Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and fused 18F-FDG-PET-MR images with DWI for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases of HNSCC

被引:41
|
作者
Heusch, Philipp [1 ]
Sproll, Christoph [2 ]
Buchbender, Christian [1 ]
Rieser, Elena [2 ]
Terjung, Jan [3 ,4 ]
Antke, Christina [5 ]
Boeck, Inga [6 ]
Macht, Stephan [1 ]
Scherer, Axel [1 ]
Antoch, Gerald [1 ]
Heusner, Till A. [1 ]
Handschel, Joerg [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Fac Med, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Oral Maxillo & Plast Facial Surg, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Neuroradiol, Univ Hosp Essen, Fac Med, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Erwin L Hahn Inst Magnet Resonance Imaging, D-45141 Essen, Germany
[5] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Dept Nucl Med, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
[6] Univ Dusseldorf, Fac Med, Inst Pathol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC); Lymph node metastasis; Ultrasound; PET/CT; PET/MRI; Diffusion-weighted MRI; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; NECK-CANCER; HEAD; BENIGN; PET/CT; US; MR; LYMPHADENOPATHY; METAANALYSIS; CT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-013-1050-z
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study aimed to compare F-18-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/MRI (F-18-FDG-PET-MRI) fusion images, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), F-18-FDG-PET/CT, and ultrasound (US) regarding their performance in nodal staging of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Eighteen patients prospectively underwent ultrasound examination, F-18-FDG- PET/CT, and MRI before oral tumor resection and bilateral neck dissection. PET data sets were fused with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for nodal detection were calculated for all the imaging modalities. Furthermore, the accuracy of the correct N-staging was calculated for all methods. Detailed histopathology served as the standard of reference. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for detection of lymph node metastases were 63, 99, 86, 96, and 95 % for ultrasound; 30, 97, 56, 92, and 90 % for F-18-FDG-PET/CT; 52, 96, 59, 94, and 91 % for F-18-FDG-PET-MRI; and 53, 97, 67, 95, and 92 % for F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI, respectively. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis detection between F-18-FDG-PET-MRI and F-18-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.839) and between F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI and F-18-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.286), respectively. US was significantly more accurate than F-18-FDG-PET/CT (p = 0.009), whereas no significant difference was seen between F-18-FDG-PET-MRI and US (p = 0.223) or F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI and US (p = 0.115). The nodal stage was correctly rated by F-18-FDG-PET-MRI in eight patients, F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI in nine patients, US in 12 patients, and F-18-FDG-PET/CT in five out of 18 patients. Software-based fusion of F-18-FDG-PET-MRI and F-18-FDG-PET-MRI plus DWI may not increase nodal detection and N-staging performance in patients with oral malignancies compared to US and F-18-FDG-PET/CT. Surgical staging of cervical lymph nodes will not be replaced even by advanced imaging modalities in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:969 / 978
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and fused 18F-FDG-PET-MR images with DWI for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases of HNSCC
    Philipp Heusch
    Christoph Sproll
    Christian Buchbender
    Elena Rieser
    Jan Terjung
    Christina Antke
    Inga Boeck
    Stephan Macht
    Axel Scherer
    Gerald Antoch
    Till A. Heusner
    Jörg Handschel
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2014, 18 : 969 - 978
  • [2] 18F-FDG-PET/MR increases diagnostic confidence in detection of bone metastases compared with 18F-FDG-PET/CT
    Samarin, Andrei
    Huellner, Martin
    Queiroz, Marcelo A.
    Stolzmann, Paul
    Burger, Irene A.
    von Schulthess, Gustav
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2015, 36 (12) : 1165 - 1173
  • [3] Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review
    Amit Singnurkar
    Raymond Poon
    Ur Metser
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine, 2017, 31 : 366 - 378
  • [4] Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review
    Singnurkar, Amit
    Poon, Raymond
    Metser, Ur
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (05) : 366 - 378
  • [5] 18F-FDG-PET/CT
    Chierichetti, F.
    Pizzolato, G.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2012, 56 (02): : 138 - 150
  • [6] A Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the Cancer Staging of Locoregional Lymph Nodes
    Slouka, David
    Krcal, Jiri
    Kostlivy, Tomas
    Hrabacka, Petr
    Skalova, Alena
    Mirka, Hynek
    Topolcan, Ondrej
    Kucera, Radek
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (04): : 2029 - 2032
  • [7] CONTRAST-ENHANCED 18F-FDG-PET/CT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NECROTIC LYMPH NODE METASTASES
    Haerle, Stephan K.
    Strobel, Klaus
    Ahmad, Nader
    Soltermann, Alex
    Schmid, Daniel T.
    Stoeckli, Sandro J.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2011, 33 (03): : 324 - 329
  • [8] 18F-FDG-PET/CT in myelofibrosis
    Behrendt, F. F.
    Krohn, T.
    Palmowski, M.
    Mottaghy, F. M.
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 50 (06): : N66 - N67
  • [9] 18F-FDG-PET/CT and FUO
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (02) : 19N - 19N
  • [10] Lymph Node Assessment with 18F-FDG-PET and MRI in Uterine Cervical Cancer
    Monteil, Jacques
    Maubon, Antoine
    Leobon, Sophie
    Roux, Sonia
    Marin, Benoit
    Renaudie, Joel
    Genet, Dominique
    Fermeaux, Veronique
    Aubard, Yves
    Tubiana-Mathieu, Nicole
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 31 (11) : 3865 - 3871