Disagreement and factors between symptom on self-report and clinician rating of major depressive disorder: A report of a national survey in China

被引:9
|
作者
Lyu Dongbin [1 ]
Wu Zhiguo [1 ]
Wang Yun [1 ]
Huang Qinte [1 ]
Wu Zhenling [1 ]
Cao Tongdan [1 ,4 ]
Zhao Jie [1 ,4 ]
Cao Yonghua [1 ]
Hu Yingyan [1 ]
Chen Jun [1 ]
Wang Yong [1 ]
Su Yousong [1 ]
Zhang Chen [1 ]
Peng Daihui [1 ]
Li Zezhi [1 ]
Cao Lan [1 ]
Hong Wu [1 ,2 ]
Fang Yiru [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr, Sch Med, 600 Wan Ping Nan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Mental Hlth Ctr, Shanghai Key Lab Psychot Disorders, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Ctr Excellence Brain Sci & Intelligence Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Huangpu Dist Mental Hlth Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Depression; Diagnosis; Self-report; Clinician rating; Symptom severity; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW GUIDE; SEVERITY; SCALE; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; CONCORDANCE; ANXIETY; PHQ-9; QIDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.073
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is a popular strategy of clinical management for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). The consistency of self-report and clinical measurements is of importance, but whether individual symptom severity is in agreement for both self-report and clinician rating in MDD has not been comprehensively tested. This study aimed to test whether individual symptom severity of MDD was in agreement between self-report and clinician rating, and to explore factors affecting the agreement. Methods: In the National Survey on Symptomatology of Depression (NSSD) of China, 3275 patients with a major depressive episode were evaluated by both self-report and a clinician-rated version of 62 questions. Results: On average, 59% of all patients reached absolute agreement with their research clinicians. Among all questions, 73% returned with moderate positive strength of correlation, followed by 27% with low positive correlation. In 77% of the total questions, there was a tendency to rate higher in the self-report version compared with the clinician-rated version. After classifying the symptoms by six major domains, it was found that patients and clinicians showed more consistent answers in history and somatic questions (81% and 65% reached agreement), and that there were more differences in mood, energy, and anxiety questions (up to 56% in full agreement). "Outpatient", "high financial status", "poor working condition", and "high education level" were found to be significant positive predictors for patients rating higher than clinicians or patients and clinicians reaching agreement as opposed to clinicians rating higher than patients. Limitations: The cross-sectional nature of our study undermines the interpretation of the results across the MDD treatment course. Conclusions: It is sufficient to use the self-report version of a questionnaire to screen, monitor, and detect remission for MDD symptoms. Complete assessment of depression severity should take both clinician-rated scales and self-reported measures into consideration. Factors other than source of admission, financial status, working condition, and education level should be further investigated for the discrepancy between self-report and clinician rating.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF SYMPTOMS OF MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER - SELF-REPORT VS CLINICIAN RATINGS
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    CORYELL, W
    WILSON, S
    CORENTHAL, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1986, 174 (03) : 150 - 153
  • [2] A SELF-REPORT SCALE TO DIAGNOSE MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    CORYELL, W
    CORENTHAL, C
    WILSON, S
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 43 (11) : 1076 - 1081
  • [3] THE VALIDITY OF A SELF-REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DIAGNOSING MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    CORYELL, W
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 45 (08) : 738 - 740
  • [4] The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rated and Self-report A Psychometric Assessment in Chinese Americans With Major Depressive Disorder
    Yeung, Albert
    Feldman, Gregory
    Pedrelli, Paola
    Hails, Kate
    Fava, Maurizio
    Reyes, Tracy
    Mundt, James C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2012, 200 (08) : 712 - 715
  • [5] Validity of LIDAS (LIfetime Depression Assessment Self-report): a self-report online assessment of lifetime major depressive disorder
    Bot, M.
    Middeldorp, C. M.
    de Geus, E. J. C.
    Lau, H. M.
    Sinke, M.
    van Nieuwenhuizen, B.
    Smit, J. H.
    Boomsma, D. I.
    Penninx, B. W. J. H.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (02) : 279 - 289
  • [6] The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Clinician and Self-Report Versions) in Patients With Bipolar Disorder
    Bernstein, Ira H.
    Rush, A. John
    Suppes, Trisha
    Kyotoku, Yakasushi
    Warden, Diane
    [J]. CNS SPECTRUMS, 2010, 15 (06) : 367 - 373
  • [7] Reasons for Disagreement between Proxy-Report and Self-Report Rating of Symptoms in Children Receiving Cancer Therapies
    Tomlinson, D.
    Plenert, E.
    Dazie, G.
    Loves, R.
    Cook, S.
    Schecter, T.
    Dupuis, L.
    Sung, L.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2020, 67 : S90 - S90
  • [8] Reasons for disagreement between proxy-report and self-report rating of symptoms in children receiving cancer therapies
    Tomlinson, Deborah
    Plenert, Erin
    Dadzie, Grace
    Loves, Robyn
    Cook, Sadie
    Schechter, Tal
    Dupuis, L. Lee
    Sung, Lillian
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (07) : 4165 - 4170
  • [9] Reasons for disagreement between proxy-report and self-report rating of symptoms in children receiving cancer therapies
    Deborah Tomlinson
    Erin Plenert
    Grace Dadzie
    Robyn Loves
    Sadie Cook
    Tal Schechter
    L. Lee Dupuis
    Lillian Sung
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 4165 - 4170
  • [10] Self-report and Cognitive Processing Measures of Depressive Thinking Predict Subsequent Major Depressive Disorder
    Stephanie S. Rude
    Jennifer A. Durham-Fowler
    Emily S. Baum
    Stephanie B. Rooney
    Kacey L. Maestas
    [J]. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2010, 34 : 107 - 115