Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of alumina recovery from secondary aluminum dross in China

被引:63
|
作者
Zhu, Xueyuan [1 ]
Jin, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Zhen [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Engn Res Ctr Solid Waste Treatment & Res, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Secondary aluminum dross; Recovery; Bauxite; EMISSIONS; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123291
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Secondary aluminum dross is regarded as a hazardous solid waste in many countries. A coupled life cycle assessment and life cycle costing method was used to evaluate the environmental impact and economic cost of two processes for producing alumina from bauxite and secondary aluminum dross. The results showed that the total normalized midpoint value of the dross process is 32.16% lower than that of the bauxite process. The cost of producing 1 t alumina by dross process is 130.01 $, accounting for only 49.54% of that of bauxite process. Ammonium sulfate as a by-product also brought in a profit of 22.18 $. These findings could be attributed to the decrease in energy and raw material consumption (i.e., steam, sodium hydroxide, electricity) and the relatively low cost of secondary aluminum dross. Adjusting raw materials for steam production and optimizing electricity structure could reduce the overall environmental impact of secondary aluminum dross recovery. Based on the forecast of environmental impact and policy adjustment in the future, inter-provincial dross transportation and southwest aluminum industry migration in China could be feasible solutions. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] TECHNOLOGY FOR THE RECOVERY OF ALUMINUM FROM DROSS
    KOS, B
    METALL, 1994, 48 (12): : 972 - 974
  • [22] Life cycle economic and environmental assessment of resource recovery from an agricultural waste system in Costa Rica
    Orner, Kevin
    Alvarez, Marisol
    Ramirez, Xochitl
    Cornejo, Pablo
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [23] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of electric bicycles with different batteries in China
    Liu, Min
    Zhang, Kexin
    Liang, Yiping
    Yang, Yuzhe
    Chen, Zhihui
    Liu, Wei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 385
  • [24] Life-cycle environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge treatment in China
    Xu, Changqing
    Chen, Wei
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 67 : 79 - 87
  • [25] Optimizing Wet Hydrolysis for Nitrogen Removal and Alumina Recovery from Secondary Aluminium Dross (SAD)
    Jiang, Qiao
    Lee, Bin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [26] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of ceramic tile production: A case study in China
    Ye, Liping
    Hong, Jinglan
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Yang, Donglu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 432 - 441
  • [27] Recovery of Fe, Cr and Ni in pickling sludge with aluminum nitride in secondary aluminum dross
    Shen, Hanlin
    Liu, Bo
    Liu, Ying
    Zhang, Junjie
    Liu, Jun
    Zhang, Shengen
    Minerals Engineering, 2022, 184
  • [28] An environmental and economic assessment based on life cycle approaches for industrial wastewater treatment and water recovery
    Capa, Seda
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Banar, Mufide
    JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 49
  • [29] Jamaican bioethanol: an environmental and economic life cycle assessment
    E. Batuecas
    R. Contreras-Lisperguer
    C. Mayo
    R. Díaz
    C. Springer
    F. J. Pérez
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23 : 1415 - 1430
  • [30] Jamaican bioethanol: an environmental and economic life cycle assessment
    Batuecas, E.
    Contreras-Lisperguer, R.
    Mayo, C.
    Diaz, R.
    Springer, C.
    Perez, F. J.
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2021, 23 (05) : 1415 - 1430