Associations of County-level Radiologist and Mammography Facility Supply with Screening Mammography Rates in the United States

被引:3
|
作者
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [1 ]
Moy, Linda [1 ]
Fleming, Margaret M. [2 ]
Duszak, Richard, Jr. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol,Ctr Biomed Imaging, 660 First Ave,3rd Floor, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
Screening mammography; Medicare; physician supply; geographic variation; health policy; BREAST-CANCER; GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS; TRAVEL-TIME; WOMEN; ADHERENCE; IMPACT; PATIENT; DETERMINANTS; PREDICTORS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2017.11.023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: The present study aims to assess associations of Medicare beneficiary screening mammography rates with local mammography facility and radiologist availability. Materials and Methods: Mammography screening rates for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were obtained for US counties using the County Health Rankings data set. County-level certified mammography facility counts were obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration. County-level mammogram-interpreting radiologist and breast imaging subspecialist counts were determined using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee-for-service claims files. Spearman correlations and multivariable linear regressions were performed using counties' facility and radiologist counts, as well as counts normalized to counties' Medicare fee-forservice beneficiary volume and land area. Results: Across 3035 included counties, average screening mammography rates were 60.5% +/- 8.2% (range 26%-88%). Correlations between county-level screening rates and total mammography facilities, facilities per 100,000 square mile county area, total mammography-interpreting radiologists, and mammography-interpreting radiologists per 100,000 county-level Medicare beneficiaries were all weak (r = 0.22-0.26). Correlations between county-level screening rates and mammography rates per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries, total breast imaging subspecialist radiologists, and breast imaging subspecialist radiologists per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries were all minimal (r = 0.06-0.16). Multivariable analyses overall demonstrated radiologist supply to have a stronger independent effect than facility supply, although effect sizes remained weak for both. Conclusion: Mammography facility and radiologist supply-side factors are only weakly associated with county-level Medicare beneficiary screening mammography rates, and as such, screening mammography may differ from many other health-care services. Although efforts to enhance facility and radiologist supply may be helpful, initiatives to improve screening mammography rates should focus more on demand-side factors, such as patient education and primary care physician education and access.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 888
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Re: "A County-Level Analysis of the US Radiologist Workforce: Physician Supply and Subspecialty Characteristics" Reply
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Hughes, Danny R.
    Duszak, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (09) : 1205 - 1205
  • [42] Patient, Radiologist, and Examination Characteristics Affecting Screening Mammography Recall Rates in a Large Academic Practice
    Giess, Catherine S.
    Wang, Aijia
    Ip, Ivan K.
    Lacson, Ronilda
    Pourjabbar, Sarvanez
    Khorasani, Ramin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (04) : 411 - 418
  • [43] Association between trends in county-level opioid prescribing and reported rates of gonorrhea cases in the United States
    Abara, Winston E.
    Hong, Jaeyoung
    Dorji, Tandin
    Bohm, Michele K.
    Weston, Emily J.
    Bernstein, Kyle T.
    Kirkcaldy, Robert D.
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 36 : 26 - 32
  • [44] Whites' County-Level Racial Bias, COVID-19 Rates, and Racial Inequities in the United States
    Thomas, Marilyn D.
    Michaels, Eli K.
    Darling-Hammond, Sean
    Nguyen, Thu T.
    Glymour, M. Maria
    Vittinghoff, Eric
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (22) : 1 - 19
  • [45] County-level colorectal cancer screening rates on colorectal cancer survival in the state of Georgia: Does county-level rurality matter?
    Tsai, Meng-Han
    Coughlin, Steven S.
    Cortes, Jorge
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (01):
  • [46] Predicting County-level Chlamydia Rates in the United States Using Machine Learning Regression and Tree Models
    Xu, Tong
    Hong, Jaeyoung
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2022, 49 (10S) : S99 - S99
  • [47] An Ecological Study on the Spatially Varying Relationship between County-Level Suicide Rates and Altitude in the United States
    Ha, Hoehun
    Tu, Wei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (04)
  • [48] Changing Spatiotemporal Trends in County-Level Heart Failure Death Rates in the United States, 1999 to 2018
    Vaughan, Adam S.
    George, Mary G.
    Jackson, Sandra L.
    Schieb, Linda
    Casper, Michele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (04): : 1 - 25
  • [49] Association of social vulnerability and influenza vaccination rates for Annual Medicare Enrollees at the county-level in the United States
    Tatar, Moosa
    Farokhi, Soheila
    Araz, Ozgur M.
    Deshpande, Abhishek
    Wilson, Fernando A.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 177
  • [50] THE IMPACT OF THE RURAL-POPULATION COMPONENT ON HOMICIDE RATES IN THE UNITED-STATES - A COUNTY-LEVEL ANALYSIS
    KOWALSKI, GS
    DUFFIELD, D
    [J]. RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 1990, 55 (01) : 76 - 90