Natural gas from shale formation - The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States

被引:546
|
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xi [1 ]
Jha, Awadhesh N. [3 ]
Rogers, Howard [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Western Res Ctr Energy & Ecoenvironm Policy, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Bot & Plant Sci, Ecol Complex & Modeling Lab, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[3] Univ Plymouth, Sch Biol Sci, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[4] Oxford Inst Energy Studies, Oxford, England
来源
关键词
Natural gas from shale formation; Energy revolution; Environmental challenge; Best practices; US shale gas; MISSISSIPPIAN BARNETT SHALE; FORT-WORTH BASIN; DRINKING-WATER WELLS; NORTH-CENTRAL TEXAS; OIL-PRICE SHOCK; METHANE CONTAMINATION; INDUCED SEISMICITY; CARBON FOOTPRINT; NUCLEAR SAFETY; AIR EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.065
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Extraction of natural gas from shale rock in the United States (US) is one of the landmark events in the 21st century. The combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing can extract huge quantities of natural gas from impermeable shale formations, which were previously thought to be either impossible or uneconomic to produce. This review offers a comprehensive insight into US shale gas opportunities, appraising the evolution, evidence and the challenges of shale gas production in the US. The history of US shale gas in this article is divided into three periods and based on the change of oil price (i.e., the period before the 1970s oil crisis, the period from 1970s to 2000, and the period since 2000), the US has moved from being one of the world's biggest importers of gas to being self-sufficient in less than a decade, with the shale gas production increasing 12-fold (from 2000 to 2010). The US domestic natural gas price hit a 10-year low in 2012. The US domestic natural gas price in the first half of 2012 was about $2 per million British Thermal Unit (BTU), compared with Brent crude, the world benchmark price for oil, now about $ 80-100/barrel, or $14-17 per million BTU. Partly due to an increase in gas-fired power generation in response to low gas prices, US carbon emissions from fossil-fuel combustion fell by 430 million ton CO2 - more than any other country - between 2006 and 2011. Shale gas also stimulated economic growth, creating 600,000 new jobs in the US by 2010. However, the US shale gas revolution would be curbed, if the environmental risks posed by hydraulic fracturing are not managed effectively. The hydraulic fracturing is water intensive, and can cause pollution in the marine environment, with implications for long-term environmental sustainability in several ways. Also, large amounts of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, can be emitted during the shale gas exploration and production. Hydraulic fracturing also may induce earthquakes. These environmental risks need to be managed by good practices which is not being applied by all the producers in all the locations. Enforcing stronger regulations are necessary to minimize risk to the environment and on human health. Robust regulatory oversight can however increase the cost of extraction, but stringent regulations can foster an historic opportunity to provide cheaper and cleaner gas to meet the consumer demand, as well as to usher in the future growth of the industry. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Emerging Shale Gas Revolution in China
    Chang, Yunhua
    Liu, Xuejun
    Christie, Peter
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 46 (22) : 12281 - 12282
  • [22] Environmental regulatory system for shale gas development in the United States and its implications for China's shale gas development
    Xia, Liangyu
    Wang, Xue
    Wu, Yao
    Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43 (05): : 108 - 114
  • [23] Natural Gas Plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and Potential Opportunities
    Kargbo, David M.
    Wilhelm, Ron G.
    Campbell, David J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (15) : 5679 - 5684
  • [24] Unfinished business in the regulation of shale gas production in the United States
    Centner, Terence J.
    O'Connell, Laura Kathryn
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 476 : 359 - 367
  • [25] An approach for assessing engineering risk from shale gas wells in the United States
    Soeder, Daniel J.
    Sharma, Shikha
    Pekney, Natalie
    Hopkinson, Leslie
    Dilmore, Robert
    Kutchko, Barbara
    Stewart, Brian
    Carter, Kimberly
    Hakala, Alexandra
    Capo, Rosemary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2014, 126 : 4 - 19
  • [26] Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States
    Jenner, Steffen
    Lamadrid, Alberto J.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 : 442 - 453
  • [27] Heterogeneous risk spillovers from crude oil to regional natural gas markets: the role of the shale gas revolution
    Wang, Ningli
    You, Wanhai
    Peng, Cheng
    ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2019, 14 (06) : 215 - 234
  • [28] The long-run oil-natural gas price relationship and the shale gas revolution
    Caporin, Massimiliano
    Fontini, Fulvio
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 64 : 511 - 519
  • [29] IMPACT OF SHALE GAS ON NATURAL GAS MARKET IN POLAND
    Siemek, Jakub
    Kaliski, Maciej
    Rychlicki, Stanislaw
    Janusz, Piotr
    Sikora, Sylwia
    Szurlej, Adam
    RYNEK ENERGII, 2011, (05): : 118 - 124
  • [30] Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gas
    Demirbas, Ayhan
    Cek, Nurettin
    Acar, Sukru
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (20) : 1690 - 1695