Validity of LIDAS (LIfetime Depression Assessment Self-report): a self-report online assessment of lifetime major depressive disorder

被引:24
|
作者
Bot, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Middeldorp, C. M. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
de Geus, E. J. C. [5 ,6 ]
Lau, H. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sinke, M. [5 ,6 ]
van Nieuwenhuizen, B. [5 ,6 ]
Smit, J. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Boomsma, D. I. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Penninx, B. W. J. H. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] GGZ InGeest, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Neurosci Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Composite International Diagnostic Interview; lifetime depression; major depressive disorder; online questionnaires; DIAGNOSTIC INTERVIEW CIDI; MENTAL-HEALTH SURVEY; AGE-OF-ONSET; ANXIETY DISORDERS; RELIABILITY; PREVALENCE; METAANALYSIS; INVENTORY; COMMUNITY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1017/S0033291716002312
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background. There is a paucity of valid, brief instruments for the assessment of lifetime major depressive disorder (MDD) that can be used in, for example, large-scale genomics, imaging or biomarker studies on depression. We developed the LIfetime Depression Assessment Self-report (LIDAS), which assesses lifetime MDD diagnosis according to DSM criteria, and is largely based on the widely used Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Here, we tested the feasibility and determined the sensitivity and specificity for measuring lifetime MDD with this new questionnaire, with a regular CIDI as reference. Method. Sensitivity and specificity analyses of the online lifetime MDD questionnaire were performed in adults with (n = 177) and without (n = 87) lifetime MDD according to regular index CIDIs, selected from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) and Netherlands Twin Register (NTR). Feasibility was tested in an additional nonselective, population-based sample of NTR participants (n = 245). Results. Of the 753 invited persons, 509 (68%) completed the LIDAS, of which 419 (82%) did this online. User-friendliness of the instrument was rated high. Median completion time was 6.2 min. Sensitivity and specificity for lifetime MDD were 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 80-91%] and 80% (95% CI 72-89%), respectively. This LIDAS instrument gave a lifetime MDD prevalence of 20.8% in the population-based sample. Conclusions. Measuring lifetime MDD with an online instrument was feasible. Sensitivity and specificity were adequate. The instrument gave a prevalence of lifetime MDD in line with reported population prevalences. LIDAS is a promising tool for rapid determination of lifetime MDD status in large samples, such as needed for genomics studies.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 289
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement and genetic architecture of lifetime depression in the Netherlands as assessed by LIDAS (Lifetime Depression Assessment Self-report)
    Fedko, Iryna O.
    Hottenga, Jouke-Jan
    Helmer, Quinta
    Mbarek, Hamdi
    Huider, Floris
    Amin, Najaf
    Beulens, Joline W.
    Bremmer, Marijke A.
    Elders, Petra J.
    Galesloot, Tessel E.
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A.
    van Loo, Hanna M.
    Picavet, H. Susan J.
    Rutters, Femke
    van der Spek, Ashley
    van de Wiel, Anne M.
    van Duijn, Cornelia
    de Geus, Eco J. C.
    Feskens, Edith J. M.
    Hartman, Catharina A.
    Oldehinkel, Albertine J.
    Smit, Jan H.
    Verschuren, W. M. Monique
    Penninx, Brenda W. J. H.
    Boomsma, Dorret I.
    Bot, Mariska
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (08) : 1345 - 1354
  • [2] THE VALIDITY OF A SELF-REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR DIAGNOSING MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    CORYELL, W
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 45 (08) : 738 - 740
  • [3] PITFALLS IN SELF-REPORT ASSESSMENT OF DEPRESSION
    PRUSOFF, BA
    KLERMAN, GL
    PAYKEL, ES
    [J]. CANADIAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1972, 17 : S101 - S107
  • [4] A SELF-REPORT SCALE TO DIAGNOSE MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    CORYELL, W
    CORENTHAL, C
    WILSON, S
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1986, 43 (11) : 1076 - 1081
  • [5] The validity of self-report assessment of avoidance and distress
    Gamez, Wakiza
    Kotov, Roman
    Watson, David
    [J]. ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2010, 23 (01): : 87 - 99
  • [6] Lifetime Asymptomatic for Back Pain The Validity of Self-report Measures in Soldiers
    Carragee, Eugene J.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    [J]. SPINE, 2009, 34 (09) : 978 - 983
  • [7] DIAGNOSIS OF MAJOR DEPRESSION BY SELF-REPORT
    WETZLER, S
    KAHN, R
    STRAUMAN, TJ
    DUBRO, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1989, 53 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [8] Assessment of mindfulness by self-report
    Baer, Ruth
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 28 : 42 - 48
  • [9] VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORT
    WALSH, WB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1967, 14 (01) : 18 - &
  • [10] THE INVENTORY TO DIAGNOSE DEPRESSION (IDD) - A SELF-REPORT SCALE TO DIAGNOSE MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER
    ZIMMERMAN, M
    CORYELL, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 55 (01) : 55 - 59