Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and fused 18F-FDG-PET-MR images with DWI for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases of HNSCC

被引:41
|
作者
Heusch, Philipp [1 ]
Sproll, Christoph [2 ]
Buchbender, Christian [1 ]
Rieser, Elena [2 ]
Terjung, Jan [3 ,4 ]
Antke, Christina [5 ]
Boeck, Inga [6 ]
Macht, Stephan [1 ]
Scherer, Axel [1 ]
Antoch, Gerald [1 ]
Heusner, Till A. [1 ]
Handschel, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Fac Med, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Oral Maxillo & Plast Facial Surg, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Neuroradiol, Univ Hosp Essen, Fac Med, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Erwin L Hahn Inst Magnet Resonance Imaging, D-45141 Essen, Germany
[5] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Nucl Med, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[6] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Inst Pathol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); Lymph node metastasis; Ultrasound; PET/CT; PET/MRI; Diffusion-weighted MRI; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; BENIGN; PET/CT; US; MR; LYMPHADENOPATHY; METAANALYSIS; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-013-1050-z
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study aimed to compare F-18-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/MRI (F-18-FDG-PET-MRI) fusion images, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), F-18-FDG-PET/CT, and ultrasound (US) regarding their performance in nodal staging of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Eighteen patients prospectively underwent ultrasound examination, F-18-FDG- PET/CT, and MRI before oral tumor resection and bilateral neck dissection. PET data sets were fused with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for nodal detection were calculated for all the imaging modalities. Furthermore, the accuracy of the correct N-staging was calculated for all methods. Detailed histopathology served as the standard of reference. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for detection of lymph node metastases were 63, 99, 86, 96, and 95 % for ultrasound; 30, 97, 56, 92, and 90 % for F-18-FDG-PET/CT; 52, 96, 59, 94, and 91 % for F-18-FDG-PET-MRI; and 53, 97, 67, 95, and 92 % for F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI, respectively. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis detection between F-18-FDG-PET-MRI and F-18-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.839) and between F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI and F-18-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.286), respectively. US was significantly more accurate than F-18-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.009), whereas no significant difference was seen between F-18-FDG-PET-MRI and US (p = 0.223) or F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI and US (p = 0.115). The nodal stage was correctly rated by F-18-FDG-PET-MRI in eight patients, F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI in nine patients, US in 12 patients, and F-18-FDG-PET/CT in five out of 18 patients. Software-based fusion of F-18-FDG-PET-MRI and F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI may not increase nodal detection and N-staging performance in patients with oral malignancies compared to US and F-18-FDG-PET/CT. Surgical staging of cervical lymph nodes will not be replaced even by advanced imaging modalities in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 978
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of 18F-FDG-PET/CT on staging of cervical cancer
    Cegla, Paulina
    Urbanski, Bartosz
    Burchardt, Ewa
    Roszak, Andrzej
    Cholewinski, Witold
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 58 (01): : 17 - 22
  • [22] Preoperative 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of regional lymph node metastases in malignant melanoma
    Singh, Baljinder
    Ezziddin, Samer
    Palmedo, Holger
    Reinhardt, Michael
    Strunk, Holger
    Tueting, Thomas
    Biersack, Hans-Juergen
    Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (05) : 346 - 352
  • [23] Prospective evaluation of CECT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in detection of hepatic metastases
    D'Souza, Maria Mathew
    Sharma, Rajnish
    Mondal, Anupam
    Jaimini, Abhinav
    Tripathi, Madhavi
    Saw, Sanjiv Kumar
    Singh, Dinesh
    Mishra, Anil
    Tripathi, Rajendra Prasad
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 30 (02) : 117 - 125
  • [24] Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Patients with FUO
    Georga, Stamata
    Exadaktylou, Paraskevi
    Petrou, Ioannis
    Katsampoukas, Dimitrios
    Mpalaris, Vasilios
    Moralidis, Efstratios-Iordanis
    Arvaniti, Kostoula
    Papastergiou, Christos
    Arsos, Georgios
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (07) : 1 - 19
  • [25] Multiple Myeloma: 18F-FDG-PET/CT and Diagnostic Imaging
    Mihailovic, Jasna
    Goldsmith, Stanley J.
    SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (01) : 16 - 31
  • [26] Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the diagnostic performance in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology A meta-analysis
    Wan Qichang
    Shen Jinming
    Li Lu
    Ji Bin
    Wang Renjie
    Zheng Xiuying
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (22)
  • [27] The role of 18F-FDG PET or 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules
    Li, Wenbo
    Pang, Hua
    Liu, Qiong
    Zhou, Jing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (10) : 2032 - 2037
  • [28] The diagnostic quality of 18-F-FDG PET images from the PET/MR in comparison with the PET/CT
    Voets, E.
    Visser, M. G. W.
    Mottaghy, F. M.
    Voo, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S84 - S85
  • [29] 18F-FDG-PET/CT in malignant mesothelioma
    Fuccio, Chiara
    Spinapolice, Elena Giulia
    Ferretti, Alice
    Castellucci, Paolo
    Marzola, Maria Cristina
    Trifiro, Giuseppe
    Rubello, Domenico
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 67 (06) : 539 - 542
  • [30] Erratum to: Improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastases of colorectal cancer in 18F-FDG-PET/CT by optimizing the iteration number for the image reconstruction
    Kazumasa Inoue
    Takashi Sato
    Hideaki Kitamura
    Masaaki Ito
    Yoshiyuki Tsunoda
    Akira Hirayama
    Hideo Kurosawa
    Takashi Tanaka
    Masahiro Fukushi
    Noriyuki Moriyama
    Hirofumi Fujii
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2010, 24 : 53 - 53