patient satisfaction and psychological distress. Regardless of a patient's desire for control, it is important to engage patients in the decision-making process. (C) 2014 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1863 / 1870
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Shared decision-making in psychiatry: a study of patient attitudes
    Nott, Josie
    Mcintosh, Aspen
    Taube, Clare
    Taylor, Mark
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05) : 478 - 481
  • [42] Communicating shared decision-making: Cancer patient perspectives
    Thorne, Sally
    Oliffe, John L.
    Stajduhar, Kelli I.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 90 (03) : 291 - 296
  • [43] Decision-making in nephrology: shared decision making?
    Lelie, A
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2000, 39 (01) : 81 - 89
  • [44] Value of patient decision aids for shared decision-making in kidney failure
    van der Sluijs, Anita van Eck
    Vonk, Sanne A.
    Bonenkamp, Anna A.
    Prantl, Karen T.
    Riemann, Aase T. C.
    van Jaarsveld, Brigit C. C.
    Abrahams, Alferso C.
    JOURNAL OF RENAL CARE, 2024, 50 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [45] Shared Decision-Making: The More the Patient Knows, the Better the Decision that Is Made
    Klein, Lloyd W.
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (08)
  • [46] The impact of patient decision aids on the shared decision-making in cancer treatment
    Lin, Wan-Shiuan
    Yang, Yuan-Hao
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S490 - S490
  • [47] Integrating Shared Decision-Making into Undergraduate Oncology Education: A Pedagogical Framework
    McLean, Aaron Lawson
    McLean, Anna C. Lawson
    JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2024, 39 (04) : 374 - 382
  • [48] Current level of shared decision-making in hepatobiliary surgical oncology (SAPACHA)
    Haaft, Britte H. E. A. ten
    Furumaya, Alicia
    Nooijen, Lynn E.
    Kazemier, Geert
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    Erdmann, Joris I.
    HPB, 2024, 26 (03) : 451 - 460
  • [49] Integration of Oncology and Palliative Care, a Forgotten Indicator: Shared Decision-Making
    Huillard, Olivier
    Colombet, Isabelle
    Montheil, Vincent
    Weiler, Fabienne
    Boudou-Rouquette, Pascaline
    Arrondeau, Jennifer
    Tlemsani, Camille
    Cessot, Anatole
    Giroux, Julie
    Alexandre, Jerome
    Goldwasser, Francois
    Vinant, Pascale
    ONCOLOGIST, 2015, 20 (09): : E26 - E26
  • [50] True shared decision-making in neurosurgical oncology: does it really exist?
    Jessurun, Charissa A. C.
    Broekman, Marike L. D.
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2023, 165 (01) : 11 - 13